Talk:Stephen King: Difference between revisions
imported>Larry Sanger (Please let's put only articles into "CZ Live") |
Pat Palmer (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | |||
== very old post without a header == | |||
The Stephen King article is being revised as a direct result of the request by LS that we each find a page to rewrite and reorganize. This page certainly needs it, and King deserves better. | The Stephen King article is being revised as a direct result of the request by LS that we each find a page to rewrite and reorganize. This page certainly needs it, and King deserves better. | ||
This rewrite is a work in progress, beginning with the article as it was on Wikipedia, and slowly cleaning it up, adding information, reorganizing it and generally bringing it up to standards. Comments are more than welcome on the talk page and, given my personal schedule, I expect the effort to take a suprisingly long time. [[User:Jesse Liberty|Jesse Liberty]] 21:42, 31 October 2006 (CST) | This rewrite is a work in progress, beginning with the article as it was on Wikipedia, and slowly cleaning it up, adding information, reorganizing it and generally bringing it up to standards. Comments are more than welcome on the talk page and, given my personal schedule, I expect the effort to take a suprisingly long time. [[User:Jesse Liberty|Jesse Liberty]] 21:42, 31 October 2006 (CST) | ||
== seriously needs improvement == | |||
This is an awful article, but I'm leaving it here for the moment just so there's something. The version in WP is more complete at this time. This needs a complete revamping, but I don't have time to do it, and although I admire King's writing, his topics are not really my thing anyway. [[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] ([[User talk:Pat Palmer|talk]]) 18:14, 18 February 2024 (CST) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:14, 18 February 2024
very old post without a header
The Stephen King article is being revised as a direct result of the request by LS that we each find a page to rewrite and reorganize. This page certainly needs it, and King deserves better.
This rewrite is a work in progress, beginning with the article as it was on Wikipedia, and slowly cleaning it up, adding information, reorganizing it and generally bringing it up to standards. Comments are more than welcome on the talk page and, given my personal schedule, I expect the effort to take a suprisingly long time. Jesse Liberty 21:42, 31 October 2006 (CST)
seriously needs improvement
This is an awful article, but I'm leaving it here for the moment just so there's something. The version in WP is more complete at this time. This needs a complete revamping, but I don't have time to do it, and although I admire King's writing, his topics are not really my thing anyway. Pat Palmer (talk) 18:14, 18 February 2024 (CST)