Talk:William Shakespeare/Works: Difference between revisions
imported>Larry Sanger (New page: Some spell-checking needed here! Excellent precises (what's the plural of precis?). --~~~~) |
imported>Peter Jackson No edit summary |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Excellent precises (what's the plural of precis?). --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 15:32, 1 May 2008 (CDT) | Excellent precises (what's the plural of precis?). --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 15:32, 1 May 2008 (CDT) | ||
:Thanks. Oh, and it's precis too (moose, deer, sheep and sometimes shrimp).-[[User:Derek Hodges|Derek Hodges]] 17:27, 1 May 2008 (CDT) | |||
The list says it's going to follow the 1st folio order but doesn't. Troilus & Cressida is certainly out of order, & I haven't checked evreything. Also, the apocrypha section doesn't distinguish current from outdated scholarly opinions. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 12:12, 29 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
1st fo tragedies order, I think: T & C, Cor, TA, R & J, Tim, JC, Mac, Ham, Lear, Oth, A & C, Cym [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 18:02, 29 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
Just corrected above. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 10:59, 30 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
So R & J and T & C are the ones wrongly positioned. Also, including Pericles & 2 NK under comedies is arbitrary. Traditionally, P is listed under tragedies & 2 NK omitted. I think it would be more sensible to list them separately. | |||
On authorship, I think the position is as follows: | |||
#it is generally accepted that all the plays in the 1st folio are at least partly by him & most of them his sole work | |||
#a minority of scholars believe they're all his sole work | |||
#it's been generally accepted for a long time that Pericles is at least partly by him | |||
#most scholars now accept 2 NK as by Fletcher & Shakespeare | |||
#most scholars accept some material in Sir Thomas More as by Shakespeare | |||
#many scholars accept Edward III as at least partly by him | |||
Additional note: the 1st printings of the ist folio omitted T & C but it was quickly added. | |||
Question: how do we put all this information together in a coherent form? [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 11:08, 30 October 2008 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 06:08, 30 October 2008
Some spell-checking needed here!
Excellent precises (what's the plural of precis?). --Larry Sanger 15:32, 1 May 2008 (CDT)
- Thanks. Oh, and it's precis too (moose, deer, sheep and sometimes shrimp).-Derek Hodges 17:27, 1 May 2008 (CDT)
The list says it's going to follow the 1st folio order but doesn't. Troilus & Cressida is certainly out of order, & I haven't checked evreything. Also, the apocrypha section doesn't distinguish current from outdated scholarly opinions. Peter Jackson 12:12, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
1st fo tragedies order, I think: T & C, Cor, TA, R & J, Tim, JC, Mac, Ham, Lear, Oth, A & C, Cym Peter Jackson 18:02, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Just corrected above. Peter Jackson 10:59, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
So R & J and T & C are the ones wrongly positioned. Also, including Pericles & 2 NK under comedies is arbitrary. Traditionally, P is listed under tragedies & 2 NK omitted. I think it would be more sensible to list them separately.
On authorship, I think the position is as follows:
- it is generally accepted that all the plays in the 1st folio are at least partly by him & most of them his sole work
- a minority of scholars believe they're all his sole work
- it's been generally accepted for a long time that Pericles is at least partly by him
- most scholars now accept 2 NK as by Fletcher & Shakespeare
- most scholars accept some material in Sir Thomas More as by Shakespeare
- many scholars accept Edward III as at least partly by him
Additional note: the 1st printings of the ist folio omitted T & C but it was quickly added.
Question: how do we put all this information together in a coherent form? Peter Jackson 11:08, 30 October 2008 (UTC)