Polywater: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>George Swan (first draft) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| author=Phil Attard | | author=Phil Attard | ||
| date= | | date= | ||
| accessdate=2008-06-25 | |||
| quote= | |||
}}</ref><ref name=Bjps1991> | |||
{{cite paper | |||
| url=http://bjps.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/citation/42/3/295 | |||
| title=Discussion: Polywater and Experimental Realism | |||
| page= | |||
| pages=295-307 | |||
| publisher=[[British Journal for the Philosophy of Science]] | |||
| issue=3 | |||
| volume=42 | |||
| author=[[William J. McKinney]] | |||
| date=1991 | |||
| accessdate=2008-06-25 | |||
| quote= | |||
}}</ref><ref name=Bjps1993> | |||
{{cite news | |||
| url=http://bjps.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/citation/42/3/295 | |||
| title=Discussion: Polywater and Experimental Realism | |||
| page= | |||
| pages=775-784 | |||
| author=[[J. Van Brakel]] | |||
| publisher=[[British Journal for the Philosophy of Science]] | |||
| volume=44 | |||
| date=1994 | |||
| accessdate=2008-06-25 | |||
| quote= | |||
}}</ref><ref name=Atg> | |||
{{cite news | |||
| url=http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/ATG/polywater.html | |||
| title=POLYWATER AND THE ROLE OF SKEPTICISM | |||
| date=1995 | |||
| accessdate=2008-06-25 | | accessdate=2008-06-25 | ||
| quote= | | quote= | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
Poly water was said to be a kind or ordered liquid water, formed in very thin quartz capillary tubes. | |||
Poly water was said to have a much lower freezing point than regular water, a much higher boiling point, and to be extremely viscous. | |||
Research grants requests were written.<ref name=PhilAttardPolywater/> Studies were conducted. In the end it turned out that the anomalous properties were due to impurities in the tubes -- not due to the discovery of a new form of liquid water. | Research grants requests were written.<ref name=PhilAttardPolywater/> Studies were conducted. In the end it turned out that the anomalous properties were due to impurities in the tubes -- not due to the discovery of a new form of liquid water. | ||
Like [[N-Rays]], polywater is cited as a warning against scientific hubris.<ref name=PhilAttardPolywater/> | Like [[N-Rays]], polywater is cited as a warning against scientific hubris.<ref name=PhilAttardPolywater/><ref name=Atg/><ref name=Hyle> | ||
{{cite news | |||
| url=http://www.hyle.org/journal/issues/8-1/bauer.htm | |||
| title=‘Pathological Science’ is not Scientific Misconduct (nor is it pathological) | |||
| page= | |||
| pages=5-20 | |||
| publisher=International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry | |||
| volume=8, | |||
| issue=1 | |||
| author=[[Henry H. Bauer]] | |||
| date=2002 | |||
| accessdate=2008-06-25 | |||
| quote= | |||
}}</ref> | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references/> | <references/>[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]] | ||
Latest revision as of 16:01, 5 October 2024
In the 1960s claims were made that scientific studies had confirmed an hither-to unknown phase of water, called polywater.[1][2][3][4] Poly water was said to be a kind or ordered liquid water, formed in very thin quartz capillary tubes. Poly water was said to have a much lower freezing point than regular water, a much higher boiling point, and to be extremely viscous.
Research grants requests were written.[1] Studies were conducted. In the end it turned out that the anomalous properties were due to impurities in the tubes -- not due to the discovery of a new form of liquid water.
Like N-Rays, polywater is cited as a warning against scientific hubris.[1][4][5]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Phil Attard. What is polywater?, University of Sydney. Retrieved on 2008-06-25.
- ↑ William J. McKinney (1991). Discussion: Polywater and Experimental Realism. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. Retrieved on 2008-06-25.
- ↑ J. Van Brakel. Discussion: Polywater and Experimental Realism, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1994, pp. 775-784. Retrieved on 2008-06-25.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 POLYWATER AND THE ROLE OF SKEPTICISM, 1995. Retrieved on 2008-06-25.
- ↑ Henry H. Bauer. ‘Pathological Science’ is not Scientific Misconduct (nor is it pathological), International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry, 2002, pp. 5-20. Retrieved on 2008-06-25.