Talk:Perl: Difference between revisions
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
imported>Pat Palmer (category check OK) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{checklist | {{checklist | ||
| abc = PERL | | abc = PERL | ||
Line 10: | Line 4: | ||
| cat2 = | | cat2 = | ||
| cat3 = | | cat3 = | ||
| cat_check = | | cat_check = n | ||
| status = 2 | | status = 2 | ||
| underlinked = Y | | underlinked = Y | ||
Line 16: | Line 10: | ||
| by = [[User:Georg Heidenreich|Georg Heidenreich]] 22:53, 30 May 2007 (CDT) | | by = [[User:Georg Heidenreich|Georg Heidenreich]] 22:53, 30 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
}} | }} | ||
__TOC__ | |||
I'd like to import the "good article" version of wikipedia's Perl entry. Is there an efficient way of importing articles from there? or do I have to copy/paste the source? --Joey Kelly | |||
Unfortunately, no, there isn't. See: [[CZ:How to convert Wikipedia articles to Citizendium articles]], which I am about to fix up as there seems to be a demand for it... --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 16:58, 14 February 2007 (CST) | |||
Now I'm really curious what "the arbitrary limitations of many scripting languages at the time" were. Really. --[[User:Markus Baumeister|Markus Baumeister]] 16:41, 7 March 2007 (CST) | |||
I've been lurking around for quite a while and I thought I should finally contribute. When I wrote the new '''Perl''' page, I tried to eliminate all wording from the original stump that could be construed as originating from WP (sorry, now we'll never know what the "arbitrary limitations" are ;) ). I actually have one advantage: since I currently live in China, it is '''very''' awkward to read WP (you need to use proxies because of the "Great Firewall") *) so I wasn't even tempted to copy anything from them. | I've been lurking around for quite a while and I thought I should finally contribute. When I wrote the new '''Perl''' page, I tried to eliminate all wording from the original stump that could be construed as originating from WP (sorry, now we'll never know what the "arbitrary limitations" are ;) ). I actually have one advantage: since I currently live in China, it is '''very''' awkward to read WP (you need to use proxies because of the "Great Firewall") *) so I wasn't even tempted to copy anything from them. |
Revision as of 22:16, 21 September 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Computers Workgroup [Categories OK] |
Article status | Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | No |
Checklist last edited by | Georg Heidenreich 22:53, 30 May 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
I'd like to import the "good article" version of wikipedia's Perl entry. Is there an efficient way of importing articles from there? or do I have to copy/paste the source? --Joey Kelly
Unfortunately, no, there isn't. See: CZ:How to convert Wikipedia articles to Citizendium articles, which I am about to fix up as there seems to be a demand for it... --Larry Sanger 16:58, 14 February 2007 (CST)
Now I'm really curious what "the arbitrary limitations of many scripting languages at the time" were. Really. --Markus Baumeister 16:41, 7 March 2007 (CST)
I've been lurking around for quite a while and I thought I should finally contribute. When I wrote the new Perl page, I tried to eliminate all wording from the original stump that could be construed as originating from WP (sorry, now we'll never know what the "arbitrary limitations" are ;) ). I actually have one advantage: since I currently live in China, it is very awkward to read WP (you need to use proxies because of the "Great Firewall") *) so I wasn't even tempted to copy anything from them.
I wrote this first draft on my private mediawiki, the CZ templates are of course not available, e.g. my citation style is way off. Since I am relocating to Europe soon (temporarily for 14 months), starting June 10 I won't be able to use my computers for several weeks. That is a good time for all of you to mess it up thoroughly ;) !
*) this is how I happened to stumble over CZ in the first place - now of course I'm convinced it is the better way
--Georg Heidenreich 09:02, 31 May 2007 (CDT) (newbie)
Well done, Georg--thanks for the article on one of my favorite computer subjects. --Larry Sanger 09:13, 31 May 2007 (CDT)
- Computers Category Check
- General Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Computers Advanced Articles
- Computers Nonstub Articles
- Computers Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Computers Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Computers Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Computers Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Computers External Articles
- Computers Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Computers Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Cleanup