Neighbour-sensing model: Difference between revisions
imported>Meg Taylor (rm redundant categories) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
[[Image:Neighbour Sensing model cone.jpg|thumb|250px|Development of the cone like structure (view above, slice below)]] | [[Image:Neighbour Sensing model cone.jpg|thumb|250px|Development of the cone like structure (view above, slice below)]] | ||
'''Neighbour-Sensing model''' - the proposed hypothesis of the [[ | '''Neighbour-Sensing model''' - the proposed hypothesis of the [[fungus|fungal]] [[morphogenesis]]. The hypothesis suggests that each [[hypha]] in the fungal [[mycelium]] generates certain abstract [[Field (physics)|field]] that (like the known physical fields) decreases when increasing the distance. The proposed [[mathematical model|mathematical models]] deal with both [[scalar field|scalar]] and [[vector field|vector]] fields. The [[Field (physics)|field]] and its [[gradient]] are sensed by the hyphal tips that choose the growth direction following some supposed [[algorithm]]. The model was Audrius Meškauskas and David Moore in 2004 and proven using the [[supercomputing]] facilities of the [[Manchester]] university. | ||
The key idea of this hypothesis is that all parts in the fungal mycelium have the '''identical''' [[Vector field|field]] generation systems, field sensing mechanisms and growth direction altering algorithm. Under properly chosen model parameters it is possible to observe the transformation of the initial chaotic structure into various forms, some of them similar to the fungal fruit bodies and other complex structures. | The key idea of this hypothesis is that all parts in the fungal mycelium have the '''identical''' [[Vector field|field]] generation systems, field sensing mechanisms and growth direction altering algorithm. Under properly chosen model parameters it is possible to observe the transformation of the initial chaotic structure into various forms, some of them similar to the fungal fruit bodies and other complex structures. | ||
In one of the | In one of the simplest examples, it is supposed that the hyphal tips try to keep the 45 degree orientation with relate of the vector Earth [[gravity field]] and also generate some kind of the scalar field that the growing tips try to avoid. This combination of parameters leads to development of the [[cone]]-like structures, similar to the fruit bodies of some primitive fungi. | ||
[[Image:Neighbour Sensing model cords.jpg|thumb|250px|left|After changing the parameter set, the initially chaotic formation (in the center) starts forming cords]] | [[Image:Neighbour Sensing model cords.jpg|thumb|250px|left|After changing the parameter set, the initially chaotic formation (in the center) starts forming cords]] | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
In more complicated example, the [[hypha]] generate the vector field, parallel to the hyphal axis, and the tips have tendention to turn parallel to that field. After more tips turn in the same direction, they hypha form a stronger directional field. In this way, it is possible to observe spontaneous orientation of the growing hypha into single direction. If we additionally suppose that the tips try to keep some optimal ''absolute'' value of that vector field, it is possible to observe the [[Wire rope|cord]] formation, known in some fungal species. | In more complicated example, the [[hypha]] generate the vector field, parallel to the hyphal axis, and the tips have tendention to turn parallel to that field. After more tips turn in the same direction, they hypha form a stronger directional field. In this way, it is possible to observe spontaneous orientation of the growing hypha into single direction. If we additionally suppose that the tips try to keep some optimal ''absolute'' value of that vector field, it is possible to observe the [[Wire rope|cord]] formation, known in some fungal species. | ||
Even more | Even more various structures (including [[mushroom]] - like shapes) are obtained supposing that the growth direction strategy depends on the internal [[biological clock]]. | ||
The Neighbour-Sensing model explains how various fungal structures may arise without supposing any kind of the growth regulating hormones. These hormones, playing important role in plant and animal development, cannot be found in fungi. | The Neighbour-Sensing model explains how various fungal structures may arise without supposing any kind of the growth regulating hormones. These hormones, playing important role in plant and animal development, cannot be found in fungi. | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
* Money NP. (2004) Theoretical biology: mushrooms in cyberspace. ''Nature'', '''431'''(7004):32. | * Money NP. (2004) Theoretical biology: mushrooms in cyberspace. ''Nature'', '''431'''(7004):32. | ||
* [http://www.world-of-fungi.org/Models/mycelia_3D/index.html Project website] | * [http://www.world-of-fungi.org/Models/mycelia_3D/index.html Project website] | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}}[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]] | |||
Latest revision as of 17:00, 24 September 2024
Neighbour-Sensing model - the proposed hypothesis of the fungal morphogenesis. The hypothesis suggests that each hypha in the fungal mycelium generates certain abstract field that (like the known physical fields) decreases when increasing the distance. The proposed mathematical models deal with both scalar and vector fields. The field and its gradient are sensed by the hyphal tips that choose the growth direction following some supposed algorithm. The model was Audrius Meškauskas and David Moore in 2004 and proven using the supercomputing facilities of the Manchester university.
The key idea of this hypothesis is that all parts in the fungal mycelium have the identical field generation systems, field sensing mechanisms and growth direction altering algorithm. Under properly chosen model parameters it is possible to observe the transformation of the initial chaotic structure into various forms, some of them similar to the fungal fruit bodies and other complex structures.
In one of the simplest examples, it is supposed that the hyphal tips try to keep the 45 degree orientation with relate of the vector Earth gravity field and also generate some kind of the scalar field that the growing tips try to avoid. This combination of parameters leads to development of the cone-like structures, similar to the fruit bodies of some primitive fungi.
In more complicated example, the hypha generate the vector field, parallel to the hyphal axis, and the tips have tendention to turn parallel to that field. After more tips turn in the same direction, they hypha form a stronger directional field. In this way, it is possible to observe spontaneous orientation of the growing hypha into single direction. If we additionally suppose that the tips try to keep some optimal absolute value of that vector field, it is possible to observe the cord formation, known in some fungal species.
Even more various structures (including mushroom - like shapes) are obtained supposing that the growth direction strategy depends on the internal biological clock.
The Neighbour-Sensing model explains how various fungal structures may arise without supposing any kind of the growth regulating hormones. These hormones, playing important role in plant and animal development, cannot be found in fungi.
Literature
- Meškauskas A, Fricker M.D, Moore D (2004). Simulating colonial growth of fungi with the Neighbour-Sensing model of hyphal growth. Mycological research, 108, 1241-1256.
- Meškauskas, A., McNulty, Moore, D. (2004). Concerted regulation of tropisms in all hyphal tips is sufficient to generate most fungal structures. Mycological research, 108, 341-353.
- Money NP. (2004) Theoretical biology: mushrooms in cyberspace. Nature, 431(7004):32.
- Project website