Forti v. Suarez Mason/Definition: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
(New page: <noinclude>{{Subpages}}</noinclude> A 1987 U.S. case that determined that the principle of ''hostis humani generis'' applied to torturers, and thus placed them under [[universal jurisd...)
 
m (Text replacement - "universal jurisdiction" to "universal jurisdiction")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
<noinclude>{{Subpages}}</noinclude>
<noinclude>{{Subpages}}</noinclude>
A 1987 U.S. case that determined that the principle of ''[[hostis humani generis]]'' applied to torturers, and thus placed them under [[universal jurisdiction]], such that they could be appreheded by any country even though the torture had taken place in that country, and the parties were not citizens of that country
A 1987 U.S. case that determined that the principle of ''[[hostis humani generis]]'' applied to torturers, and thus placed them under universal jurisdiction, such that they could be appreheded by any country even though the torture had taken place in that country, and the parties were not citizens of that country

Latest revision as of 11:51, 29 May 2024

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
A definition or brief description of Forti v. Suarez Mason.

A 1987 U.S. case that determined that the principle of hostis humani generis applied to torturers, and thus placed them under universal jurisdiction, such that they could be appreheded by any country even though the torture had taken place in that country, and the parties were not citizens of that country