Physical system: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Paul Wormer
(New page: A '''physical system''' is the part of the universe that a physicist is interested in. Physics is a reductionist science meaning that a physicist restricts his<ref>For...)
 
mNo edit summary
 
(8 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
A '''physical system''' is the part of the universe that a physicist is interested in. [[Physics]] is a [[reductionism|reductionist]] science meaning that a physicist restricts his<ref>For linguistic reason we write "he" and "his" when referring to a physicist. This does not imply that physicists are necessarily male.</ref> studies to that part of the universe that is as simple as possible and yet shows&mdash;as far as he can see&mdash;all the physical phenomena that are essential to his study. This delimitation of his object of study is a ''conditio sine qua non''  in  understanding and
{{subpages}}
explaining his observations.
{{TOC|right}}
A '''physical system''' is the part of the universe that a physicist is interested in. What is not in the system is the environment or the ''surroundings''.
==Reduction==
[[Physics]] is a [[reductionism|reductionist]] science meaning that a physicist restricts his<ref>For linguistic reason we write "he" and "his" when referring to a physicist. This does not imply that physicists are necessarily male.</ref> studies to that part of the universe that is as simple as possible and yet shows&mdash;as far as he can see—all the physical phenomena that are essential to his study. Reduction is a ''conditio sine qua non''  in the explanation of observations and is essential for the progress in the understanding of nature.
==Idealization and abstraction==
Hand in hand with reduction go ''idealization'' and ''abstraction''. Non-physicists are often
amused and puzzled by the idealizations  that are common in physics. The  infinitely thin, infinitely strong, yet massless, rope from which hangs a heavy mass of infinitely small diameter is proverbial. Many  abstract, and consequently difficult, concepts  have entered physics over the last three centuries. It takes intellectual effort to get a grasp on abstractions as "an isolated physical system strives for maximum [[entropy (thermodynamics)|entropy]]" or "the [[wave function]] of a system collapses when a measurement is performed on it".  What exactly vibrates when a radio signal is emitted? Interested laymen are sometimes irritated by these abstractions that they conceive as unnecessary ''Wichtigmacherei'' (making oneself important) by physicists.


Hand in hand with ''reduction'' go ''idealization'' and ''abstraction''. Non-physicists are
==State and state variables==
amused by the idealizations commonly applied in physics. Many have heard in high
When a natural scientist chooses part of the universe as his physical system, i.e., as his object of
school of the proverbial infinitely thin, infinitely strong, yet massless, rope from which hangs a heavy mass of infinitely small diameter. Many non-physicists are  deterred by the abstractions that have entered physics over the last three centuries. What does it mean that a physical system strives for maximum [[entropy]] or that a [[wave function]] of a system collapses when measurements
study, he must define  at the same time  the variables that determine the ''state'' of the
are performed on it? What exactly vibrates when a radio signal is emitted? It takes
system. Without the concept of state and state variables the concept of physical system loses much of its meaning. When
physics students quite some time and effort before they can visualize in their minds these concepts.
[[Newton]] considered around 1666 a physical system consisting of the point masses [[Sun]]
Interested laymen are often irritated by the abstractions of physicists that they conceive
as unnecessary ''Wichtigmacherei'' (making important).
 
When a physicist separates part of the universe as his physical system, i.e., as his object of
study, then he must define  at the same time  the variables that determine the ''state'' of the
system. Without the concept of state the concept of physical system is valueless. When
[[Newton]] considered around 1666 his physical system to consist of the point masses [[Sun]]
and [[Earth]], he simultaneously assumed that the state of this system is uniquely
and [[Earth]], he simultaneously assumed that the state of this system is uniquely
determined by the position and the velocity of the Earth. In this he made the
determined by two (vector) state variables, namely the position and velocity of the Earth. Further, Newton made the idealizing assumptions that the Sun is at rest and that the diameters of Sun and Earth are of no importance and may be set equal to zero, although the masses of both planetary objects are non-zero (the crux of Newton's gravitational law). When Newton later explained the origin of the tides, the actual (non-zero) diameter of the Earth entered his description.
idealizing assumptions that the Sun is at rest and that the diameters of Sun and Earth are
==Time-dependence, causality, equations of motion==
of no importance and may be set equal to zero. (When Newton later explained the origin of
Most physical states are non-stationary, they change in time. The state variables—many of which are assumed to be observable (measurable)—develop in time. An important goal of physics is to discover the laws that predict the time development of the state of the physical system. It is always  assumed that the time development of a state is ''causal'', that is to say, time is ordered and a state at time ''t''<sub>0</sub> uniquely fixes the state at time ''t''<sub>1</sub> for ''t''<sub>1</sub> > ''t''<sub>0</sub>. The mathematical equations that describe the time-development of the state variables are the ''equations of motion''. Newton wrote down the law '''F''' = <i>m</i>'''a''' for the motion of a mass ''m'' and Schrödinger discovered ''H''&Psi;= ''i d&Psi;/dt'' for the causal time-development of a system's wave function &Psi;.  
the tides, the diameter of the Earth became, of course, non-negligible).
 
Most physical states are non-stationary, they develop in time. The pertinent parameters,
which&mdash;by another idealization&mdash;are assumed to be observable (measurable),
change in time. The main purpose of physics is to discover the laws that describe
the development in time of the state of the physical system. When a physicist sets himself to the task of discovering these laws, he makes the
assumption that the time development of a state is ''causal'', that is to say, that a state at certain
time uniquely fixes the state of the same system at a later time. Further he will search for
the mathematical equation that will describe the time development. This is the ''equation of motion'' of the physical system. Newton discovered by his study of two attracting masses
his famous second law '''F''' = ''m'' '''a''' and Schrödinger discovered ''H''&Psi;= ''i d&Psi;/dt'' for the causal development of the wave function &Psi; of a system consisting
of microscopic quantum particles.


We saw that a physical system does not have to be separated mechanically from the
Clearly, the goal of finding the equations of motion is a lofty one, but it must be emphasized that many systems are far too complex to even begin of thinking of formulating  equations of motion. Even so, the concept of state, state variables, and their development in time is of importance also for  complicated  systems where the relationships between state variables and their dependence on time cannot be caught in mathematical equations.
==Isolated, closed, and open systems==
We saw that a physical system does not have to be separated mechanically from the rest of the
universe. Indeed, it is evident that Newton did not put the Sun and the Earth inside a
universe. Indeed, it is evident that Newton did not put the Sun and the Earth inside a
vessel with adiabatic walls, in other words, a physical system is not
vessel with non-adiabatic walls. In other words, a physical system, although conceptually separated from the universe,  is not necessarily mechanically isolated from its surroundings. However, in practice it can be very convenient if a system is actually isolated, because the interpretation and explanation of
necessarily physically isolated from his environment. However, in practice it can be very
measurements are eased when it is certain that no interactions with the surroundings can influence the system.
convenient if it is separated, because it will aid the interpretation and explanation of
measurements when one is assured that certain interactions with the surroundings are not present.


It is usually not easy for an experimentator to separate a physical system from the rest
It is usually not easy for an experimentator to separate a physical system from the surroundings. For instance, a physical chemist studying a system consisting of
of the universe. For instance, a physical chemist studying a system consisting of
molecules will try to observe only the molecules that he is interested in, and will try to
molecules will try to observe only the molecules that he is interested in, and will try to
reduce the number of other molecules. Thus, he needs very thorough purification and/or
reduce the number of other ("surrounding") molecules in the system. Thus, a thorough purification and/or high vacuum is needed. Usually, it will be necessary  to shield the molecules from unwanted external fields, such as electrostatic, magnetic, and gravitational fields. (The latter field cannot be shielded, but weightless conditions are possible in space stations). For a theoretician, on the
high vacuum. He will also try to shield the molecules from unwanted external fields, such as
electrostatic, magnetic, and gravitational fields. (The latter field cannot be shielded,
but weightless conditions are possible in space stations). For a theoretician, on the
other hand, the definition of an isolated physical system is trivial, it is just the part of the
other hand, the definition of an isolated physical system is trivial, it is just the part of the
universe (matter and fields) that he considers in his equations.
universe (matter and fields) that he considers in his equations.


The conceptually most important physical system is the ''closed system'', where it assumed that there
As stated, the system that is easiest to study is the ''isolated system'', where it assumed that there
is no interaction with the rest of the universe. No energy or matter can flow in or out of
is no interaction whatever with the rest of the universe. No matter or [[heat]]  can flow in or out of an isolated system. Obviously,  completely isolated systems are of no interest to experimentalists, because no information leaves such a system and manipulation of the system is impossible because nothing enters an isolated system either. Thus, in the laboratory, physical systems are never completely isolated.  A ''closed system'' is a system that does not allow  exchange of ponderable matter with the surroundings, but heat may freely flow in or out. In an ''open'' system exchange of both heat and matter with the surroundings is allowed. For a theoretician the idealizing concept of an isolated system is of great importance and almost always applied, even in studies of closed or open systems. For instance, when a thermodynamicist considers a system with constant temperature and a constant number of molecules he assumes that his system (a closed  system, heat may flow in and out) is in temperature equilibrium with a very large heat bath. The "supersystem" consisting of the original system and the heat bath is an isolated physical system.
a closed system. Obviously,  completely closed systems are of no interest to experimental physicists, because no signals will leave such a system and he will not be able to manipulate the system because no signals will enter a closed system either. Thus, in the laboratory, physical systems are always partly open. For a theoretician the idealizing concept of closed system is of great importance and almost always applied, even in studies of open systems. For instance, when a thermodynamicist considers a system that is in temperature equilibrium with its environment (an open system, heat may flow in and out), he will assume it to be in a very large heat bath and the original system plus the heat bath is then again a closed physical system.


==Note==
==Note==
<references />
<references />[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]]

Latest revision as of 06:00, 4 October 2024

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

A physical system is the part of the universe that a physicist is interested in. What is not in the system is the environment or the surroundings.

Reduction

Physics is a reductionist science meaning that a physicist restricts his[1] studies to that part of the universe that is as simple as possible and yet shows—as far as he can see—all the physical phenomena that are essential to his study. Reduction is a conditio sine qua non in the explanation of observations and is essential for the progress in the understanding of nature.

Idealization and abstraction

Hand in hand with reduction go idealization and abstraction. Non-physicists are often amused and puzzled by the idealizations that are common in physics. The infinitely thin, infinitely strong, yet massless, rope from which hangs a heavy mass of infinitely small diameter is proverbial. Many abstract, and consequently difficult, concepts have entered physics over the last three centuries. It takes intellectual effort to get a grasp on abstractions as "an isolated physical system strives for maximum entropy" or "the wave function of a system collapses when a measurement is performed on it". What exactly vibrates when a radio signal is emitted? Interested laymen are sometimes irritated by these abstractions that they conceive as unnecessary Wichtigmacherei (making oneself important) by physicists.

State and state variables

When a natural scientist chooses part of the universe as his physical system, i.e., as his object of study, he must define at the same time the variables that determine the state of the system. Without the concept of state and state variables the concept of physical system loses much of its meaning. When Newton considered around 1666 a physical system consisting of the point masses Sun and Earth, he simultaneously assumed that the state of this system is uniquely determined by two (vector) state variables, namely the position and velocity of the Earth. Further, Newton made the idealizing assumptions that the Sun is at rest and that the diameters of Sun and Earth are of no importance and may be set equal to zero, although the masses of both planetary objects are non-zero (the crux of Newton's gravitational law). When Newton later explained the origin of the tides, the actual (non-zero) diameter of the Earth entered his description.

Time-dependence, causality, equations of motion

Most physical states are non-stationary, they change in time. The state variables—many of which are assumed to be observable (measurable)—develop in time. An important goal of physics is to discover the laws that predict the time development of the state of the physical system. It is always assumed that the time development of a state is causal, that is to say, time is ordered and a state at time t0 uniquely fixes the state at time t1 for t1 > t0. The mathematical equations that describe the time-development of the state variables are the equations of motion. Newton wrote down the law F = ma for the motion of a mass m and Schrödinger discovered HΨ= i dΨ/dt for the causal time-development of a system's wave function Ψ.

Clearly, the goal of finding the equations of motion is a lofty one, but it must be emphasized that many systems are far too complex to even begin of thinking of formulating equations of motion. Even so, the concept of state, state variables, and their development in time is of importance also for complicated systems where the relationships between state variables and their dependence on time cannot be caught in mathematical equations.

Isolated, closed, and open systems

We saw that a physical system does not have to be separated mechanically from the rest of the universe. Indeed, it is evident that Newton did not put the Sun and the Earth inside a vessel with non-adiabatic walls. In other words, a physical system, although conceptually separated from the universe, is not necessarily mechanically isolated from its surroundings. However, in practice it can be very convenient if a system is actually isolated, because the interpretation and explanation of measurements are eased when it is certain that no interactions with the surroundings can influence the system.

It is usually not easy for an experimentator to separate a physical system from the surroundings. For instance, a physical chemist studying a system consisting of molecules will try to observe only the molecules that he is interested in, and will try to reduce the number of other ("surrounding") molecules in the system. Thus, a thorough purification and/or high vacuum is needed. Usually, it will be necessary to shield the molecules from unwanted external fields, such as electrostatic, magnetic, and gravitational fields. (The latter field cannot be shielded, but weightless conditions are possible in space stations). For a theoretician, on the other hand, the definition of an isolated physical system is trivial, it is just the part of the universe (matter and fields) that he considers in his equations.

As stated, the system that is easiest to study is the isolated system, where it assumed that there is no interaction whatever with the rest of the universe. No matter or heat can flow in or out of an isolated system. Obviously, completely isolated systems are of no interest to experimentalists, because no information leaves such a system and manipulation of the system is impossible because nothing enters an isolated system either. Thus, in the laboratory, physical systems are never completely isolated. A closed system is a system that does not allow exchange of ponderable matter with the surroundings, but heat may freely flow in or out. In an open system exchange of both heat and matter with the surroundings is allowed. For a theoretician the idealizing concept of an isolated system is of great importance and almost always applied, even in studies of closed or open systems. For instance, when a thermodynamicist considers a system with constant temperature and a constant number of molecules he assumes that his system (a closed system, heat may flow in and out) is in temperature equilibrium with a very large heat bath. The "supersystem" consisting of the original system and the heat bath is an isolated physical system.

Note

  1. For linguistic reason we write "he" and "his" when referring to a physicist. This does not imply that physicists are necessarily male.