User:Anthony.Sebastian/Sbox04-sndsym: Difference between revisions
imported>Anthony.Sebastian |
No edit summary |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{AccountNotLive}} | |||
==Foreword== | ==Foreword== | ||
The linguistic term, <b>sound symbolism</b>, refers to meaning inherent in the sound of speech, a ''direct linkage between sound and meaning'',<ref name=hinton1994/> the sound a symbol for a meaning, exemplified trivially by the speech sound, “ow”, meaning something like, “that hurts”. | The linguistic term, <b>sound symbolism</b>, refers to meaning inherent in the sound of speech, inherent in the sense of the meaning as implicit in the 'shape' of the sound, a ''direct linkage between sound and meaning'',<ref name=hinton1994/> the sound a symbol for a meaning, exemplified trivially by the speech sound, “ow”, meaning something like, “that hurts”. The concept that some speech sounds have recognizably inherent meaning contrasts with the traditional concept of meaning attached to speech sounds through arbitrary convention. | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
<p style="margin-left: 2%; margin-right: 6%; font-size: 1.0em; font-family: Gill Sans MT, Trebuchet MS;">Sound symbolism is the term for a hypothesized systematic relationship between sound and meaning.<ref name=hinton1994/> The idea that there might be a non-arbitrary relationship between the physical aspect of a speech signal and its meaning is quite an old idea, dating back at least to the time of Plato who, in his work Cratylus, had Socrates debating with two pupils the issue of whether the names for things are arbitrary or whether instead they are a natural reflection of the things named…I believe that phonetic studies -- combined with principles emerging from ethology, the science of comparative behavior -- can provide a novel basis for further informed speculation on this issue. Moreover, the principles applied to this topic can also elucidate several other controversial topics including the cause of universal patterns in intonation, the origin of certain facial expressions involving the mouth, the reason for sexual dimorphism of the vocal anatomy in humans (and other species), and whether the human vocal anatomy shows any adaptation special to speech.<ref name=ohala1997/></p> | <p style="margin-left: 2%; margin-right: 6%; font-size: 1.0em; font-family: Gill Sans MT, Trebuchet MS;">Sound symbolism is the term for a hypothesized systematic relationship between sound and meaning.<ref name=hinton1994/> The idea that there might be a non-arbitrary relationship between the physical aspect of a speech signal and its meaning is quite an old idea, dating back at least to the time of Plato who, in his work Cratylus, had Socrates debating with two pupils the issue of whether the names for things are arbitrary or whether instead they are a natural reflection of the things named…I believe that phonetic studies -- combined with principles emerging from ethology, the science of comparative behavior -- can provide a novel basis for further informed speculation on this issue. Moreover, the principles applied to this topic can also elucidate several other controversial topics including the cause of universal patterns in intonation, the origin of certain facial expressions involving the mouth, the reason for sexual dimorphism of the vocal anatomy in humans (and other species), and whether the human vocal anatomy shows any adaptation special to speech.<ref name=ohala1997/></p> | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
The term, sound symbolism, also refers to the discipline that studies and teaches of the relationship between the sound of a vocalization and the meaning of the sound. The discipline classifies sound-symbolic relationships into a typology, and explores the nature of the different types, their relatedness, and their broader implications for linguistics and biology. | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{ | {{reflist3 test|refs= | ||
<ref name=hinton1994>Hinton L, Nichols J, Ohala JJ. (1994) ''Sound Symbolism''. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521026772 (2006 Paperback Edition). | [http://books.google.com/books?id=Uov84NavOR8C&source=gbs_navlinks_s Google Books preview]. | <ref name=hinton1994>Hinton L, Nichols J, Ohala JJ. (1994) ''Sound Symbolism''. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521026772 (2006 Paperback Edition). | [http://books.google.com/books?id=Uov84NavOR8C&source=gbs_navlinks_s Google Books preview].</ref> | ||
<ref name=ohala1997>Ohala JJ. (1997) [http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/phonlab/users/ohala/papers/SEOUL4-symbolism.pdf Sound symbolism]. ''Proc. 4th Seoul International Conference on Linguistics [SICOL]'' 11-15 Aug 1997. pp. 98-103.</ref> | <ref name=ohala1997>Ohala JJ. (1997) [http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/phonlab/users/ohala/papers/SEOUL4-symbolism.pdf Sound symbolism]. ''Proc. 4th Seoul International Conference on Linguistics [SICOL]'' 11-15 Aug 1997. pp. 98-103.</ref> | ||
| Line 19: | Line 22: | ||
}} | }} | ||
<! | <!-- TitleIdeophones http://books.google.com/books?id=ivuSe0tzJZkC&source=gbs_navlinks_s | ||
Volume 44 of Typological studies in languageAuthorsErhard Friedrich Karl Voeltz, Christa Kilian-HatzEditorsErhard Friedrich Karl Voeltz, Christa Kilian-HatzEditionillustratedPublisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Company, 2001ISBN9027229465, 9789027229465 --> | Volume 44 of Typological studies in languageAuthorsErhard Friedrich Karl Voeltz, Christa Kilian-HatzEditorsErhard Friedrich Karl Voeltz, Christa Kilian-HatzEditionillustratedPublisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Company, 2001ISBN9027229465, 9789027229465 --> | ||
Latest revision as of 01:52, 22 November 2023
The account of this former contributor was not re-activated after the server upgrade of March 2022.
Foreword
The linguistic term, sound symbolism, refers to meaning inherent in the sound of speech, inherent in the sense of the meaning as implicit in the 'shape' of the sound, a direct linkage between sound and meaning,[1] the sound a symbol for a meaning, exemplified trivially by the speech sound, “ow”, meaning something like, “that hurts”. The concept that some speech sounds have recognizably inherent meaning contrasts with the traditional concept of meaning attached to speech sounds through arbitrary convention.
Sound symbolism is the term for a hypothesized systematic relationship between sound and meaning.[1] The idea that there might be a non-arbitrary relationship between the physical aspect of a speech signal and its meaning is quite an old idea, dating back at least to the time of Plato who, in his work Cratylus, had Socrates debating with two pupils the issue of whether the names for things are arbitrary or whether instead they are a natural reflection of the things named…I believe that phonetic studies -- combined with principles emerging from ethology, the science of comparative behavior -- can provide a novel basis for further informed speculation on this issue. Moreover, the principles applied to this topic can also elucidate several other controversial topics including the cause of universal patterns in intonation, the origin of certain facial expressions involving the mouth, the reason for sexual dimorphism of the vocal anatomy in humans (and other species), and whether the human vocal anatomy shows any adaptation special to speech.[2]
The term, sound symbolism, also refers to the discipline that studies and teaches of the relationship between the sound of a vocalization and the meaning of the sound. The discipline classifies sound-symbolic relationships into a typology, and explores the nature of the different types, their relatedness, and their broader implications for linguistics and biology.
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Hinton L, Nichols J, Ohala JJ. (1994) Sound Symbolism. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521026772 (2006 Paperback Edition). | Google Books preview.
- ↑ Ohala JJ. (1997) Sound symbolism. Proc. 4th Seoul International Conference on Linguistics [SICOL] 11-15 Aug 1997. pp. 98-103.