User talk:Paul Schächterle/Notebook/LDR: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Nick Gardner (New page: I am afraid that this is confused and inaccurate. For a correct statement of the law see microeconomics..~~~~) |
imported>Paul Schächterle No edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I am afraid that this is confused and inaccurate. For a correct statement of the law see [[microeconomics]]..[[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 09: | I am afraid that this is confused and inaccurate. For a correct statement of the law see [[microeconomics]]..[[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 09:49, 15 May 2008 (CDT) | ||
:Hi Nick, Thanks for your message! It is a very raw draft, that's why I did not put it in an article. If you like tell me which parts you dislike the most. Maybe we could then start the real article together? Greetings! --[[User:Paul Schächterle|Paul Schächterle]] 13:01, 15 May 2008 (CDT) | |||
:I am quite new here. I have just seen the article list for missing core articles on the group page. Should I put the name of the article there? --[[User:Paul Schächterle|Paul Schächterle]] 13:08, 15 May 2008 (CDT) | |||
:I have started the article, so that you and everyone can comment on it and change it. Many references are still missing though. --[[User:Paul Schächterle|Paul Schächterle]] 14:32, 15 May 2008 (CDT) | |||
I am sorry Paul, but I can't help you. I have decided, for very compelling reasons, to stop taking part in Citizendium for some months, if not longer. I just happened to see your piece and I felt bound to warn you about your misunderstanding. You don't really need my help in any case. The information that you need can be found in any elementary economics textbook. After you have done the necessary reading, you need to abandon the present draft altogether and make a fresh start. I wish you the best of luck with it. [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 15:19, 15 May 2008 (CDT) | |||
:Hi Nick, thanks for your advice. I will definitely do that and take a second look into the standard textbooks. Maybe some of the other authors will comment on the article, too, and/or alter it. Bye! --[[User:Paul Schächterle|Paul Schächterle]] 15:29, 15 May 2008 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:29, 15 May 2008
I am afraid that this is confused and inaccurate. For a correct statement of the law see microeconomics..Nick Gardner 09:49, 15 May 2008 (CDT)
- Hi Nick, Thanks for your message! It is a very raw draft, that's why I did not put it in an article. If you like tell me which parts you dislike the most. Maybe we could then start the real article together? Greetings! --Paul Schächterle 13:01, 15 May 2008 (CDT)
- I am quite new here. I have just seen the article list for missing core articles on the group page. Should I put the name of the article there? --Paul Schächterle 13:08, 15 May 2008 (CDT)
- I have started the article, so that you and everyone can comment on it and change it. Many references are still missing though. --Paul Schächterle 14:32, 15 May 2008 (CDT)
I am sorry Paul, but I can't help you. I have decided, for very compelling reasons, to stop taking part in Citizendium for some months, if not longer. I just happened to see your piece and I felt bound to warn you about your misunderstanding. You don't really need my help in any case. The information that you need can be found in any elementary economics textbook. After you have done the necessary reading, you need to abandon the present draft altogether and make a fresh start. I wish you the best of luck with it. Nick Gardner 15:19, 15 May 2008 (CDT)
- Hi Nick, thanks for your advice. I will definitely do that and take a second look into the standard textbooks. Maybe some of the other authors will comment on the article, too, and/or alter it. Bye! --Paul Schächterle 15:29, 15 May 2008 (CDT)