CZ:Charter/Things to address: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen
m (typo)
imported>Jess Key
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<code><div class="usermessage plainlinks">This page and its parent page are dedicated to [[CZ:Charter drafting committee|drafting a charter for Citizendium]] and should only be edited by those [http://forum.citizendium.org/index.php/topic,2929.msg24710.html eight Citizens elected to the drafting Committee]. Other [[CZ:Citizen|Citizens]], please comment on the dedicated thread at the [http://forum.citizendium.org/index.php/topic,2930.0.html Citizen Forum]. Non-Citizens can comment in a separate thread at the [http://forum.citizendium.org/index.php/topic,2931.0.html non-Member Forum]. The drafting period shall end when November 12, 2009 is over all around the globe.</div></code>
{{CZ-Charter-drafting}}


Starting this page to place some of the things that we can address, or at least provide a way to address these things, in the charter. This may include things that should be institutionalized but not directly in the charter, which are collected at [[CZ:Charter drafting/Things to address but not in charter]].
Starting this page to place some of the things that we can address, or at least provide a way to address these things, in the charter. This may include things that should be institutionalized but not directly in the charter, which are collected at [[CZ:Charter drafting/Things to address but not in charter]].
Line 5: Line 5:
#dispute resolution concerning content, behaviour or technical matters  
#dispute resolution concerning content, behaviour or technical matters  
#The judicial process
#The judicial process
#Who gets to decide about editorship?
#Who gets to decide about editorship? Ed council
#Who gets to decide about new technical features, e.g. subpage types?
#Who gets to decide about technical features, e.g. new subpage types?  Ed Council
#Quorum. What would be a sufficient mimimum number of members to be termed a 'quorum' on Citizendium?
#Rights and responsibilities of each role (authors, editors, <s>E-i-C</s>, constables, etc.)
#Checks and Balances on the powers of the Constabulary and Ed Council.
#Who makes up the editorial council
#Author obligation to make best effort at neutrality, or at least to recognize when a partisan view is stated; not Editor job to take advocacy positions and "neutralize". Stated alternatively, this is not a place for advocacy
#Reliability marking on articles/data
#Alliances (e.g., could we be the publication place of record for a professional group that primarily does presentations and mailing lists?)
#Granularity of expertise/workgroups -- who and how decided?

Latest revision as of 22:21, 22 September 2010

This page is dedicated to drafting a charter for Citizendium and should only be edited by those eight Citizens elected to the drafting Committee. The talk page is also reserved for them to discuss the evolution of the document. Other Citizens, please comment on the dedicated thread at the Citizen Forum. Non-Citizens can comment in a separate thread at the non-Member Forum.

This is the final version of the document drafted by the Charter drafting Committee. It shall be subject to a public vote.

Starting this page to place some of the things that we can address, or at least provide a way to address these things, in the charter. This may include things that should be institutionalized but not directly in the charter, which are collected at CZ:Charter drafting/Things to address but not in charter.

  1. dispute resolution concerning content, behaviour or technical matters
  2. The judicial process
  3. Who gets to decide about editorship? Ed council
  4. Who gets to decide about technical features, e.g. new subpage types? Ed Council
  5. Quorum. What would be a sufficient mimimum number of members to be termed a 'quorum' on Citizendium?
  6. Rights and responsibilities of each role (authors, editors, E-i-C, constables, etc.)
  7. Checks and Balances on the powers of the Constabulary and Ed Council.
  8. Who makes up the editorial council
  9. Author obligation to make best effort at neutrality, or at least to recognize when a partisan view is stated; not Editor job to take advocacy positions and "neutralize". Stated alternatively, this is not a place for advocacy
  10. Reliability marking on articles/data
  11. Alliances (e.g., could we be the publication place of record for a professional group that primarily does presentations and mailing lists?)
  12. Granularity of expertise/workgroups -- who and how decided?
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=CZ:Charter/Things_to_address&oldid=698356"