Talk:Alcmaeon of Croton/Draft: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Anthony.Sebastian
imported>John Stephenson
m (moved Talk:Alcmaeon of Croton to Talk:Alcmaeon of Croton/Draft over redirect: Cannot get the banner info on approved-article Talk pages to show with Citable Versions subpages, so moving this whence it came for now)
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 12: Line 12:
:Yes. I'll make the change.  Thanks.  [[User:Anthony.Sebastian|Anthony.Sebastian]] 01:04, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
:Yes. I'll make the change.  Thanks.  [[User:Anthony.Sebastian|Anthony.Sebastian]] 01:04, 25 May 2011 (UTC)


==Ready for Approval?==


<br>
I've received notices that this article might be close to approval.  I've added the version and a date one week from today, but I'll need each editor to put their own names in the [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Template:Alcmaeon/Metadata&action=edit ToApprove sections of the metadata] to be sure you approve of those versions.  You can change to any version, but I will be looking to make sure that each of you have seen, and endorsed, the nominated version before I can lock the page.  [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 13:02, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
<hr><br>
 
:I see that Health Sciences editor Robert Badgett has endorsed this article.  After careful evaluation, I have determined that, though [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Alcmaeon&action=historysubmit&diff=100773355&oldid=100773340 this edit] looks like a significant content edit, it is essentially a combination of copy edits.  Therefore, I can accept his nomination as a single editor approval.  Since the date has passed, I will lock the version he has endorsed.  Anyone can sign on to endorse this version as well, or nominate a newer and improved version. [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 01:41, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 
==APPROVED Version 1.0==
 
<div class="usermessage plainlinks">Discussion for [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Alcmaeon&oldid=100774716 Version 1.0] stopped here. Please continue further discussion under this break. </div>
 
== Thanks Matt ==
 
Thanks, Matt.  [[User:Anthony.Sebastian|Anthony.Sebastian]] 06:16, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 14:19, 2 October 2013

This article has a Citable Version.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition A Greek natural philosopher, living c. 500 BCE, interested in particular in medicine and physiology, credited by scholars as the first person to recognize the brain as the seat of intelligence and mind, whose ideas about the causes of disease prompted or anticipated those of Hippocrates. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Health Sciences, Biology and History [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

Article start

Starting article on the ancient Greek natural philosopher, Alcmaeon. --Anthony.Sebastian 23:14, 3 September 2008 (CDT)

Love it.Gareth Leng 16:12, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
Thanks. It still needs work, though. Anthony.Sebastian 22:59, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Great article; small question

Should "Ancient Greece" be a parent topic rather than a subtopic? - Robert Badgett 00:59, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Yes. I'll make the change. Thanks. Anthony.Sebastian 01:04, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Ready for Approval?

I've received notices that this article might be close to approval. I've added the version and a date one week from today, but I'll need each editor to put their own names in the ToApprove sections of the metadata to be sure you approve of those versions. You can change to any version, but I will be looking to make sure that each of you have seen, and endorsed, the nominated version before I can lock the page. D. Matt Innis 13:02, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

I see that Health Sciences editor Robert Badgett has endorsed this article. After careful evaluation, I have determined that, though this edit looks like a significant content edit, it is essentially a combination of copy edits. Therefore, I can accept his nomination as a single editor approval. Since the date has passed, I will lock the version he has endorsed. Anyone can sign on to endorse this version as well, or nominate a newer and improved version. D. Matt Innis 01:41, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

APPROVED Version 1.0

Thanks Matt

Thanks, Matt. Anthony.Sebastian 06:16, 7 June 2011 (UTC)