Talk:Angel (Biblical): Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Sandy Harris
(New page: {{subpages}} == Questions == Why does this exist as a separate page? As I see it, the Angel article covers the ground; parts of this might be moved there, then this deleted. We do no...)
 
imported>Sandy Harris
 
Line 7: Line 7:
The Bible citations are problematic. There are far too many to be reasonable as footnotes. Is there not some convention that allows citations like [Job 13:2] or whatever?
The Bible citations are problematic. There are far too many to be reasonable as footnotes. Is there not some convention that allows citations like [Job 13:2] or whatever?


The "further reading" section has two problems. One is that CZ does not use such sections; there are subpages for such things, in this case [[Angel_(Biblical)/Bibliography]] and [[Angel_(Biblical)/External_Links]]. The other is that the links seem inappropriate; they are to sites which seem to have an obvious fundamentalist bias. Far better to use scholarly sites, or even links to major churches. [[User:Sandy Harris|Sandy Harris]] 07:21, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
The "further reading" section has two problems. One is that CZ does not use such sections; there are subpages for such things, in this case [[Angel_(Biblical)/Bibliography]] and [[Angel_(Biblical)/External_Links]]. The other is that the links seem inappropriate; they are to sites which seem to have an obvious fundamentalist agenda. Far better to use scholarly sites, or even links to major churches. [[User:Sandy Harris|Sandy Harris]] 07:21, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 01:21, 12 March 2011

This article is developed but not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Definition [?]
 Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  Please add a brief definition or description.
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category:  Religion [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  American English
To do.

Metadata here


Questions

Why does this exist as a separate page? As I see it, the Angel article covers the ground; parts of this might be moved there, then this deleted. We do not need a detailed account based on one interpretation of the Bible.

The Bible citations are problematic. There are far too many to be reasonable as footnotes. Is there not some convention that allows citations like [Job 13:2] or whatever?

The "further reading" section has two problems. One is that CZ does not use such sections; there are subpages for such things, in this case Angel_(Biblical)/Bibliography and Angel_(Biblical)/External_Links. The other is that the links seem inappropriate; they are to sites which seem to have an obvious fundamentalist agenda. Far better to use scholarly sites, or even links to major churches. Sandy Harris 07:21, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Angel_(Biblical)&oldid=757905"