CZ:Article Deletion Policy: Difference between revisions
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
imported>Larry Sanger mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''Note: we are now engaged in [[CZ:The Big Speedydelete]]. See that page for specific instructions, but see below for general deletion policies and instructions.'' | ''Note: we are now engaged in [[CZ:The Big Speedydelete]]. See that page for specific instructions, but see below for general deletion policies and instructions.'' | ||
==Articles deletable by constables acting on their own recognizance== | ==Articles deletable by constables acting on their own recognizance== |
Revision as of 10:40, 17 February 2007
Note: we are now engaged in CZ:The Big Speedydelete. See that page for specific instructions, but see below for general deletion policies and instructions.
Articles deletable by constables acting on their own recognizance
In general, an article may (and in some cases should) be deleted by a constable, acting on his or her own recognizance, if:
- it was copied from Wikipedia or some other online source (where it can now be read) over one week ago, and no one has made any substantive revisions to it then or since then, regardless of whether it was marked "CZ Live" or not;
- it was drafted solely by a contributor and then blanked by that contributor;
- it consists of two sentences or less, or 50 words or less, which have been left on the wiki for more than two hours;
- it is for some reason evidently worthless, as in the case of vandalism; or
- it is primarily (and thus presumably could be entirely) the result of a copyright violation.
Note that authors may help mark articles to delete: see below.
Articles deletable only after editor instruction
While at present only constables have the system permissions to delete articles, deletion of articles on certain other grounds requires an instruction from the relevant discipline workgroup.
Deletion requires workgroup instruction if the proposed grounds for deletion include:
- the article is of such low quality (in terms of inaccuracy, bias, poor writing, or whatever) that it would be more efficient to start over than to try to clean up the current one (this also can be achieved by blanking, if one does in fact wish to start over);
- there is another entire article, of higher quality, that should replace the current one (note, this also can be achieved simply by pasting the new article over the old one); or
(Note that deletion in both of the above cases is not strictly necessary, except to delete the page history and to make links to the article turn red.)
- the article is not maintainable;
- either the topic or the contents of the article constitutes original research; or
- the article is unduly near in subject matter to another related article (so that one of the two articles "must go").
Procedures for deletion marking and deletion
For articles deletable by constables acting on their own recognizance, any author or editor may help by placing the {{speedydelete}}
template directly on the article page itself. This is a rare exception to the rule that contributor-aimed templates are not to be placed on articles; we want to make it very clear to readers that the article on a page is not worth looking at. This will then construct a list of articles to delete viewable at Category:Speedy Deletion Requests.
If an author or editor has recently put {{speedydelete}}
templates on very many articles, or notices that there are more than, say, 25, please e-mail constables@citizendium.org and a constable should soon clear out
Note that deliberate misuse of the {{speedydelete}}
template will lead to a contributor's ejection from the project.