Square root of two: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Subpagination Bot
m (Add {{subpages}} and remove any categories (details))
imported>Johan Förberg
(→‎Proof of Irrationality: Added Pythagoras and reductio ad absurdum)
Line 7: Line 7:


== Proof of Irrationality ==
== Proof of Irrationality ==
There exists a simple proof by contradiction showing that <math>\sqrt{2}</math> is irrational:
There exists a simple proof by contradiction showing that <math>\sqrt{2}</math> is irrational. This proof is often attributed to [[Pythagoras]]. It is an example of a [[reductio ad absurdum]] type of proof:


Suppose <math>\sqrt{2}</math> is rational.  Then there must exist two numbers, <math>x, y \in \mathbb{N}</math>, such that <math>\frac{x}{y} = \sqrt{2}</math> and <math>x</math> and <math>y</math> represent the smallest such [[integer|integers]] (i.e., they are [[mutually prime]]).
Suppose <math>\sqrt{2}</math> is rational.  Then there must exist two numbers, <math>x, y \in \mathbb{N}</math>, such that <math>\frac{x}{y} = \sqrt{2}</math> and <math>x</math> and <math>y</math> represent the smallest such [[integer|integers]] (i.e., they are [[mutually prime]]).

Revision as of 03:13, 14 October 2010

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

The square root of two, denoted , is the positive number whose square equals 2. It is approximately 1.4142135623730950488016887242097. It provides a typical example of an irrational number.

In Right Triangles

The square root of two plays an important role in right triangles in that a unit right triangle (where both legs are equal to 1), has a hypotenuse of . Thus, .

Proof of Irrationality

There exists a simple proof by contradiction showing that is irrational. This proof is often attributed to Pythagoras. It is an example of a reductio ad absurdum type of proof:

Suppose is rational. Then there must exist two numbers, , such that and and represent the smallest such integers (i.e., they are mutually prime).

Therefore, and ,

Thus, represents an even number; therefore must also be even. This means that there is an integer such that . Inserting it back into our previous equation, we find that

Through simplification, we find that , and then that, ,

Since is an integer, and therefore also must also be even. However, if and are both even, they share a common factor of 2, making them not mutually prime. And that is a contradiction, so the assumption must be false, and must not be rational.