Antibiotic resistance: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
mNo edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
When the early [[antibiotic|antibiotics]] such as [[penicillin]] and [[streptomycin]] went into use, individual general and species of [[bacteria]] tended either to be susceptible to them. As antibiotics have been widely used, broadening the definition to include [[antiprotozoal]], [[antifungal]] and [[antiviral]] drugs, organisms once exquisitely sensitive to specific drugs are no longer effective. In some cases, there may be partial resistance, so extremely high dosage levels, usually [[parenteral]], may work, but in such cases, it is probably a matter of time until fully resistant forms emerge.
{{TOC|right}}
When the early [[antibiotic|antibiotics]] such as [[penicillin]] and [[streptomycin]] went into use, individual general and species of [[bacteria]] tended either to be susceptible to them, or the drug had no effect. As antibiotics have been widely used, broadening the definition to include [[antiprotozoal]], [[antifungal]] and [[antiviral]] drugs, organisms once exquisitely sensitive to specific drugs are no longer effective. In some cases, there may be partial resistance, so extremely high dosage levels, usually [[parenteral]], may work, but in such cases, it is probably a matter of time until fully resistant forms emerge.


Given that resistant strains are developing faster than new antibiotics, resistance is a worldwide threat, according to [[U.S. intelligence analysis of patterns of infectious diseases and impacts]]. The first antibiotics became available a little more than a half-century ago, and antivirals are quite recent — yet a challenge of [[HIV]] therapy is the constant appearance of resistant viral strains. Multidrug resistant tuberculosis is a worldwide problem, given that any treatment of this disease is prolonged.
Given that resistant strains are developing faster than new antibiotics, resistance is a worldwide threat, according to [[U.S. intelligence analysis of patterns of infectious diseases and impacts]]. The first antibiotics became available a little more than a half-century ago, and antivirals are quite recent — yet a challenge of [[HIV]] therapy is the constant appearance of resistant viral strains. Multidrug resistant tuberculosis is a worldwide problem, given that any treatment of this disease is prolonged.
Line 23: Line 24:


Other mechanisms, not yet fully understood in the ecology, include the [[horizontal gene transfer|transfer of resistance genes]] among totally different species.
Other mechanisms, not yet fully understood in the ecology, include the [[horizontal gene transfer|transfer of resistance genes]] among totally different species.
==Mechanisms of resistance==


==Human activities promoting antibiotic resistance==
==Human activities promoting antibiotic resistance==


A number of organisms have developed resistance to antibiotics resistant to them.  
A number of organisms have developed resistance to antibiotics resistant to them.  
Assorted human actions cause much of the development of resistance, with reasons ranging to overprescribing antibiotics in situations where they are unlikely to help<ref name="pmid18665065">{{cite journal |author=Ranji SR, Steinman MA, Shojania KG, Gonzales R |title=Interventions to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing: a systematic review and quantitative analysis |journal=Med Care |volume=46 |issue=8 |pages=847–62 |year=2008 |month=August |pmid=18665065 |doi=10.1097/MLR.0b013e318178eabd |url=http://meta.wkhealth.com/pt/pt-core/template-journal/lwwgateway/media/landingpage.htm?an=00005650-200808000-00012 |issn=}}</ref>, to patients stopping therapy when they feel better but still have an active bacterial infection, to the use of antibiotics as agricultural growth stimulants.
Assorted human actions cause much of the development of resistance, with reasons ranging to overprescribing antibiotics to patients stopping therapy prematurely, to the use of antibiotics as agricultural growth stimulants.
 
Factors affecting physician behavior:
* "Physicians were more likely to prescribe antibiotics to patients who  they believed expected them, although they (the physicians) correctly  identified only about 1 in 4 of those patients".<ref name="pmid17467120">{{cite journal |author=Ong S, Nakase J, Moran GJ, Karras DJ, Kuehnert MJ, Talan DA |title=Antibiotic  use for emergency department patients with upper respiratory  infections: prescribing practices, patient expectations, and patient  satisfaction |journal=Annals of emergency medicine |volume=50  |issue=|pages=213-20  |year=2007  |pmid=17467120  |doi=10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.03.026}}</ref>
* Physicians may be more likely to prescribe antibiotics when the physicians are tired during clinical care.<ref name="pmid25286067">{{cite journal| author=Linder JA, Doctor JN, Friedberg MW, Reyes Nieva H, Birks C, Meeker D et al.| title=Time of Day and the Decision to Prescribe Antibiotics. | journal=JAMA Intern Med | year= 2014 | volume=  | issue=  | pages= | pmid=25286067 | doi=10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5225 | pmc= | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=25286067  }} </ref>
* The use of antibiotics  varies among countries.<ref name="pmid19549995">{{cite journal |author=Butler CC, Hood K,  Verheij T, ''et  al.'' |title=Variation in  antibiotic prescribing and its impact on recovery in patients with acute  cough in primary care: prospective study in 13 countries |journal=BMJ  |volume=338 |issue= |pages=b2242 |year=2009 |pmid=19549995 |doi= |url=http://bmj.com/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=19549995  |issn=}}</ref>  


==Slowing the development of resistance==
==Slowing the development of resistance==
Interventions to reduce overprescribing have been systematically  reviewed.<ref  name="pmid18665065">{{cite  journal |author=Ranji SR, Steinman MA, Shojania KG, Gonzales R  |title=Interventions to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing: a  systematic review and quantitative analysis |journal=Med Care |volume=46  |issue=8 |pages=847–62 |year=2008 |month=August |pmid=18665065  |doi=10.1097/MLR.0b013e318178eabd |url=http://meta.wkhealth.com/pt/pt-core/template-journal/lwwgateway/media/landingpage.htm?an=00005650-200808000-00012 |issn=}}</ref> One study on [[respiratory  tract infection]]s found  "physicians were more likely to prescribe antibiotics to patients who  they believed expected them, although they (the physicians) correctly  identified only about 1 in 4 of those patients".<ref name="pmid17467120">{{cite journal |author=Ong S,  Nakase J, Moran GJ, Karras DJ, Kuehnert MJ, Talan DA |title=Antibiotic  use for emergency department patients with upper respiratory  infections: prescribing practices, patient expectations, and patient  satisfaction |journal=Annals of emergency medicine |volume=50  |issue=3  |pages=213-20  |year=2007  |pmid=17467120  |doi=10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.03.026}}</ref> The use of antibiotics  varies among countries.<ref name="pmid19549995">{{cite journal |author=Butler CC, Hood K,  Verheij T, ''et  al.'' |title=Variation in  antibiotic prescribing and its impact on recovery in patients with acute  cough in primary care: prospective study in 13 countries |journal=BMJ  |volume=338 |issue= |pages=b2242 |year=2009 |pmid=19549995 |doi= |url=http://bmj.com/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=19549995 |issn=}}</ref> Multifactorial interventions aimed at both physicians and patients can reduce  inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics. <ref name="pmid17509729">{{cite journal |author=Metlay  JP, Camargo CA, MacKenzie T, ''et al''  |title=Cluster-randomized  trial to improve antibiotic use for adults with acute respiratory  infections treated in emergency departments |journal=Annals  of emergency medicine |volume=50 |issue=3 |pages=221-30 |year=2007 |pmid=17509729 |doi=10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.03.022}}</ref> Delaying antibiotics for 48 hours while waiting on improvement of [[respiratory  tract infection]]s<ref  name="pmid17636757">{{cite journal |author=Spurling G, Del Mar C, Dooley L, Foxlee R  |title=Delayed  antibiotics for respiratory infections |journal=Cochrane  database of systematic reviews (Online) |volume=  |issue=3  |pages=CD004417  |year=2007  |pmid=17636757  |doi=10.1002/14651858.CD004417.pub3}}</ref><ref name="pmid19843421">{{cite journal| author=Moore M, Little P,  Rumsby K, Kelly J, Watson L, Warner G et al.| title=Effect of antibiotic  prescribing strategies and an information leaflet on longer-term  reconsultation for acute lower respiratory tract infection. | journal=Br  J Gen Pract | year= 2009 | volume= 59 | issue= 567 | pages= 728-34 |  pmid=19843421  
Interventions to reduce overprescribing have been systematically  reviewed.<ref  name="pmid18665065">{{cite  journal |author=Ranji SR, Steinman MA, Shojania KG, Gonzales R  |title=Interventions to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing: a  systematic review and quantitative analysis |journal=Med Care |volume=46  |issue=8 |pages=847–62 |year=2008 |month=August |pmid=18665065  |doi=10.1097/MLR.0b013e318178eabd |url=http://meta.wkhealth.com/pt/pt-core/template-journal/lwwgateway/media/landingpage.htm?an=00005650-200808000-00012  |issn=}}</ref> Multifactorial interventions aimed at both physicians and patients can reduce  inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics. <ref name="pmid17509729">{{cite journal |author=Metlay  JP, Camargo CA, MacKenzie T, ''et al''  |title=Cluster-randomized  trial to improve antibiotic use for adults with acute respiratory  infections treated in emergency departments |journal=Annals  of emergency medicine |volume=50 |issue=3 |pages=221-30 |year=2007 |pmid=17509729 |doi=10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.03.022}}</ref>
| url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=clinical.uthscsa.edu/cite&email=badgett@uthscdsa.edu&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=19843421  | doi=10.3399/bjgp09X472601 | pmc=PMC2751917 }} </ref> or [[cystitis]]<ref name="pmid19364448">{{cite journal |author=Little P, Turner S,  Rumsby K, ''et  al'' |title=Dipsticks and  diagnostic algorithms in urinary tract infection: development and  validation, randomised trial, economic analysis, observational cohort  and qualitative study |journal=Health Technol Assess |volume=13  |issue=19 |pages=iii–iv, ix–xi, 1–73 |year=2009 |month=March  |pmid=19364448 |doi=10.3310/hta13190 |url=http://www.hta.ac.uk/execsumm/summ1319.htm |issn=}}</ref> may reduce antibiotic usage; however, this strategy may reduce patient  satisfaction.
 
===Delayed prescriptions===
Delaying antibiotics for 48 hours while waiting on improvement of [[respiratory  tract infection]]s<ref  name="pmid17636757">{{cite journal |author=Spurling G, Del Mar C, Dooley L, Foxlee R  |title=Delayed  antibiotics for respiratory infections |journal=Cochrane  database of systematic reviews (Online) |volume=  |issue=3  |pages=CD004417  |year=2007  |pmid=17636757  |doi=10.1002/14651858.CD004417.pub3}}</ref><ref name="pmid19843421">{{cite journal| author=Moore M, Little P,  Rumsby K, Kelly J, Watson L, Warner G et al.| title=Effect of antibiotic  prescribing strategies and an information leaflet on longer-term  reconsultation for acute lower respiratory tract infection. | journal=Br  J Gen Pract | year= 2009 | volume= 59 | issue= 567 | pages= 728-34 |  pmid=19843421  
| url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=clinical.uthscsa.edu/cite&email=badgett@uthscdsa.edu&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=19843421  | doi=10.3399/bjgp09X472601 | pmc=PMC2751917 }} </ref> or [[cystitis]]<ref name="pmid19364448">{{cite journal |author=Little P, Turner S,  Rumsby K, ''et  al'' |title=Dipsticks and  diagnostic algorithms in urinary tract infection: development and  validation, randomised trial, economic analysis, observational cohort  and qualitative study |journal=Health Technol Assess |volume=13  |issue=19 |pages=iii–iv, ix–xi, 1–73 |year=2009 |month=March  |pmid=19364448 |doi=10.3310/hta13190 |url=http://www.hta.ac.uk/execsumm/summ1319.htm |issn=}}</ref> may reduce antibiotic usage and reconsultation; however, this strategy may reduce patient  satisfaction.
 
===Biomarker-guided therapy===
[[C-reactive protein]] and [[procalcitonin]] levels may have similar utility when compared.<ref name="pmid23921272">{{cite journal| author=Oliveira CF, Botoni FA, Oliveira CR, Silva CB, Pereira HA, Serufo JC et al.| title=Procalcitonin versus C-reactive protein for guiding antibiotic therapy in sepsis: a randomized trial. | journal=Crit Care Med | year= 2013 | volume= 41 | issue= 10 | pages= 2336-43 | pmid=23921272 | doi=10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828e969f | pmc= | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=23921272  }} </ref>. Regarding individual studies:
* [[C-reactive  protein]]
** Normal [[c-reactive  protein]] levels may help [[health care provider]]s reduce antibiotic use.<ref  name="pmid19416992">{{cite  journal |author=Cals JW, Butler CC, Hopstaken RM, Hood K, Dinant  GJ |title=Effect of point of care testing for C reactive protein and  training in communication skills on antibiotic use in lower respiratory  tract infections: cluster randomised trial |journal=BMJ |volume=338  |issue= |pages=b1374 |year=2009 |pmid=19416992 |pmc=2677640 |doi= |url=http://bmj.com/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=19416992  |issn=}}</ref>
* [[Procalcitonin]]
** Normal [[procalcitonin]] levels may help [[health care  provider]]s reduce  antibiotic use.<ref  name="pmid16603606">{{cite  journal |author=Christ-Crain M, Stolz D, Bingisser R, ''et al.'' |title=Procalcitonin guidance of  antibiotic therapy in community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized trial  |journal=Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. |volume=174 |issue=1  |pages=84–93 |year=2006 |month=July |pmid=16603606  |doi=10.1164/rccm.200512-1922OC |url=http://ajrccm.atsjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=16603606  |issn=}}</ref><ref name="pmid17218551">{{cite journal |author=Stolz D, Christ-Crain  M, Bingisser R, ''et  al.'' |title=Antibiotic treatment  of exacerbations of COPD: a randomized, controlled trial comparing  procalcitonin-guidance with standard therapy |journal=Chest |volume=131  |issue=1 |pages=9–19 |year=2007 |month=January |pmid=17218551  |doi=10.1378/chest.06-1500 |url=http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=17218551  |issn=}}</ref><ref name="pmid14987884">{{cite journal |author=Christ-Crain M,  Jaccard-Stolz D, Bingisser R, ''et al.''  |title=Effect of procalcitonin-guided treatment on antibiotic use and  outcome in lower respiratory tract infections: cluster-randomised,  single-blinded intervention trial |journal=Lancet |volume=363  |issue=9409 |pages=600–7 |year=2004 |month=February |pmid=14987884  |doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15591-8 |url=http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140-6736(04)15591-8  |issn=}}</ref><ref name="pmid18852401">{{cite journal |author=Briel M, Schuetz P,  Mueller B, ''et  al'' |title=Procalcitonin-guided  antibiotic use vs a standard approach for acute respiratory tract  infections in primary care |journal=Archives of internal medicine  |volume=168 |issue=18 |pages=2000–7; discussion 2007–8 |year=2008  |month=October |pmid=18852401 |doi=10.1001/archinte.168.18.2000 |url=http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=18852401  |issn=}}</ref>


Normal [[c-reactive  protein]] levels have  been used to help [[health care provider]]s reduce antibiotic use.<ref  name="pmid19416992">{{cite  journal |author=Cals JW, Butler CC, Hopstaken RM, Hood K, Dinant GJ |title=Effect of point of care testing for C reactive protein and  training in communication skills on antibiotic use in lower respiratory  tract infections: cluster randomised trial |journal=BMJ |volume=338 |issue= |pages=b1374 |year=2009 |pmid=19416992 |pmc=2677640 |doi= |url=http://bmj.com/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=19416992 |issn=}}</ref>
===Antibiotic stewardship===
At the Centers for Disease Control, a program called Get Smart for Healthcare has been instituted under Arjun Srinivasan, Associate Director of Healthcare-associated Infection Prevention ProgramsOne of its tenets is a three-step concept of responsible antibiotic use, called '''antibiotic stewardship''':<ref>{{citation
  | url = http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/731784?src=mp&spon=18&uac=54797FZ
  | title = Three Steps to Antibiotic Stewardship
| author = Arjun Srinivasan
| date = 15 November 2010
| publisher = [{Centers for Disease Control]]}}</ref>


Normal [[procalcitonin]]  levels have been used to help [[health care  provider]]s reduce  antibiotic use.<ref  name="pmid16603606">{{cite  journal |author=Christ-Crain M, Stolz D, Bingisser R, ''et al.'' |title=Procalcitonin guidance of  antibiotic therapy in community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized trial  |journal=Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. |volume=174 |issue=1  |pages=84–93 |year=2006 |month=July |pmid=16603606  |doi=10.1164/rccm.200512-1922OC |url=http://ajrccm.atsjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=16603606  |issn=}}</ref><ref name="pmid17218551">{{cite journal |author=Stolz D, Christ-Crain  M, Bingisser R, ''et  al.'' |title=Antibiotic treatment  of exacerbations of COPD: a randomized, controlled trial comparing  procalcitonin-guidance with standard therapy |journal=Chest |volume=131  |issue=1 |pages=9–19 |year=2007 |month=January |pmid=17218551  |doi=10.1378/chest.06-1500 |url=http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=17218551  |issn=}}</ref><ref name="pmid14987884">{{cite journal |author=Christ-Crain M,  Jaccard-Stolz D, Bingisser R, ''et al.''  |title=Effect of procalcitonin-guided treatment on antibiotic use and  outcome in lower respiratory tract infections: cluster-randomised,  single-blinded intervention trial |journal=Lancet |volume=363  |issue=9409 |pages=600–7 |year=2004 |month=February |pmid=14987884  |doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15591-8 |url=http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140-6736(04)15591-8  |issn=}}</ref><ref name="pmid18852401">{{cite journal |author=Briel M, Schuetz P,  Mueller B, ''et  al'' |title=Procalcitonin-guided  antibiotic use vs a standard approach for acute respiratory tract  infections in primary care |journal=Archives of internal medicine  |volume=168 |issue=18 |pages=2000–7; discussion 2007–8 |year=2008  |month=October |pmid=18852401 |doi=10.1001/archinte.168.18.2000 |url=http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=18852401  |issn=}}</ref>
#"All antibiotic orders should have 3 pieces of information -- a dose, duration, and indication...it is certainly harder to stop therapy if you don't know why it was started in the first place. This challenge is compounded in today's healthcare system where the primary responsibility for patient care is frequently transitioned from one clinician to another.
#"When placing orders, make certain that they include getting microbiology cultures. Knowing the susceptibility of the infecting organism can allow you to narrow a broad spectrum therapy, change the therapy to better treat resistant pathogens, or stop antibiotics when the cultures results suggest an infection is unlikely."
#"When your culture results come back in 24-48 hours, let's take an antibiotic time-out. Stop and reassess therapy. Antibiotics are generally started before a patient's full clinical picture is known. Now that you have additional information including microbiology, radiographic and clinical information, ask yourself -- Is this antibiotic still warranted? Or more importantly, is this antibiotic still effective against this organism?"


==Treating resistant forms==
==Treating resistant forms==
Line 46: Line 68:
Among the first responses were the synthesis of penicillins, such as [[methicillin]], which protected this bond. In time, however, methicillin did not work on some bacteria, beginning with ''[[Staphylococcus aureus]]''. Since ''S. aureus'' is an important [[pathogen]], common in wound infection but also appearing in systemic disease, [[methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus]] ('''MRSA'') became a matter of close surveillance by infectious disease specialists.
Among the first responses were the synthesis of penicillins, such as [[methicillin]], which protected this bond. In time, however, methicillin did not work on some bacteria, beginning with ''[[Staphylococcus aureus]]''. Since ''S. aureus'' is an important [[pathogen]], common in wound infection but also appearing in systemic disease, [[methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus]] ('''MRSA'') became a matter of close surveillance by infectious disease specialists.


Another approach was to co-administer a penicillin with a [[penicillinase inhibitor]], such as [[clavulanic acide]].
Another approach was to co-administer a penicillin with a [[penicillinase inhibitor]], such as [[clavulanic acid]].


In serious infections with MRSA, the "last resort" tended to be [[vancomycin]]. Since vancomycin, for systemic infections, must be administered intravenously, it was relatively easy to restrict it to controlled hospital use, only for specific strains. Eventually, vancomycin resistance was seen among staphylococci; acquired resistance was first observed in ''Enterococci''.
In serious infections with MRSA, the "last resort" tended to be [[vancomycin]]. Since vancomycin, for systemic infections, must be administered intravenously, it was relatively easy to restrict it to controlled hospital use, only for specific strains. Eventually, vancomycin resistance was seen among staphylococci; acquired resistance was first observed in ''Enterococci''.
==Bacterial resistance to the tetracyclines==
===Bacterial resistance to the tetracyclines===
[[Glycylcycline]]s were developed to "evade" resistance mechanisms of [[tetracycline]]s.
[[Glycylcycline]]s were developed to "evade" resistance mechanisms of [[tetracycline]]s.
==Multiple antibiotic therapy==
==Multiple antibiotic therapy==
Line 56: Line 78:
Several antibiotics are always given together for synergistic effect, such as [[trimethoprim-sulfisoxazole]]. In other cases, multiple antibiotics are given to ''avoid'' resistance formation in certain species, such as ''[[Mycobacteria]]''. [[Quinupristin-dalfopristin]], however, are a pair of [[streptogramin]]-class indicated for critical resistant forms, such as MRSA.
Several antibiotics are always given together for synergistic effect, such as [[trimethoprim-sulfisoxazole]]. In other cases, multiple antibiotics are given to ''avoid'' resistance formation in certain species, such as ''[[Mycobacteria]]''. [[Quinupristin-dalfopristin]], however, are a pair of [[streptogramin]]-class indicated for critical resistant forms, such as MRSA.
==References==
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]]

Latest revision as of 11:00, 11 July 2024

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

When the early antibiotics such as penicillin and streptomycin went into use, individual general and species of bacteria tended either to be susceptible to them, or the drug had no effect. As antibiotics have been widely used, broadening the definition to include antiprotozoal, antifungal and antiviral drugs, organisms once exquisitely sensitive to specific drugs are no longer effective. In some cases, there may be partial resistance, so extremely high dosage levels, usually parenteral, may work, but in such cases, it is probably a matter of time until fully resistant forms emerge.

Given that resistant strains are developing faster than new antibiotics, resistance is a worldwide threat, according to U.S. intelligence analysis of patterns of infectious diseases and impacts. The first antibiotics became available a little more than a half-century ago, and antivirals are quite recent — yet a challenge of HIV therapy is the constant appearance of resistant viral strains. Multidrug resistant tuberculosis is a worldwide problem, given that any treatment of this disease is prolonged.

Development of resistance

At the microbial level, this may be due either to the antibiotic therapy allowing the survival of naturally resistant organisms of the species, or of the transfer of resistance genetic factors among bacteria. It is not, as once thought, a matter of natural selection, where a few organisms within a species randomly mutate, become resistant, and thus become better equipped for survival.

After a patient uses an antibiotic, the risk of resistant organisms is greatest after one month, but the risk may continue for one year.[1]

Other mechanisms, not yet fully understood in the ecology, include the transfer of resistance genes among totally different species.

Human activities promoting antibiotic resistance

A number of organisms have developed resistance to antibiotics resistant to them. Assorted human actions cause much of the development of resistance, with reasons ranging to overprescribing antibiotics to patients stopping therapy prematurely, to the use of antibiotics as agricultural growth stimulants.

Factors affecting physician behavior:

  • "Physicians were more likely to prescribe antibiotics to patients who they believed expected them, although they (the physicians) correctly identified only about 1 in 4 of those patients".[2]
  • Physicians may be more likely to prescribe antibiotics when the physicians are tired during clinical care.[3]
  • The use of antibiotics varies among countries.[4]

Slowing the development of resistance

Interventions to reduce overprescribing have been systematically reviewed.[5] Multifactorial interventions aimed at both physicians and patients can reduce inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics. [6]

Delayed prescriptions

Delaying antibiotics for 48 hours while waiting on improvement of respiratory tract infections[7][8] or cystitis[9] may reduce antibiotic usage and reconsultation; however, this strategy may reduce patient satisfaction.

Biomarker-guided therapy

C-reactive protein and procalcitonin levels may have similar utility when compared.[10]. Regarding individual studies:

Antibiotic stewardship

At the Centers for Disease Control, a program called Get Smart for Healthcare has been instituted under Arjun Srinivasan, Associate Director of Healthcare-associated Infection Prevention Programs, One of its tenets is a three-step concept of responsible antibiotic use, called antibiotic stewardship:[16]

  1. "All antibiotic orders should have 3 pieces of information -- a dose, duration, and indication...it is certainly harder to stop therapy if you don't know why it was started in the first place. This challenge is compounded in today's healthcare system where the primary responsibility for patient care is frequently transitioned from one clinician to another.
  2. "When placing orders, make certain that they include getting microbiology cultures. Knowing the susceptibility of the infecting organism can allow you to narrow a broad spectrum therapy, change the therapy to better treat resistant pathogens, or stop antibiotics when the cultures results suggest an infection is unlikely."
  3. "When your culture results come back in 24-48 hours, let's take an antibiotic time-out. Stop and reassess therapy. Antibiotics are generally started before a patient's full clinical picture is known. Now that you have additional information including microbiology, radiographic and clinical information, ask yourself -- Is this antibiotic still warranted? Or more importantly, is this antibiotic still effective against this organism?"

Treating resistant forms

When a form was found resistant, especially if the mechanism of resistance was known, a variant of the same class of antibiotics might be useful.

Bacterial resistance to the penicillins

For example, the earliest example of bacterial resistance to penicillins was bacterial production of an enzyme called penicillinase, or, more precisely, penicillin beta-lactamase, which breaks a chemical bond in the key lactam structure of penicillin molecules.

Among the first responses were the synthesis of penicillins, such as methicillin, which protected this bond. In time, however, methicillin did not work on some bacteria, beginning with Staphylococcus aureus. Since S. aureus is an important pathogen, common in wound infection but also appearing in systemic disease, methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus ('MRSA) became a matter of close surveillance by infectious disease specialists.

Another approach was to co-administer a penicillin with a penicillinase inhibitor, such as clavulanic acid.

In serious infections with MRSA, the "last resort" tended to be vancomycin. Since vancomycin, for systemic infections, must be administered intravenously, it was relatively easy to restrict it to controlled hospital use, only for specific strains. Eventually, vancomycin resistance was seen among staphylococci; acquired resistance was first observed in Enterococci.

Bacterial resistance to the tetracyclines

Glycylcyclines were developed to "evade" resistance mechanisms of tetracyclines.

Multiple antibiotic therapy

A desperately ill patient may be treated with "shotgun" therapy before there is a firm diagnosis, using several antibiotics of which one or more reasonably may be expected to be effective. Cultures are taken before therapy begins, and the drugs changed when sensitivity results are back.

Several antibiotics are always given together for synergistic effect, such as trimethoprim-sulfisoxazole. In other cases, multiple antibiotics are given to avoid resistance formation in certain species, such as Mycobacteria. Quinupristin-dalfopristin, however, are a pair of streptogramin-class indicated for critical resistant forms, such as MRSA.

References

  1. Costelloe, Ceire; Chris Metcalfe, Andrew Lovering, David Mant, Alastair D Hay (2010-05-18). "Effect of antibiotic prescribing in primary care on antimicrobial resistance in individual patients: systematic review and meta-analysis". BMJ 340 (may18_2): c2096. DOI:10.1136/bmj.c2096. Retrieved on 2010-05-19. Research Blogging.
  2. Ong S, Nakase J, Moran GJ, Karras DJ, Kuehnert MJ, Talan DA (2007). "Antibiotic use for emergency department patients with upper respiratory infections: prescribing practices, patient expectations, and patient satisfaction". Annals of emergency medicine 50 (3): 213-20. DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.03.026. PMID 17467120. Research Blogging.
  3. Linder JA, Doctor JN, Friedberg MW, Reyes Nieva H, Birks C, Meeker D et al. (2014). "Time of Day and the Decision to Prescribe Antibiotics.". JAMA Intern Med. DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5225. PMID 25286067. Research Blogging.
  4. Butler CC, Hood K, Verheij T, et al. (2009). "Variation in antibiotic prescribing and its impact on recovery in patients with acute cough in primary care: prospective study in 13 countries". BMJ 338: b2242. PMID 19549995[e]
  5. Ranji SR, Steinman MA, Shojania KG, Gonzales R (August 2008). "Interventions to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing: a systematic review and quantitative analysis". Med Care 46 (8): 847–62. DOI:10.1097/MLR.0b013e318178eabd. PMID 18665065. Research Blogging.
  6. Metlay JP, Camargo CA, MacKenzie T, et al (2007). "Cluster-randomized trial to improve antibiotic use for adults with acute respiratory infections treated in emergency departments". Annals of emergency medicine 50 (3): 221-30. DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.03.022. PMID 17509729. Research Blogging.
  7. Spurling G, Del Mar C, Dooley L, Foxlee R (2007). "Delayed antibiotics for respiratory infections". Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online) (3): CD004417. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD004417.pub3. PMID 17636757. Research Blogging.
  8. Moore M, Little P, Rumsby K, Kelly J, Watson L, Warner G et al. (2009). "Effect of antibiotic prescribing strategies and an information leaflet on longer-term reconsultation for acute lower respiratory tract infection.". Br J Gen Pract 59 (567): 728-34. DOI:10.3399/bjgp09X472601. PMID 19843421. PMC PMC2751917. Research Blogging.
  9. Little P, Turner S, Rumsby K, et al (March 2009). "Dipsticks and diagnostic algorithms in urinary tract infection: development and validation, randomised trial, economic analysis, observational cohort and qualitative study". Health Technol Assess 13 (19): iii–iv, ix–xi, 1–73. DOI:10.3310/hta13190. PMID 19364448. Research Blogging.
  10. Oliveira CF, Botoni FA, Oliveira CR, Silva CB, Pereira HA, Serufo JC et al. (2013). "Procalcitonin versus C-reactive protein for guiding antibiotic therapy in sepsis: a randomized trial.". Crit Care Med 41 (10): 2336-43. DOI:10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828e969f. PMID 23921272. Research Blogging.
  11. Cals JW, Butler CC, Hopstaken RM, Hood K, Dinant GJ (2009). "Effect of point of care testing for C reactive protein and training in communication skills on antibiotic use in lower respiratory tract infections: cluster randomised trial". BMJ 338: b1374. PMID 19416992. PMC 2677640[e]
  12. Christ-Crain M, Stolz D, Bingisser R, et al. (July 2006). "Procalcitonin guidance of antibiotic therapy in community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized trial". Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 174 (1): 84–93. DOI:10.1164/rccm.200512-1922OC. PMID 16603606. Research Blogging.
  13. Stolz D, Christ-Crain M, Bingisser R, et al. (January 2007). "Antibiotic treatment of exacerbations of COPD: a randomized, controlled trial comparing procalcitonin-guidance with standard therapy". Chest 131 (1): 9–19. DOI:10.1378/chest.06-1500. PMID 17218551. Research Blogging.
  14. Christ-Crain M, Jaccard-Stolz D, Bingisser R, et al. (February 2004). "Effect of procalcitonin-guided treatment on antibiotic use and outcome in lower respiratory tract infections: cluster-randomised, single-blinded intervention trial". Lancet 363 (9409): 600–7. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15591-8. PMID 14987884. Research Blogging.
  15. Briel M, Schuetz P, Mueller B, et al (October 2008). "Procalcitonin-guided antibiotic use vs a standard approach for acute respiratory tract infections in primary care". Archives of internal medicine 168 (18): 2000–7; discussion 2007–8. DOI:10.1001/archinte.168.18.2000. PMID 18852401. Research Blogging.
  16. Arjun Srinivasan (15 November 2010), Three Steps to Antibiotic Stewardship, [{Centers for Disease Control]]