Adkins v. Children's Hospital: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>David E. Volk
m (subpages)
mNo edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
'''Adkins v. Children's Hospital''' was a 1923 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that struck down a minimum wage law; 61 U.S. 525 (1923)
'''Adkins v. Children's Hospital''' was a 1923 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that struck down a minimum wage law; 61 U.S. 525 (1923, overruled 1937).


It held unconstitutional an act of Congress that created a minimum wage board to ascertain and fix adequate wages for women employees in the District of Columbia. The question before the Court was whether the act of Congress constituted a deprivation of "life, liberty or property without due process of law" under the Fifth Amendment. The Court held by a vote of five to three that the act was an unjustified interference by Congress with the freedom of employer and employee to contract as they pleased. Justices [[William H. Taft]], Edward Sanford, and [[Oliver Wendell Holmes]], dissenting, took the view that the Fifth Amendment did not stand in the way of reasonable legislation calculated to correct admitted evils. The case was expressly overruled by [[New Deal]] Court "West Coast Hotel Company v. Parrish," 57 Supreme Court 578 (1937).  
It held unconstitutional an act of Congress that created a minimum wage board to ascertain and fix adequate wages for women employees in the District of Columbia. The question before the Court was whether the act of Congress constituted a deprivation of "life, liberty or property without due process of law" under the Fifth Amendment. The Court held by a vote of five to three that the act was an unjustified interference by Congress with the freedom of employer and employee to contract as they pleased. Justices [[William H. Taft]], Edward Sanford, and [[Oliver Wendell Holmes]], dissenting, took the view that the Fifth Amendment did not stand in the way of reasonable legislation calculated to correct admitted evils. The case was expressly overruled by the [[New Deal]] Court in ''West Coast Hotel Company v. Parrish,'' 300 U.S. 379 (1937).
==Bibliography==
 
* Zimmerman, Joan G. "The Jurisprudence of Equality: The Women's Minimum Wage, the First Equal Rights Amendment, and Adkins v. Children's Hospital, 1905-1923," ''The Journal of American History,'' Vol. 78, No. 1 (Jun., 1991), pp. 188-225  [http://www.jstor.org/pss/2078093 in JSTOR]
==References==
{{reflist}}
 
[[Category:Reviewed Passed]][[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]]

Latest revision as of 11:01, 6 July 2024

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Adkins v. Children's Hospital was a 1923 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that struck down a minimum wage law; 61 U.S. 525 (1923, overruled 1937).

It held unconstitutional an act of Congress that created a minimum wage board to ascertain and fix adequate wages for women employees in the District of Columbia. The question before the Court was whether the act of Congress constituted a deprivation of "life, liberty or property without due process of law" under the Fifth Amendment. The Court held by a vote of five to three that the act was an unjustified interference by Congress with the freedom of employer and employee to contract as they pleased. Justices William H. Taft, Edward Sanford, and Oliver Wendell Holmes, dissenting, took the view that the Fifth Amendment did not stand in the way of reasonable legislation calculated to correct admitted evils. The case was expressly overruled by the New Deal Court in West Coast Hotel Company v. Parrish, 300 U.S. 379 (1937).

References