Logistics (military): Difference between revisions
imported>Caesar Schinas m (Robot: Changing template: TOC-right) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (12 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
'''Logistics''' make it possible for military units to be ready to fight, and have the materials to conduct and sustain the fight. Sometimes, in very informal military discussions, someone will offer a toast: "Amateurs talk tactics. Dilettantes talk strategy. Professionals talk logistics." Obviously, the toast was offered by someone with a bias toward logistics, but there is much truth to it. Strategy determines why to fight, the form of one's forces, and where to fight. Tactics defines how the fight is conducted once begun. | '''Logistics''' make it possible for military units to be ready to fight, and have the materials to conduct and sustain the fight. Sometimes, in very informal military discussions, someone will offer a toast: "Amateurs talk tactics. Dilettantes talk strategy. Professionals talk logistics." Obviously, the toast was offered by someone with a bias toward logistics, but there is much truth to it. Strategy determines why to fight, the form of one's forces, and where to fight. Tactics defines how the fight is conducted once begun. | ||
Napoleon is said to have observed "an army marches on its stomach", meaning that no army can function without a supply of food, and making sure that food is available, in adequate | Napoleon is said to have observed "an army marches on its stomach", meaning that no army can function without a supply of food, and making sure that food is available, in adequate quantities, is a basic part of the supply discipline of logistics. A different discipline, transportation, ensures the food gets from the port where it arrives on a ship, to the cooks that will prepare it. Both operational procedures and research have places in research, just as combat forces have their rules on how to encircle a military force with a helicopter-borne (i.e., air assault) unit, logisticians worked out the procedure by which a short-ranged helicopter can be refueled at each jump closer to its target. | ||
In the United States military, chosen here because it tends to write down more about the way it does things than any other military, logistics is<ref name=JP1-02>{{citation | In the United States military, chosen here because it tends to write down more about the way it does things than any other military, logistics is<ref name=JP1-02>{{citation | ||
| last = US Department of Defense | | last = US Department of Defense | ||
| Line 18: | Line 17: | ||
and d. acquisition or furnishing of services|Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms}} | and d. acquisition or furnishing of services|Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms}} | ||
NATO logistical doctrine <ref name=NATOLog>{{citation | |||
|title= NATO Logistics Handbook, Third Edition | |title= NATO Logistics Handbook, Third Edition | ||
| author = Senior NATO Logisticians' Conference Secretariat | | author = Senior NATO Logisticians' Conference Secretariat | ||
| Line 74: | Line 73: | ||
| Budget and finance | | Budget and finance | ||
|} | |} | ||
==History== | ==History== | ||
Napoleon Bonaparte made significant advances in logistics. While he did not have a full general staff organization in the modern sense, he still had officers moving ahead of his armies, being sure they would have the appropriate resources from the local area, as well as weapons and other supplies from the rear. <ref name=NapLog>{{citation | |||
| title = Rise and fall of the strategy of exhaustion: technological changes gave birth to a new strategy of warfare aimed at an enemy's logistics—and to its demise | | title = Rise and fall of the strategy of exhaustion: technological changes gave birth to a new strategy of warfare aimed at an enemy's logistics—and to its demise | ||
| journal = Army Logistician | | journal = Army Logistician | ||
| date = Nov-Dec 2004 | | date = Nov-Dec 2004 | ||
| first =Lawrence M. | last =Smith | | first =Lawrence M. | last =Smith | ||
| url = http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0PAI/is_6_36/ai_n8578800}}</ref> Napoleon's campaigns, however, were directed against the defeat of armies in the field. In the | | url = http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0PAI/is_6_36/ai_n8578800}}</ref> Napoleon's campaigns, however, were directed against the defeat of armies in the field. In the American Civil War, a major strategic emphasis shifted to destroying the enemy's logistics, destroying the ability of armies to continue fighting. In such a situation, Carl von Clausewitz would describe logistics as a center of gravity. | ||
Changing centers of gravity from combat forces to logistics was partially the result of technological advances such as railroads and the telegraph. Another key aspect was the increased lethality of repeating and rifled weapons, such that a prepared defense could be nearly invulnerable to direct attack, as tragically demonstrated by | Changing centers of gravity from combat forces to logistics was partially the result of technological advances such as railroads and the telegraph. Another key aspect was the increased lethality of repeating and rifled weapons, such that a prepared defense could be nearly invulnerable to direct attack, as tragically demonstrated by Battle of Gettysburg# Pickett's Charge|Pickett's Charge at the Battle of Gettysburg. Doctrine had not yet evolved to make use of breakthrough techniques, such as was seen by the failure of the Battle of the Crater. | ||
William T. Sherman attacked logistics in several ways, starting with the destruction of railroads and telegraph lines. Sherman's March to the Sea demonstrated destroying the means of production. | |||
==Classes of Supply and Support== | ==Classes of Supply and Support== | ||
A number of standard classes are defined recognized at the United Nations level,<ref name=UN>{{citation | A number of standard classes are defined recognized at the United Nations level,<ref name=UN>{{citation | ||
| Line 124: | Line 124: | ||
| row 1, cell 3 | | row 1, cell 3 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| VII: Major end item <ref>standalone item such as a | | VII: Major end item <ref>standalone item such as a tank, truck, or artillery piece</ref> | ||
| Need to arrive ready-to-use at exchange points | | Need to arrive ready-to-use at exchange points | ||
| Need to arrive ready-to-use, with crew if necessary, at pickup points | | Need to arrive ready-to-use, with crew if necessary, at pickup points | ||
| Line 155: | Line 155: | ||
When a support unit is put into direct support of a unit taking action, the support unit exclusively meets the need of the supported unit unless its own chain of command changes the assignment. When in general support of a larger unit, in principle, all sub-units receive equal support unless specific orders come through the chain of command. | When a support unit is put into direct support of a unit taking action, the support unit exclusively meets the need of the supported unit unless its own chain of command changes the assignment. When in general support of a larger unit, in principle, all sub-units receive equal support unless specific orders come through the chain of command. | ||
==Staff logisticians versus logistical units== | ==Staff logisticians versus logistical units== | ||
In military operations, there typically must be two types of logisticians: a staff logistics officer and a commander of the support organization. Evem in organizations as small as a | In military operations, there typically must be two types of logisticians: a staff logistics officer and a commander of the support organization. Evem in organizations as small as a battalion, commanded by a lieutenant colonel, the "S-4", usually a captain, has the staff responsibility, but the executive officer, a major, runs the rear support area. For a large campaign, such as the Gulf War, MG Dane Starling was the "J-4" deputy chief of staff for logistics, United States Central Command, but the actual rear operations were conducted by the 22nd Support Command, under LTG William (Gus) Pagonis. Pagonis was the only general promoted during the Gulf War, as GEN Schwarzkopf decided he needed authority equal to the other three-star corps and component commanders. | ||
==Supply== | ==Supply== | ||
The section above on supply classes gave guidance on priorities. There are, however, several issues in actually providing the supplies even within a category. | |||
===Supplying tactical units=== | |||
"Push" models are driven by the logisticians, sending forward predicted amounts. This has the advantage of relieving the supported staff from the need to prepare supply requests, but does create the possibility that the units of issue "pushed" may not be what is most needed. "Pull", on the other hand, is driven by the combat unit staff. | |||
As advanced militaries develop automated inventory networks between the supporting and supported networks, the relationship between push and pull may disappear. A standard ammunition issue might contain, hypothetically, 1500 155mm howitzer shells, 3000 81mm mortar shells, and 100,000 rounds of 5.56mm rifle and machine gun ammunition, but if only the artillery ammunition was expended, only it needs to be resupplied. An intelligent logistics system might recognize a higher-than-usual utilization and push additional shells forward. | |||
===Resupplying logistical units=== | |||
Supply units providing general and direct support, in turn, need to be resupplied with bulk packages of the items they will issue at the "retail" level. | |||
In naval operations, high-speed replenishment ships travel with the tactical formations and provide direct support. Replenishment ships tend to be multifunctional, handling fuel, ammunition and general supplies. They, in turn, are resupplied at sea, usually by specialized transports such as ammunition ships and oiler (ship)|oilers. | |||
===Base-level resupply=== | |||
Ships and aircraft may also return to bases for large supply. Such ports and airfields are not always secure; the USS Cole (DDG-67)|''USS Cole''' (DDG-67) was struck by a suicide attack in the neutral port of Aden, Yemen. In Operation Desert Storm, the largest single loss of life came when an SS-1 SCUD missile hit a logistical facility. | |||
==Maintenance== | ==Maintenance== | ||
In general, maintenance is organized into "echelons", the number of which vary with the type of unit, country, size of operation, and other factors. Depending on the item being maintained and the nature of the part being fixed, there often needs to be a decision, perhaps specific to each echelon, of "repair versus replace". It is possible to field-strip and clean a jammed rifle, but it is not possible to do maintenance on the monolithic | In general, maintenance is organized into "echelons", the number of which vary with the type of unit, country, size of operation, and other factors. Depending on the item being maintained and the nature of the part being fixed, there often needs to be a decision, perhaps specific to each echelon, of "repair versus replace". It is possible to field-strip and clean a jammed rifle, but it is not possible to do maintenance on the monolithic circuit boards and integrated circuits of a modern tactical radio. Some electronics can have board-level replacements, but others are effectively sealed units. | ||
#Self-maintenance: rifle cleaning, air filter changing, computer dusting. May not be present for aircraft, where the flight crew verifies but there is a separate ground crew | #Self-maintenance: rifle cleaning, air filter changing, computer dusting. May not be present for aircraft, where the flight crew verifies but there is a separate ground crew | ||
| Line 169: | Line 181: | ||
| url = http://www.rand.org/pubs/reports/R1923/}}</ref> | | url = http://www.rand.org/pubs/reports/R1923/}}</ref> | ||
#Depot: shipped back to factory-level operation for rebuild | #Depot: shipped back to factory-level operation for rebuild | ||
Image:Div Maint Compound.jpg|thumb|Division maintenance area, 1991 | |||
One of the challenges facing multinational coalitions and developing militaries is the commitment to maintenance, and the cultural attitudes toward it. This can be a problem even in the "First World", as people of different countries had different experiences growing up and living in the culture. For example, in the Second World War, the British needed to set up a transport branch of the Royal Army Service Corps, and train and assign soldiers as drivers who could do self-maintenance. In the U.S. military of the time, the default assumption was that a soldier could drive, and at least change a tire and add oil, at the time of enlistment. | One of the challenges facing multinational coalitions and developing militaries is the commitment to maintenance, and the cultural attitudes toward it. This can be a problem even in the "First World", as people of different countries had different experiences growing up and living in the culture. For example, in the Second World War, the British needed to set up a transport branch of the Royal Army Service Corps, and train and assign soldiers as drivers who could do self-maintenance. In the U.S. military of the time, the default assumption was that a soldier could drive, and at least change a tire and add oil, at the time of enlistment. | ||
Some cultures regard manual work as undignified. In a wealthy nation with such beliefs, third-country contractors do the work in peacetime, but, when war breaks out, and a tank engine stops because the air filter is clogged, there may be no contractors on the battlefield. Even the U.S., where maintenance is culturally acceptable, the practice of | Some cultures regard manual work as undignified. In a wealthy nation with such beliefs, third-country contractors do the work in peacetime, but, when war breaks out, and a tank engine stops because the air filter is clogged, there may be no contractors on the battlefield. Even the U.S., where maintenance is culturally acceptable, the practice of outsourcing raise issues of whether maintenance technicians will be present in a place where bullets fly. | ||
==Civil engineering and facility procurement== | ==Civil engineering and facility procurement== | ||
Beans and bullets do not last well if they are kept in the rain. Logisticians have to have transportation routes from the source of supply, to the warehousing and distribution points, to the supported units. Minimally, this means that things such as roads, airfields, docks and warehouses need either to be built by civil engineers (contrast with | Beans and bullets do not last well if they are kept in the rain. Logisticians have to have transportation routes from the source of supply, to the warehousing and distribution points, to the supported units. Minimally, this means that things such as roads, airfields, docks and warehouses need either to be built by civil engineers (contrast with combat engineers), or perhaps it will be possible to locate, rent, and customize warehouses and other facilities. | ||
== | |||
==Footnotes== | |||
<small> | |||
<references> | |||
</references> | |||
</small> | |||
Category:Reviewed Passed if Improved]][[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]] | |||
Latest revision as of 07:00, 13 September 2024
Logistics make it possible for military units to be ready to fight, and have the materials to conduct and sustain the fight. Sometimes, in very informal military discussions, someone will offer a toast: "Amateurs talk tactics. Dilettantes talk strategy. Professionals talk logistics." Obviously, the toast was offered by someone with a bias toward logistics, but there is much truth to it. Strategy determines why to fight, the form of one's forces, and where to fight. Tactics defines how the fight is conducted once begun.
Napoleon is said to have observed "an army marches on its stomach", meaning that no army can function without a supply of food, and making sure that food is available, in adequate quantities, is a basic part of the supply discipline of logistics. A different discipline, transportation, ensures the food gets from the port where it arrives on a ship, to the cooks that will prepare it. Both operational procedures and research have places in research, just as combat forces have their rules on how to encircle a military force with a helicopter-borne (i.e., air assault) unit, logisticians worked out the procedure by which a short-ranged helicopter can be refueled at each jump closer to its target.
In the United States military, chosen here because it tends to write down more about the way it does things than any other military, logistics is[1]:
The science of planning and carrying out the movement and maintenance of forces.
In its most comprehensive sense, those aspects of military operations that deal with: a. design and development, acquisition, storage, movement, distribution, maintenance, evacuation, and disposition of materiel; b. movement, evacuation, and hospitalization of personnel; c. acquisition or construction, maintenance, operation, and disposition of facilities; and d. acquisition or furnishing of services
— Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms
NATO logistical doctrine [2] recognizes each nation will have its unique approach, but "NATO's principles reflect the additional requirements of operating together in a multinational Alliance." NATO has a useful abstraction of the orientation both of the logistical aspects of obtaining, as well as delivery thereof.
| Logistical resources | Logistical delivery |
|---|---|
| Production Logistics (also known as: acquisition logistics | Cooperative Logistics |
| Consumer Logistics (also known as: operational logistics) | Multinational Logistics |
The primary manual on U.S. logistical doctrine goes further, and defines its scope as "the integration of strategic, operational, and tactical sustainment efforts within the theater, while scheduling the mobilization and deployment of units, personnel, equipment, and supplies in support of the employment concept of a ... commander. The relative combat power that military forces can bring to bear against an enemy is constrained by a nation’s capability to plan for, gain access to, and deliver forces and materiel to the required points of application across the range of military operations."[3]
| Logistical service | Functions that make logistics practical |
|---|---|
| Materiel | Contracting and procurement |
| Supply | logistical planning and research |
| Maintenance and repair | logistical planning and research |
| Transportation | distribution |
| Civil engineering | sustainment |
| Health services | procurement and contracting |
| Mortuary services | disposition and disposal |
| Explosive ordnance disposal | Budget and finance |
History
Napoleon Bonaparte made significant advances in logistics. While he did not have a full general staff organization in the modern sense, he still had officers moving ahead of his armies, being sure they would have the appropriate resources from the local area, as well as weapons and other supplies from the rear. [4] Napoleon's campaigns, however, were directed against the defeat of armies in the field. In the American Civil War, a major strategic emphasis shifted to destroying the enemy's logistics, destroying the ability of armies to continue fighting. In such a situation, Carl von Clausewitz would describe logistics as a center of gravity.
Changing centers of gravity from combat forces to logistics was partially the result of technological advances such as railroads and the telegraph. Another key aspect was the increased lethality of repeating and rifled weapons, such that a prepared defense could be nearly invulnerable to direct attack, as tragically demonstrated by Battle of Gettysburg# Pickett's Charge|Pickett's Charge at the Battle of Gettysburg. Doctrine had not yet evolved to make use of breakthrough techniques, such as was seen by the failure of the Battle of the Crater.
William T. Sherman attacked logistics in several ways, starting with the destruction of railroads and telegraph lines. Sherman's March to the Sea demonstrated destroying the means of production.
Classes of Supply and Support
A number of standard classes are defined recognized at the United Nations level,[5] the management of which vary in the offense and defense. Additional special cases for retreats and pursuits are beyond the scope of this article. [6]
| Supply Class/Support Type | In the offense (maintain the momentum) | In the defense (sustain and increase the combat power) |
|---|---|---|
| I: Rations | Transfer ready-to-eat. | Establish food and water points. Break large shipments into unit loads. |
| II: General support [7] | Low priority during movement but burst supply beforehand | Keep in brigade support area (BSA) |
| III: POL [8] | Push forward to fueling points | Centralize by unit; have daily runs or as appropriate. Break up large volume; keep large tankers in the BSA |
| IV: Barrier materials [9] | Usually not needed in the offense | Highest priority after ammunition |
| V: Ammunition and explosives | Push to ammunition supply point; tends to drop off after initial attack | Need is apt to increase. Balance ease of access versus risk of capture/destruction |
| VI: Personal demand [10] | Low priority, but should be resupplied | row 1, cell 3 |
| VII: Major end item [11] | Need to arrive ready-to-use at exchange points | Need to arrive ready-to-use, with crew if necessary, at pickup points |
| VIII: Medical supplies | High priority, often in ambulances returning to the front | High priority, often in ambulances returning to the front |
| IX: Repair parts | Push forward to repair points; have forward teams determining requirements | Centralize in BSA and pull forward based on need |
| Maintenance support | As far forward as possible | Control centrally; do not risk capture of maintenance points |
| Medical support | As far forward as possible | As far forward as possible |
| Recovery & evacuation of materiel support | As far forward as possible | Avoid capture, destroying if no other choice. If not immediately repairable, evacuate |
| Transportation support | Under extreme stress in the offense. Avoid empty runs in either direction. Balance risk against need | Additional load of backhauling items not needed or unserviceable, without clogging the return lines |
General versus direct support
When a support unit is put into direct support of a unit taking action, the support unit exclusively meets the need of the supported unit unless its own chain of command changes the assignment. When in general support of a larger unit, in principle, all sub-units receive equal support unless specific orders come through the chain of command.
Staff logisticians versus logistical units
In military operations, there typically must be two types of logisticians: a staff logistics officer and a commander of the support organization. Evem in organizations as small as a battalion, commanded by a lieutenant colonel, the "S-4", usually a captain, has the staff responsibility, but the executive officer, a major, runs the rear support area. For a large campaign, such as the Gulf War, MG Dane Starling was the "J-4" deputy chief of staff for logistics, United States Central Command, but the actual rear operations were conducted by the 22nd Support Command, under LTG William (Gus) Pagonis. Pagonis was the only general promoted during the Gulf War, as GEN Schwarzkopf decided he needed authority equal to the other three-star corps and component commanders.
Supply
The section above on supply classes gave guidance on priorities. There are, however, several issues in actually providing the supplies even within a category.
Supplying tactical units
"Push" models are driven by the logisticians, sending forward predicted amounts. This has the advantage of relieving the supported staff from the need to prepare supply requests, but does create the possibility that the units of issue "pushed" may not be what is most needed. "Pull", on the other hand, is driven by the combat unit staff.
As advanced militaries develop automated inventory networks between the supporting and supported networks, the relationship between push and pull may disappear. A standard ammunition issue might contain, hypothetically, 1500 155mm howitzer shells, 3000 81mm mortar shells, and 100,000 rounds of 5.56mm rifle and machine gun ammunition, but if only the artillery ammunition was expended, only it needs to be resupplied. An intelligent logistics system might recognize a higher-than-usual utilization and push additional shells forward.
Resupplying logistical units
Supply units providing general and direct support, in turn, need to be resupplied with bulk packages of the items they will issue at the "retail" level.
In naval operations, high-speed replenishment ships travel with the tactical formations and provide direct support. Replenishment ships tend to be multifunctional, handling fuel, ammunition and general supplies. They, in turn, are resupplied at sea, usually by specialized transports such as ammunition ships and oiler (ship)|oilers.
Base-level resupply
Ships and aircraft may also return to bases for large supply. Such ports and airfields are not always secure; the USS Cole (DDG-67)|USS Cole' (DDG-67) was struck by a suicide attack in the neutral port of Aden, Yemen. In Operation Desert Storm, the largest single loss of life came when an SS-1 SCUD missile hit a logistical facility.
Maintenance
In general, maintenance is organized into "echelons", the number of which vary with the type of unit, country, size of operation, and other factors. Depending on the item being maintained and the nature of the part being fixed, there often needs to be a decision, perhaps specific to each echelon, of "repair versus replace". It is possible to field-strip and clean a jammed rifle, but it is not possible to do maintenance on the monolithic circuit boards and integrated circuits of a modern tactical radio. Some electronics can have board-level replacements, but others are effectively sealed units.
- Self-maintenance: rifle cleaning, air filter changing, computer dusting. May not be present for aircraft, where the flight crew verifies but there is a separate ground crew
- Organic or "base": actions by the combat unit's technicians; "base" tends to be an aircraft oriented term
- Rear area or "intermediate": significant specialist work; may involve exchanging the item being maintained. This level is not always present, especially in the early phases of deployments, or in small deployments[12]
- Depot: shipped back to factory-level operation for rebuild
Image:Div Maint Compound.jpg|thumb|Division maintenance area, 1991
One of the challenges facing multinational coalitions and developing militaries is the commitment to maintenance, and the cultural attitudes toward it. This can be a problem even in the "First World", as people of different countries had different experiences growing up and living in the culture. For example, in the Second World War, the British needed to set up a transport branch of the Royal Army Service Corps, and train and assign soldiers as drivers who could do self-maintenance. In the U.S. military of the time, the default assumption was that a soldier could drive, and at least change a tire and add oil, at the time of enlistment.
Some cultures regard manual work as undignified. In a wealthy nation with such beliefs, third-country contractors do the work in peacetime, but, when war breaks out, and a tank engine stops because the air filter is clogged, there may be no contractors on the battlefield. Even the U.S., where maintenance is culturally acceptable, the practice of outsourcing raise issues of whether maintenance technicians will be present in a place where bullets fly.
Civil engineering and facility procurement
Beans and bullets do not last well if they are kept in the rain. Logisticians have to have transportation routes from the source of supply, to the warehousing and distribution points, to the supported units. Minimally, this means that things such as roads, airfields, docks and warehouses need either to be built by civil engineers (contrast with combat engineers), or perhaps it will be possible to locate, rent, and customize warehouses and other facilities.
Footnotes
- ↑ US Department of Defense (12 July 2007), Joint Publication 1-02 Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms
- ↑ Senior NATO Logisticians' Conference Secretariat (October 1997), NATO Logistics Handbook, Third Edition
- ↑ US Department of Defense (6 April 2000), Joint Publication 1-04 Doctrine for Logistic Support of Joint Operations
- ↑ Smith, Lawrence M. (Nov-Dec 2004), "Rise and fall of the strategy of exhaustion: technological changes gave birth to a new strategy of warfare aimed at an enemy's logistics—and to its demise", Army Logistician
- ↑ United Nations Department of Peacekeeping Operations, United Nations Military Symbols Handbook
- ↑ Edwards, John E. (1993), Combat Service Support Guide, Stackpole
- ↑ clothing, rope, plastic sheets, etc.
- ↑ Petroleum, oil and lubricants
- ↑ Barbed wire, sandbags, etc.
- ↑ soap, razors, candy
- ↑ standalone item such as a tank, truck, or artillery piece
- ↑ Muckstadt, J. A., The Consolidated Support Model (CSM) : A Three-Echelon, Multi-Item Model for Recoverable Items, RAND CorporationDocument Number: R-1923-PR
Category:Reviewed Passed if Improved]]