Talk:Anemia: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Thomas E Kelly No edit summary |
imported>Thomas E Kelly No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
decreased prod, increased destr, ineffect prod, acute blood loss, redistr. My prof calls these each "forest." Then you go the the "tree" which is for example, aplastic anemia, then you go to the type "the leaves"... induced by drugs, ex. chloremphemical (sp?) [[User:Thomas E Kelly|-Tom Kelly]] [[User talk:Thomas E Kelly|(Talk)]] | decreased prod, increased destr, ineffect prod, acute blood loss, redistr. My prof calls these each "forest." Then you go the the "tree" which is for example, aplastic anemia, then you go to the type "the leaves"... induced by drugs, ex. chloremphemical (sp?) [[User:Thomas E Kelly|-Tom Kelly]] [[User talk:Thomas E Kelly|(Talk)]] | ||
Bleeding (without further explanation like internal(?)) is not considered excess destruction since you LDH and Bili would be normal. [[User:Thomas E Kelly|-Tom Kelly]] [[User talk:Thomas E Kelly|(Talk)]] 19:14, 11 February 2007 (CST) | Bleeding (without further explanation like internal(?)) is not considered excess destruction since you LDH and Bili would be normal... correct? [[User:Thomas E Kelly|-Tom Kelly]] [[User talk:Thomas E Kelly|(Talk)]] 19:14, 11 February 2007 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 19:24, 11 February 2007
Start by listing the Kinetics and Mechanisms of Anemias decreased prod, increased destr, ineffect prod, acute blood loss, redistr. My prof calls these each "forest." Then you go the the "tree" which is for example, aplastic anemia, then you go to the type "the leaves"... induced by drugs, ex. chloremphemical (sp?) -Tom Kelly (Talk)
Bleeding (without further explanation like internal(?)) is not considered excess destruction since you LDH and Bili would be normal... correct? -Tom Kelly (Talk) 19:14, 11 February 2007 (CST)