Talk:Reproducibility: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
imported>Petréa Mitchell (Article checklist; ditch the JIR link) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{checklist | |||
| abc = Reproducibility | |||
| cat1 = Library and Information Science | |||
| cat2 = | |||
| cat3 = | |||
| cat_check = y | |||
| status = 4 | |||
| underlinked = y | |||
| cleanup = y | |||
| by = [[User:Petréa Mitchell|Petréa Mitchell]] 14:51, 12 May 2007 (CDT) | |||
}} | |||
The "wikipedia" template is redundant and therefore deprecated now. Please check the "Content is from Wikipedia?" box. | The "wikipedia" template is redundant and therefore deprecated now. Please check the "Content is from Wikipedia?" box. | ||
In fact, if you look at [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Special:Whatlinkshere&target=Template%3AWikipedia] you'll see that only a few Wikipedia-sourced articles use this template; we should delete all instances, and make sure the box is checked. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 18:24, 28 March 2007 (CDT) | In fact, if you look at [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Special:Whatlinkshere&target=Template%3AWikipedia] you'll see that only a few Wikipedia-sourced articles use this template; we should delete all instances, and make sure the box is checked. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 18:24, 28 March 2007 (CDT) | ||
==Ditch the JIR link?== | |||
It seems to me that the ''Journal of Irreproducible Results'', despite the name, really isn't topical here. [[User:Petréa Mitchell|Petréa Mitchell]] 14:51, 12 May 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 13:51, 12 May 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Library and Information Science Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories] |
Article status | External article: from another source, with little change |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | Petréa Mitchell 14:51, 12 May 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
The "wikipedia" template is redundant and therefore deprecated now. Please check the "Content is from Wikipedia?" box.
In fact, if you look at [1] you'll see that only a few Wikipedia-sourced articles use this template; we should delete all instances, and make sure the box is checked. --Larry Sanger 18:24, 28 March 2007 (CDT)
Ditch the JIR link?
It seems to me that the Journal of Irreproducible Results, despite the name, really isn't topical here. Petréa Mitchell 14:51, 12 May 2007 (CDT)
Categories:
- Library and Information Science Category Check
- General Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Library and Information Science Advanced Articles
- Library and Information Science Nonstub Articles
- Library and Information Science Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Library and Information Science Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Library and Information Science Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Library and Information Science Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Library and Information Science External Articles
- Library and Information Science Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Library and Information Science Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Cleanup