Talk:Applied Ethics: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Martin Cohen
(source note)
 
imported>Peter Jackson
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
Some of this content is from Wikipedia. I was the contributor there for that content originally. It in turn draws on Almond's entry for the Penguin Dictionary of Philosophy, and I have permission for extensive use of the text.[[User:Martin Cohen|Martin Cohen]] 12:29, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Some of this content is from Wikipedia. I was the contributor there for that content originally. It in turn draws on Almond's entry for the Penguin Dictionary of Philosophy, and I have permission for extensive use of the text.[[User:Martin Cohen|Martin Cohen]] 12:29, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi Martin, if this article begins to change considerably and is unrecognizable as a wikipedia article, you can remove the content from wikipedia' checkbox (found next to the SAVE button when you edit the article).  Would you be an editor on this article?! Put the subpages template on it and put your workgroup in and bingo, you're in. [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 01:31, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Is it possible to say anything sensible and useful about ethical investment? --[[User:Martin Wyatt|Martin Wyatt]] ([[User talk:Martin Wyatt|talk]]) 20:32, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
:There seem to be two questions:
:#What is it ethical for a business to do?
:#How relevant is that to decisions on whether to invest in a business doing thing sone might consider unethical, or in a business investing in such a business, or ...
:On a separate issue. The use of the term "casuistry" here is confusing and/or misleading. This may or may not be how modern philosophers use the term, but it's not how it's used in traditional Catholic moral theology, or in popular usage. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] ([[User talk:Peter Jackson|talk]]) 15:13, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 09:13, 18 January 2016

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition The philosophical examination, from a moral standpoint, of particular issues in private and public life that are matters of moral judgment. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Philosophy [Please add or review categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

Some of this content is from Wikipedia. I was the contributor there for that content originally. It in turn draws on Almond's entry for the Penguin Dictionary of Philosophy, and I have permission for extensive use of the text.Martin Cohen 12:29, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Hi Martin, if this article begins to change considerably and is unrecognizable as a wikipedia article, you can remove the content from wikipedia' checkbox (found next to the SAVE button when you edit the article). Would you be an editor on this article?! Put the subpages template on it and put your workgroup in and bingo, you're in. D. Matt Innis 01:31, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Is it possible to say anything sensible and useful about ethical investment? --Martin Wyatt (talk) 20:32, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

There seem to be two questions:
  1. What is it ethical for a business to do?
  2. How relevant is that to decisions on whether to invest in a business doing thing sone might consider unethical, or in a business investing in such a business, or ...
On a separate issue. The use of the term "casuistry" here is confusing and/or misleading. This may or may not be how modern philosophers use the term, but it's not how it's used in traditional Catholic moral theology, or in popular usage. Peter Jackson (talk) 15:13, 18 January 2016 (UTC)