Talk:Beowulf Cluster: Difference between revisions
imported>Eric M Gearhart (More info about Beowulf clusters) |
imported>Eric M Gearhart (Gonna "be bold") |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Beowulf is a ''class'' of cluster. There are other types of clusters (/me goes off and looks to see if the Mosix article exists on CZ) --[[User:Eric M Gearhart|Eric M Gearhart]] 11:13, 30 March 2007 (CDT) | Beowulf is a ''class'' of cluster. There are other types of clusters (/me goes off and looks to see if the Mosix article exists on CZ) --[[User:Eric M Gearhart|Eric M Gearhart]] 11:13, 30 March 2007 (CDT) | ||
OK well I'm going to '''be bold''' and move it over to Beowulf cluster --[[User:Eric M Gearhart|Eric M Gearhart]] 12:03, 30 March 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 11:03, 30 March 2007
Should live at Beowulf cluster, unless "Beowulf Cluster" is a proper name--right? --Larry Sanger 08:48, 22 February 2007 (CST)
In all known publications both names are used - probably due to the connection with HPPC computing and MPC (massive parallel computing) and other distriduted ways of high performance computing. Robert Tito | Talk
Here's a simple test - in which form is it most likely to be written in an article - Cluster or cluster? -- ZachPruckowski (Talk) 09:18, 22 February 2007 (CST)
OK well here's another test... on the page http://beowulf.org it's "Beowulf.org is a collection of resources for the expanding universe of users and designers of Beowulf class cluster computers."
Beowulf is a class of cluster. There are other types of clusters (/me goes off and looks to see if the Mosix article exists on CZ) --Eric M Gearhart 11:13, 30 March 2007 (CDT)
OK well I'm going to be bold and move it over to Beowulf cluster --Eric M Gearhart 12:03, 30 March 2007 (CDT)