Talk:Sequence: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Aleksander Stos
imported>Catherine Woodgold
Line 18: Line 18:
:''"Formally, given any  set ''X'', an infinite sequence is a function (''f'', say) defined on the [[natural numbers]] <math>\{1,2,3,...\}</math>, with values in ''X''. "''
:''"Formally, given any  set ''X'', an infinite sequence is a function (''f'', say) defined on the [[natural numbers]] <math>\{1,2,3,...\}</math>, with values in ''X''. "''
(I'm not sure whether to include zero in the natural numbers.)  --[[User:Catherine Woodgold|Catherine Woodgold]] 08:12, 28 April 2007 (CDT)
(I'm not sure whether to include zero in the natural numbers.)  --[[User:Catherine Woodgold|Catherine Woodgold]] 08:12, 28 April 2007 (CDT)
::Done.  --[[User:Catherine Woodgold|Catherine Woodgold]] 10:14, 29 April 2007 (CDT)


== Simple example? ==
== Simple example? ==

Revision as of 09:14, 29 April 2007


Article Checklist for "Sequence"
Workgroup category or categories Mathematics Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by --AlekStos 02:57, 10 March 2007 (CST)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





defined on the natural numbers

I would like to change this:

"Formally, given any set X, an infinite sequence is a function (f, say) defined on a subset of natural numbers with values in X. "

to this:

"Formally, given any set X, an infinite sequence is a function (f, say) defined on the natural numbers , with values in X. "

(I'm not sure whether to include zero in the natural numbers.) --Catherine Woodgold 08:12, 28 April 2007 (CDT)

Done. --Catherine Woodgold 10:14, 29 April 2007 (CDT)

Simple example?

This is given as a "simple example" of a sequence of complex numbers:

How about a simpler example, where it's easy to predict the next term? e.g.

--Catherine Woodgold 08:20, 28 April 2007 (CDT)

I wouldn't object any proposed changes, the formal definition above included (well I thought a while about this definition and I think there would be no harm if the term "subset" gets deleted). As for 0 in naturals, nothing is "globally" decided, so probably both solutions are possible (I'd start with 1).--AlekStos 11:55, 28 April 2007 (CDT)