Superior orders: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Article 8 of the Nuremberg Charter states " "The fact that the defendant acted pursuant to an order of his Government or of a superior shall not free him from responsibility, but may be considered in mitigation of punishment, if the Tribunal determines that justice so requires."<ref>{{citation | Article 8 of the Nuremberg Charter states " "The fact that the defendant acted pursuant to an order of his Government or of a superior shall not free him from responsibility, but may be considered in mitigation of punishment, if the Tribunal determines that justice so requires."<ref>{{citation | ||
| title = | | title = Charter of the International Military Tribunal | ||
| url = http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/imtconst.asp#art8 | |||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}}[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]] | ||
Latest revision as of 11:01, 23 October 2024
As a legal defense against war crime charges, the doctrine of superior orders holds that an individual cannot be held responsible for actions that were ordered by a superior officer. The doctrine was generally rejected by the Nuremberg Trials, but has been challenged since.
Article 8 of the Nuremberg Charter states " "The fact that the defendant acted pursuant to an order of his Government or of a superior shall not free him from responsibility, but may be considered in mitigation of punishment, if the Tribunal determines that justice so requires."[1]
In the statute authorizing the International Criminal Court, Article 33 reads :
- 1 The fact that a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court has been committed by a person pursuant to an order of a Government or of a superior, whether military or civilian, shall not relieve that person of criminal responsibility unless :
- (a) The person was under a legal obligation to obey orders of the Government or the superior in question ;
- (b) The person did not know that the order was unlawful ; and
- (c) The order was not manifestly unlawful.
- 2. For the purposes of this article, orders to commit genocide or crimes against humanity are manifestly unlawful.”[2]
References
- ↑ Charter of the International Military Tribunal
- ↑ Charles Garraway (31 December 1999), "Superior orders and the International Criminal Court: Justice delivered or justice denied", International Review of the Red Cross