Talk:Biot–Savart law: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>John R. Brews
(Talk page generated using Special:MetadataForm)
 
imported>David Finn
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
*Transferred from Talk:Biot-Savart law 2011-04-22. Prior history of the page is [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Biot-Savart_law&action=history here]. [[User:John R. Brews|John R. Brews]] 09:46, 7 May 2011 (CDT)
B&S wrote ''réciproque'' because their formula contains a 1/R (not a 1/R²) dependence; see the present article. --[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 01:31, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
==Ungrammatical title==
As apparently B&S are indeed two people, the title is wrong. It should be Biot–Savart Law. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 11:27, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
:Change made. [[User:John R. Brews|John R. Brews]] 14:29, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
::I don't understand the difference. Would anyone be able to explain it to me before I fix all the double redirects that go with the page move? [[User:David Finn|David Finn]]
:::A hyphenated surname of a single person, e.g. Baldwin-Edwards, is written with a hyphen. For clarity, if two people are represented, as here, it's better to use an en rule instead. In such a case, "Biot–Savart's law", the previous title, is a solecism, at least in English. The French themselves seem to have no qualms about writing "la loi de Biot–Savart". [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 14:08, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
::::Ah, I see now. I had not heard of en rules and had difficulty at first spotting the difference. Now that you have explained it I can fix any other titles I might come across with the same problem. Thanks for the reply! [[User:David Finn|David Finn]] 14:18, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 08:18, 20 November 2011

This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  Formula providing the magnetic flux density generated by a wire carrying a direct current as a function of distance from the wire. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories:  Engineering, Physics and Astronomy [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  American English
  • Transferred from Talk:Biot-Savart law 2011-04-22. Prior history of the page is here. John R. Brews 09:46, 7 May 2011 (CDT)

B&S wrote réciproque because their formula contains a 1/R (not a 1/R²) dependence; see the present article. --Paul Wormer 01:31, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Ungrammatical title

As apparently B&S are indeed two people, the title is wrong. It should be Biot–Savart Law. Peter Jackson 11:27, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Change made. John R. Brews 14:29, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
I don't understand the difference. Would anyone be able to explain it to me before I fix all the double redirects that go with the page move? David Finn
A hyphenated surname of a single person, e.g. Baldwin-Edwards, is written with a hyphen. For clarity, if two people are represented, as here, it's better to use an en rule instead. In such a case, "Biot–Savart's law", the previous title, is a solecism, at least in English. The French themselves seem to have no qualms about writing "la loi de Biot–Savart". Peter Jackson 14:08, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Ah, I see now. I had not heard of en rules and had difficulty at first spotting the difference. Now that you have explained it I can fix any other titles I might come across with the same problem. Thanks for the reply! David Finn 14:18, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Biot–Savart_law&oldid=759097"