Natrium reactor: Difference between revisions
imported>David MacQuigg (→Safety: add critiques from Scientific American article) |
(add figure showing annular fuel rod) |
||
| (23 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
{{ | {{Image|Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor.png|right|350px|Sodium Cooled Fast Reactor.}} | ||
{{ | {{Image|Natrium fuel.png|right|350px|Improved fuel rod design allows higher burnup.}} | ||
The '''Natrium reactor''' is a [[Fast neutron reactor|Fast Neutron Reactor]] using uranium metal as the fuel and molten sodium as the coolant.<ref name=NatriumSite/> See [[Integral Fast Reactor]] for more discussion of the technology behind this design. | |||
This article will address the issues raised in the parent article [[Nuclear power reconsidered]]. | |||
{{TOC}} | |||
{{ | |||
== Safety == | == Safety == | ||
'''Accidental overheating.''' | '''Accidental overheating.''' The pool of molten sodium has enough heat capacity to absorb the decay heat if there is a total loss of power. Hot sodium will rise by convection and continue the flow of coolant through the core. Proponents of nuclear power call this "walk-away safe". | ||
'''Leakage of Radioactivity''' There are no penetrations that could leak in the vessel containing the primary sodium. Secondary sodium is non-radioactive, so a leak in that piping would not be a radiation hazard. The chamber containing sodium circuits can be flooded with argon to suppress any fires. | |||
''' | '''Sabotage''' The reactor vessel and all radioactive components are below ground level, under heavy concrete barriers. If a terrorist or rogue operator were to try and force a meltdown, the fuel in the rods would melt before the steel cladding and the reaction would stop.<ref name=fuelmelt/> Melted fuel would remain within the rods.<ref name=fueltest/> | ||
== Waste Management == | == Waste Management == | ||
Fast Neutron Reactors can achieve a much higher burnup of the fuel, resulting in fewer grams of spent fuel per megawatt-day compared to Light Water Reactors.<ref name=burnup/><br> | |||
Metal fuel is more easily recycled that standard oxide fuels. This provides much more power from the same fuel.<ref name=recycling/><br> | |||
In a [[Fast neutron reactor|Fast Neutron Reactor]] most fission products can go back into the reactor with the recycled fuel, reducing the High Level Waste stream.<ref name=lessHLW/><br> | |||
Long-lived actinides are greatly reduced in a Fast Neutron Reactor.<ref name=lessActinides/> | |||
== Weapons Proliferation == | == Weapons Proliferation == | ||
Uranium is never more than 20% enriched. Plutonium is burned as fast as it is produced. While it may be possible to extract from the spent fuel a small amount of plutonium, it is contaminated with radioactive nuclides unsuitable for [[Nuclear_proliferation|bomb making]]. A rogue dictator will find it much easier to go the route of every other rogue so far, just buy centrifuges and enrich uranium. | |||
== Cost == | == Cost == | ||
'''Plant cost per KW:'''<br/> | Specs for a 500MWe plant:<br/> | ||
'''Operating cost per | '''Plant cost per KW (including building but not land, permits or licensing):'''<br/> | ||
'''Operating cost per KWh (including fuel and maintenance):'''<br/> | |||
'''Initial fuel load:'''<br/> | |||
'''Fuel consumption per day:'''<br/> | |||
== Further Reading == | |||
''PLENTIFUL ENERGY The Story of the Integral Fast Reactor'', CHARLES E. TILL and YOON IL CHANG, 2011. | |||
[http://www.thesciencecouncil.com/pdfs/PlentifulEnergy.pdf] A thorough presentation of the design and testing of a metal-fueled, sodium-cooled fast reactor. | |||
== Notes and References == | == Notes and References == | ||
{{Reflist| | {{Reflist|refs= | ||
<ref name=burnup> text here | |||
</ref> | |||
<ref name=fuelmelt> text here | |||
</ref> | |||
<ref name=fueltest> text here | |||
</ref> | |||
<ref name=lessActinides> text here | |||
</ref> | |||
<ref name=lessHLW> text here | |||
</ref> | |||
<ref name=NatriumSite>[https://natriumpower.com NatriumPower.com] | |||
</ref> | |||
<ref name=recycling> text here | |||
</ref> | |||
}} | |||
Latest revision as of 14:13, 12 November 2023
The Natrium reactor is a Fast Neutron Reactor using uranium metal as the fuel and molten sodium as the coolant.[1] See Integral Fast Reactor for more discussion of the technology behind this design.
This article will address the issues raised in the parent article Nuclear power reconsidered.
Safety
Accidental overheating. The pool of molten sodium has enough heat capacity to absorb the decay heat if there is a total loss of power. Hot sodium will rise by convection and continue the flow of coolant through the core. Proponents of nuclear power call this "walk-away safe".
Leakage of Radioactivity There are no penetrations that could leak in the vessel containing the primary sodium. Secondary sodium is non-radioactive, so a leak in that piping would not be a radiation hazard. The chamber containing sodium circuits can be flooded with argon to suppress any fires.
Sabotage The reactor vessel and all radioactive components are below ground level, under heavy concrete barriers. If a terrorist or rogue operator were to try and force a meltdown, the fuel in the rods would melt before the steel cladding and the reaction would stop.[2] Melted fuel would remain within the rods.[3]
Waste Management
Fast Neutron Reactors can achieve a much higher burnup of the fuel, resulting in fewer grams of spent fuel per megawatt-day compared to Light Water Reactors.[4]
Metal fuel is more easily recycled that standard oxide fuels. This provides much more power from the same fuel.[5]
In a Fast Neutron Reactor most fission products can go back into the reactor with the recycled fuel, reducing the High Level Waste stream.[6]
Long-lived actinides are greatly reduced in a Fast Neutron Reactor.[7]
Weapons Proliferation
Uranium is never more than 20% enriched. Plutonium is burned as fast as it is produced. While it may be possible to extract from the spent fuel a small amount of plutonium, it is contaminated with radioactive nuclides unsuitable for bomb making. A rogue dictator will find it much easier to go the route of every other rogue so far, just buy centrifuges and enrich uranium.
Cost
Specs for a 500MWe plant:
Plant cost per KW (including building but not land, permits or licensing):
Operating cost per KWh (including fuel and maintenance):
Initial fuel load:
Fuel consumption per day:
Further Reading
PLENTIFUL ENERGY The Story of the Integral Fast Reactor, CHARLES E. TILL and YOON IL CHANG, 2011. [1] A thorough presentation of the design and testing of a metal-fueled, sodium-cooled fast reactor.