Disjoint union: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Richard Pinch
m (link)
mNo edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
In [[mathematics]], the '''disjoint union''' of two [[set (mathematics)|set]]s ''X'' and ''Y'' is a set which contains "copies" of each of ''X'' and ''Y'': it is denoted <math>X \amalg Y</math> or, less often, <math>X \uplus Y</math>.
In [[mathematics]], the '''disjoint union''' of two [[set (mathematics)|set]]s ''X'' and ''Y'' is a set which contains "copies" of each of ''X'' and ''Y'': it is denoted <math>X \amalg Y</math> or, less often, <math>X \uplus Y</math>.


Line 9: Line 10:
The disjoint union has a [[universal property]]: if there is a set ''Z'' with maps <math>f:X \rightarrow Z</math> and <math>g:Y \rightarrow Z</math>, then there is a map <math>h : X \amalg Y \rightarrow Z</math> such that the compositions <math>\mathrm{in}_1 \cdot h = f</math> and <math>\mathrm{in}_2 \cdot h = g</math>.
The disjoint union has a [[universal property]]: if there is a set ''Z'' with maps <math>f:X \rightarrow Z</math> and <math>g:Y \rightarrow Z</math>, then there is a map <math>h : X \amalg Y \rightarrow Z</math> such that the compositions <math>\mathrm{in}_1 \cdot h = f</math> and <math>\mathrm{in}_2 \cdot h = g</math>.


The disjoint union is [[commutative]], in the sense that there is a natural bijection between <math>X \amalg Y</math> and <math>Y \amalg X</math>; it is [[associative]] again in the sense that there is a natural bijection between <math>X \amalg (Y \amalg Z)</math> and <math>(X \amalg Y) \amalg Z</math>.
The disjoint union is [[commutative]], in the sense that there is a natural [[bijection]] between <math>X \amalg Y</math> and <math>Y \amalg X</math>; it is [[associative]] again in the sense that there is a natural bijection between <math>X \amalg (Y \amalg Z)</math> and <math>(X \amalg Y) \amalg Z</math>.


==General unions==
==General unions==
Line 21: Line 22:


==References==
==References==
* {{cite book | author=Paul Halmos | authorlink=Paul Halmos | title=Naive set theory | series=The University Series in Undergraduate Mathematics | publisher=[[Van Nostrand Reinhold]] | year=1960 | pages=24 }}
* {{cite book | author=Michael D. Potter | title=Sets: An Introduction | publisher=[[Oxford University Press]] | year=1990 | isbn=0-19-853399-3 | pages=36-37 }}[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]]
* {{cite book | author=Keith J. Devlin | authorlink=Keith Devlin | title=Fundamentals of Contemporary Set Theory | series=Universitext | publisher=[[Springer-Verlag]] | year=1979 | isbn=0-387-90441-7 | pages=12 }}

Latest revision as of 16:00, 7 August 2024

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

In mathematics, the disjoint union of two sets X and Y is a set which contains "copies" of each of X and Y: it is denoted or, less often, .

There are injection maps in1 and in2 from X and Y to the disjoint union, which are injective functions with disjoint images.

If X and Y are disjoint, then the usual union is also a disjoint union. In general, the disjoint union can be realised in a number of ways, for example as

The disjoint union has a universal property: if there is a set Z with maps and , then there is a map such that the compositions and .

The disjoint union is commutative, in the sense that there is a natural bijection between and ; it is associative again in the sense that there is a natural bijection between and .

General unions

The disjoint union of any finite number of sets may be defined inductively, as

The disjoint union of a general family of sets Xλ as λ ranges over a general index set Λ may be defined as

References