User:Peter Schmitt/Draft: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Peter Schmitt
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(18 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{AccountNotLive}}
<onlyinclude>[[{{NAMESPACE}}:{{BASEPAGENAME}}/{{{1}}}|{{{2}}}]]</onlyinclude>
<onlyinclude>[[{{NAMESPACE}}:{{BASEPAGENAME}}/{{{1}}}|{{{2}}}]]</onlyinclude>
http://rsnr.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/59/3/285.full Cayley
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v20/n507/pdf/020275a0.pdf
nature Volume 20 Number 507 pp261-284
In this issue (17 July 1879)
    * Book Reviews
    * Letters to Editor
    * News
    * Correction
    * News
Correction Notes-  p275 doi:10.1038/020275a0 PDF


http://forum.citizendium.org/index.php/topic,2756.msg22054.html#msg22054
http://forum.citizendium.org/index.php/topic,2756.msg22054.html#msg22054
Line 9: Line 23:




%% 18jul09 : Kaplan, The Nothing that is
== [[Zero (mathematics)/Bibliography]] ==


There are several popular books on (the history of) ''"zero"''  
There are several popular books on (the history of) ''"zero"''  
Line 17: Line 31:
: Critically reviewed by:
: Critically reviewed by:
: Philip J. Davis, ''Embedding Zero in Exposition'', Book Review. SIAM News (September 17, 2000) [[http://www.siam.org/news/news.php?id=670 siam.org]]
: Philip J. Davis, ''Embedding Zero in Exposition'', Book Review. SIAM News (September 17, 2000) [[http://www.siam.org/news/news.php?id=670 siam.org]]
: Ivor Grattan-Guinness, ''Much ado about some thing'', Book Review. Nature 401, 645-646 (14 October 1999) doi:10.1038/44273 [[http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v401/n6754/full/401645a0.html nature.com]]
: Ivor Grattan-Guinness, ''Much ado about some thing'', Book Review. Nature 401, 645-646 (14 October 1999) (doi:10.1038/44273) [[http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v401/n6754/full/401645a0.html nature.com]]
<!-- <br>
<!-- <br>
This popular book deals with a fascinating aspect of mathematics:
This popular book deals with a fascinating aspect of mathematics:
Line 35: Line 49:
: Critically reviewed by:
: Critically reviewed by:
: Brian Blank, ''Book review''. The College Mathematics Journal, Vol.32 No.2, March 2001, 155-160. See pp. 157-158 [[http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~bblank/CollegeMathJournalMarch2001review.pdf pdf]]
: Brian Blank, ''Book review''. The College Mathematics Journal, Vol.32 No.2, March 2001, 155-160. See pp. 157-158 [[http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~bblank/CollegeMathJournalMarch2001review.pdf pdf]]
: Steven G. Krantz, ''What's So Special About Zero?'' Book Review, SIAM News (September 17, 2000). [[http://www.siam.org/news/news.php?id=669 siam.org]] ([[http://www.siam.org/pdf/news/669.pdf pdf]])
: Steven G. Krantz, ''What's So Special About Zero?'' Book Review, SIAM News (September 17, 2000). [[http://www.siam.org/news/news.php?id=669 siam.org] ([http://www.siam.org/pdf/news/669.pdf pdf])]
: Keith Devlin, Natural History, Dec, 1999. [[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1134/is_10_108/ai_58360827/ bnet]]


* John D. Barrow, ''The Book of Nothing''. Pantheon: 2001. <!-- 370 pp. $27.50 -->
* John D. Barrow, ''The Book of Nothing''. Pantheon: 2001. <!-- 370 pp. $27.50 -->
Line 49: Line 64:
-->
-->


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Martin Gardner, ''The Significance of ‘Nothing’'', in: ''The Night is Large''. (1996).


What is the origin of zero? How did we indicate nothingness before zero?
What is the origin of zero? How did we indicate nothingness before zero?
<br> &nbsp; Scientific American (January 16, 2007), answer based on Kaplan ([[http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=what-is-the-origin-of-zer Scientific American]]
<br> &nbsp; Scientific American (January 16, 2007), answer based on Kaplan's book (see below). [[http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=what-is-the-origin-of-zer Scientific American]]


Bill Casselman, ''All for Nought''.
Bill Casselman, ''All for Nought''.
Line 62: Line 78:
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada -->
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada -->
Feature column at [[http://www.ams.org/featurecolumn/archive/india-zero.html ams.org]]
Feature column at [[http://www.ams.org/featurecolumn/archive/india-zero.html ams.org]]
Gwalior in India The temple is dated to 876 A. D
What the Gwalior tablet shows is that by 876 A. D. our current place-value system with a base of 10 had become part of popular culture in at least one region of India.


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
</noinclude>
</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 03:32, 22 November 2023


The account of this former contributor was not re-activated after the server upgrade of March 2022.


[[User:Peter Schmitt/{{{1}}}|{{{2}}}]]

http://rsnr.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/59/3/285.full Cayley

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v20/n507/pdf/020275a0.pdf nature Volume 20 Number 507 pp261-284 In this issue (17 July 1879) 

   * Book Reviews
   * Letters to Editor
   * News
   * Correction
   * News

Correction Notes- p275 doi:10.1038/020275a0 PDF


http://forum.citizendium.org/index.php/topic,2756.msg22054.html#msg22054 http://forum.citizendium.org/index.php/topic,2748.0.html http://forum.citizendium.org/index.php/topic,2764.msg22183.html#msg22183

http://forum.citizendium.org/index.php/topic,1085.msg8866.html#msg8866


Zero (mathematics)/Bibliography

There are several popular books on (the history of) "zero" which make interesting reading but have to be taken with care as can be seen from the reviews.

  • Robert Kaplan, The Nothing That Is: A Natural History of Zero.   Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000.
Critically reviewed by:
Philip J. Davis, Embedding Zero in Exposition, Book Review. SIAM News (September 17, 2000) [siam.org]
Ivor Grattan-Guinness, Much ado about some thing, Book Review. Nature 401, 645-646 (14 October 1999) (doi:10.1038/44273) [nature.com]
Andrew Leahy, The Mathematical Association of America. [maa.org]
Brian Blank, Book review. The College Mathematics Journal, Vol.32 No.2, March 2001, 155-160. See pp. 158-160 [pdf]
Keith Devlin, Natural History, Dec, 1999. [bnet]
John Derbyshire, The conquering zero. October 1999. [newcriterion.com]
Richard Pinch, Much ado about Nothing. Magazine issue 2228 (04 March 2000) [newscientist.com]
J. Kingston Pierce, All for Naught. [January Magazine]
  • Charles Seife, Zero: The Biography of a Dangerous Idea. Viking Penguin, New York, 2000.
Critically reviewed by:
Brian Blank, Book review. The College Mathematics Journal, Vol.32 No.2, March 2001, 155-160. See pp. 157-158 [pdf]
Steven G. Krantz, What's So Special About Zero? Book Review, SIAM News (September 17, 2000). [siam.org (pdf)]
Keith Devlin, Natural History, Dec, 1999. [bnet]
  • John D. Barrow, The Book of Nothing. Pantheon: 2001.
Critically reviewed by:
John O'Connor, Nothing to it! Book review. Nature 410, 748-749 (12 April 2001) (doi:10.1038/35071152) [nature.com]

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Martin Gardner, The Significance of ‘Nothing’, in: The Night is Large. (1996).

What is the origin of zero? How did we indicate nothingness before zero?
  Scientific American (January 16, 2007), answer based on Kaplan's book (see below). [Scientific American]

Bill Casselman, All for Nought. Feature column at [ams.org]

Gwalior in India The temple is dated to 876 A. D What the Gwalior tablet shows is that by 876 A. D. our current place-value system with a base of 10 had become part of popular culture in at least one region of India.

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=User:Peter_Schmitt/Draft&oldid=908996"