Talk:Radiochemistry: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Subpagination Bot
m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details))
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}


== Cut from the article ==
==Generalizing analytical aspects==
n/a
I'm thinking of moving the very nice material, especially graphics, of activation analysis to [[neutron activation]] analysis, and replacing it with a section on "analytical methods" to include summaries of a range of radiochemical analyses rather than singling out that one. Some of that should also point to higher-level articles on elemental and molecular (macromolecular?) analyses.
 
Where's the line? Is any use of tracers radiochemistry? Immunoelectrophoresis with tagged reactants? [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 16:32, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 11:32, 17 May 2010

This article is developed but not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition The chemistry of radioactive materials [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Chemistry [Please add or review categories]
 Subgroup category:  Nuclear Engineering
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

Generalizing analytical aspects

I'm thinking of moving the very nice material, especially graphics, of activation analysis to neutron activation analysis, and replacing it with a section on "analytical methods" to include summaries of a range of radiochemical analyses rather than singling out that one. Some of that should also point to higher-level articles on elemental and molecular (macromolecular?) analyses.

Where's the line? Is any use of tracers radiochemistry? Immunoelectrophoresis with tagged reactants? Howard C. Berkowitz 16:32, 17 May 2010 (UTC)