Language Evolution (book synopsis)/Bibliography: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Anthony.Sebastian (add item) |
imported>Anthony.Sebastian (→Journal articles: add pub date) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
== | ==Journal articles== | ||
* Christiansen MH, Kirby S. (2003) [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00136-0 Language evolution: consensus and controversies]. ''Trends Cogn Sci''. 7:300-307. | |||
* Christiansen MH, Kirby S. Language evolution: consensus and controversies. ''Trends Cogn Sci''. 7:300-307. | |||
** <font face="Gill Sans MT"><u>Abstract</u>: Why is language the way it is? How did language come to be this way? And why is our species alone in having complex language? These are old unsolved questions that have seen a renaissance in the dramatic recent growth in research being published on the origins and evolution of human language. This review provides a broad overview of some of the important current work in this area. We highlight new methodologies (such as computational modeling), emerging points of consensus (such as the importance of pre-adaptation), and the major remaining controversies (such as gestural origins of language). We also discuss why language evolution is such a difficult problem, and suggest probable directions research may take in the near future.</font> | ** <font face="Gill Sans MT"><u>Abstract</u>: Why is language the way it is? How did language come to be this way? And why is our species alone in having complex language? These are old unsolved questions that have seen a renaissance in the dramatic recent growth in research being published on the origins and evolution of human language. This review provides a broad overview of some of the important current work in this area. We highlight new methodologies (such as computational modeling), emerging points of consensus (such as the importance of pre-adaptation), and the major remaining controversies (such as gestural origins of language). We also discuss why language evolution is such a difficult problem, and suggest probable directions research may take in the near future.</font> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:43, 6 October 2013
- Please sort and annotate in a user-friendly manner. For formatting, consider using automated reference wikification.
Journal articles
- Christiansen MH, Kirby S. (2003) Language evolution: consensus and controversies. Trends Cogn Sci. 7:300-307.
- Abstract: Why is language the way it is? How did language come to be this way? And why is our species alone in having complex language? These are old unsolved questions that have seen a renaissance in the dramatic recent growth in research being published on the origins and evolution of human language. This review provides a broad overview of some of the important current work in this area. We highlight new methodologies (such as computational modeling), emerging points of consensus (such as the importance of pre-adaptation), and the major remaining controversies (such as gestural origins of language). We also discuss why language evolution is such a difficult problem, and suggest probable directions research may take in the near future.