Talk:Adventures of Huckleberry Finn: Difference between revisions
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
imported>Russell Potter (Huck, Mark, etc.) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I have to agree (and a hearty welcome back to you, Russell). An article about a novel should be far more than a summary. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 10:57, 18 February 2007 (CST) | I have to agree (and a hearty welcome back to you, Russell). An article about a novel should be far more than a summary. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 10:57, 18 February 2007 (CST) | ||
== Huck, Mark, etc. == | |||
Hi Larry -- well, ok, I couldn't resist lurking! | |||
I note that one of the red links in this article is Mark Twain himself -- whew! -- there's a tall order. But maybe one way to jump-start the Literature articles would be to send an e-mail invitation to some established authorities on Mark Twain (or any other similar major literary figure), and invite them to write the main entry article from scratch. In cases where you found a willing participant, these kinds of main entries would at least give CZ a type and quality of content that WP lacks. | |||
[[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 08:34, 19 February 2007 (CST) |
Revision as of 08:34, 19 February 2007
What is the purpose of placing this summary as the start of an entry on the novel?
Russell Potter 20:42, 13 February 2007 (CST)
I have to agree (and a hearty welcome back to you, Russell). An article about a novel should be far more than a summary. --Larry Sanger 10:57, 18 February 2007 (CST)
Huck, Mark, etc.
Hi Larry -- well, ok, I couldn't resist lurking!
I note that one of the red links in this article is Mark Twain himself -- whew! -- there's a tall order. But maybe one way to jump-start the Literature articles would be to send an e-mail invitation to some established authorities on Mark Twain (or any other similar major literary figure), and invite them to write the main entry article from scratch. In cases where you found a willing participant, these kinds of main entries would at least give CZ a type and quality of content that WP lacks.
Russell Potter 08:34, 19 February 2007 (CST)