Talk:Globalization: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:


I am wedded to little in this, certainly including the workgroups. Globalization, regional alliances, and cultural exchange, however, need to be covered somewhere. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 17:19, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
I am wedded to little in this, certainly including the workgroups. Globalization, regional alliances, and cultural exchange, however, need to be covered somewhere. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 17:19, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
== Enablers? ==
{{freshstart}}
Thank you. I'd prefer this to stay on the article. If a word is in question, an alternative can be suggested, not a lecture on how my choice is wrong.
There is an enormous amount of substance that can be contributed here, and I'd hoped to get that sort of collaboration. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 19:33, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 13:33, 29 June 2009

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition The interaction of peoples, cultures, and businesses worldwide, which tend to overcome traditional national and cultural boundaries [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Politics, Economics and Sociology [Please add or review categories]
 Subgroup category:  International relations
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

Unquestionably an article to start controversy

I am wedded to little in this, certainly including the workgroups. Globalization, regional alliances, and cultural exchange, however, need to be covered somewhere. Howard C. Berkowitz 17:19, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Enablers?

The Constabulary has removed a conversation here that either in whole or in part did not meet Citizendium's Professionalism policy. Feel free to remove this template and take up the conversation with a fresh start.

Thank you. I'd prefer this to stay on the article. If a word is in question, an alternative can be suggested, not a lecture on how my choice is wrong.

There is an enormous amount of substance that can be contributed here, and I'd hoped to get that sort of collaboration. Howard C. Berkowitz 19:33, 29 June 2009 (UTC)