Talk:Hypothesis/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Eric Toombs
(The Definition)
 
imported>John Stephenson
m (John Stephenson moved page Talk:Hypothesis to Talk:Hypothesis/Archive 1 without leaving a redirect: Discussion about a different article merged with this one)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== The Definition ==
{{archive box}}
== Merger with [[Hypothesis]] ==


I'm shaky on the exact definition. There may be more to it than what I wrote.<br />
Immediately after having written this, I have decided to merge this into [[Hypothesis]], which incidentally could use a lot of work as well. I don't know how to do so, though.<br/>
[[User:Eric Toombs|Eric Toombs]] 03:32, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
[[User:Eric Toombs|Eric Toombs]] 04:23, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 
:(Irrespective of the merger) Interestingly, falsifiabilty was also mentioned (by me, not long ago) in [[Entanglement (physics)#Falsifiabilty, and no-conspiracy assumption]]. [[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 22:00, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 07:36, 6 October 2020

Merger with Hypothesis

Immediately after having written this, I have decided to merge this into Hypothesis, which incidentally could use a lot of work as well. I don't know how to do so, though.
Eric Toombs 04:23, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

(Irrespective of the merger) Interestingly, falsifiabilty was also mentioned (by me, not long ago) in Entanglement (physics)#Falsifiabilty, and no-conspiracy assumption. Boris Tsirelson 22:00, 19 October 2010 (UTC)