Talk:Scientific journal: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>DavidGoodman
(pls dont delete.)
imported>Bruce M. Tindall
mNo edit summary
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
It might be a good idea to combine Academic journal and Scientific journal on CZ. I didn't try to do it on WP because of the links & idiosyncrasies[[User:DavidGoodman|DavidGoodman]] 21:39, 6 November 2006 (CST)
It might be a good idea to combine Academic journal and Scientific journal on CZ. I didn't try to do it on WP because of the links & idiosyncrasies[[User:DavidGoodman|DavidGoodman]] 21:39, 6 November 2006 (CST)
:Article has been worked on -- please do not delete.
:Article has been worked on -- please do not delete.
In the "Electronic publishing" section I read: "scientific journals increasing print accepted articles online", which I fail to understand. Because of my poor English? Or something is wrong in the phrase?
The same question about section "Controversies", the phrase "authors may to continue to cite older results from observations studies are their refutation".
[[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 16:50, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
:It was probably intended to say "scientific journals ''increasingly'' print accepted articles online," i.e., it is becoming more and more common that when a journal accepts an article, it then publishes the article online. [[User:Bruce M. Tindall|Bruce M. Tindall]] 17:00, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
::I see, thanks. Hope you (or someone) will correct it. Also, "publish online" is probably more clear than "print online". [[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 17:03, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
:In the second sentence, it might have been intended to say something like "authors may continue to cite older results from [<s>observations</s>] studies ''after'' their refutation." I'm not sure whether my conjectures are correct, but the original author seems to be active on CZ today so perhaps he will take a look at these sentences and change them. [[User:Bruce M. Tindall|Bruce M. Tindall]] 17:08, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
== Other Science Workgroups? ==
Should we tag with other science workgroups? [[User:Thomas E Kelly|-Tom Kelly]] [[User talk:Thomas E Kelly|(Talk)]] 13:27, 18 March 2007 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 11:11, 25 October 2010

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Catalogs [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  A publication venue for original research and scholarly review articles — for more than three centuries on paper and now increasingly online. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories:  Library and Information Science, Physics and Health Sciences [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  American English

It might be a good idea to combine Academic journal and Scientific journal on CZ. I didn't try to do it on WP because of the links & idiosyncrasiesDavidGoodman 21:39, 6 November 2006 (CST)

Article has been worked on -- please do not delete.

In the "Electronic publishing" section I read: "scientific journals increasing print accepted articles online", which I fail to understand. Because of my poor English? Or something is wrong in the phrase?

The same question about section "Controversies", the phrase "authors may to continue to cite older results from observations studies are their refutation".

Boris Tsirelson 16:50, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

It was probably intended to say "scientific journals increasingly print accepted articles online," i.e., it is becoming more and more common that when a journal accepts an article, it then publishes the article online. Bruce M. Tindall 17:00, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
I see, thanks. Hope you (or someone) will correct it. Also, "publish online" is probably more clear than "print online". Boris Tsirelson 17:03, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
In the second sentence, it might have been intended to say something like "authors may continue to cite older results from [observations] studies after their refutation." I'm not sure whether my conjectures are correct, but the original author seems to be active on CZ today so perhaps he will take a look at these sentences and change them. Bruce M. Tindall 17:08, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Other Science Workgroups?

Should we tag with other science workgroups? -Tom Kelly (Talk) 13:27, 18 March 2007 (CDT)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Scientific_journal&oldid=9206"