User:George Swan/sandbox/Kristine A. Huskey: Difference between revisions
imported>Hayford Peirce m (Kristine A. Huskey moved to User:George Swan/sandbox/Kristine A. Huskey: Editor's recommendation to move article from mainspace to userspace) |
Pat Palmer (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
'''Kristine Huskey''' is an [[United States|American]] lawyer.<ref name=UniversityOfWashingtonCollegeOfLaw> | '''Kristine Huskey''' is an [[United States of America|American]] lawyer.<ref name=UniversityOfWashingtonCollegeOfLaw> | ||
{{cite web | {{cite web | ||
| url=http://www.wcl.american.edu/faculty/huskey/ | | url=http://www.wcl.american.edu/faculty/huskey/ | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
*[[George Washington University]] [[George Washington University Law School|Law School]] | *[[George Washington University]] [[George Washington University Law School|Law School]] | ||
Huskey worked for the large [[New York]]-based law firm [[Shearman & Sterling]]. | Huskey worked for the large [[New York (disambiguation)|New York]]-based law firm [[Shearman & Sterling]]. | ||
It was while working at Shearman & Sterling that Huskey volunteered to help defend Guantanamo captives. | It was while working at Shearman & Sterling that Huskey volunteered to help defend Guantanamo captives. | ||
Huskey was one of the lawyers who worked on [[Rasul v. Bush]].<ref name=UniversityOfWashingtonCollegeOfLaw/> | Huskey was one of the lawyers who worked on [[Rasul v. Bush]].<ref name=UniversityOfWashingtonCollegeOfLaw/> | ||
Latest revision as of 15:23, 8 April 2023
This is a draft in User space, not yet ready to go to Citizendium's main space, and not meant to be cited. The {{subpages}} template is designed to be used within article clusters and their related pages.
It will not function on User pages.
Kristine Huskey is an American lawyer.[1]
Studies
| 1992 | B.A. Columbia University |
| 1997 | J.D. University of Texas School of Law |
Professional career
Huskey has served as a visiting professor, at various institutions, specializing in human rights, including[1]:
- American University Washington College of Law
- Victoria University of Wellington, Faculty of Law
- George Washington University Law School
Huskey worked for the large New York-based law firm Shearman & Sterling. It was while working at Shearman & Sterling that Huskey volunteered to help defend Guantanamo captives. Huskey was one of the lawyers who worked on Rasul v. Bush.[1]
Huskey had worked for Canadian Guantanamo captive Omar Khadr, one of the ten captives who has faced charges before a Guantanamo military commission.[2] Huskey is the author of "Standards and Procedures for Classifying “Enemy Combatants”: Congress, What Have You Done?" -- published by the Texas International Law Journal.[3] Huskey wrote an article entitled: "The administration has already begun trying to work its way around the Supreme Court's Hamdan decision", in the American Prospect.[4]
In an interview with the Council on Hemispheric Affairs Huskey said[2]:
“It’s so easy to say that they are terrorists and that terrorists don’t deserve rights, but because they were never given rights to begin with, like the right to a fair trial for instance, how did we reach the decision that they are even terrorists?”
Huskey told WJLA that she received death threats because of her work helping Guantanamo captives.[5] WJLA reported that Huskey paid 13 visits to Guantanamo.
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Kristine Huskey: Practitioner in Residence, International Human Rights Clinic. University of Washington College of Law. Retrieved on 2007-07-14.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; no text was provided for refs namedCoha20070714 - ↑ Kristine A. Huskey. Standards and Procedures for Classifying “Enemy Combatants”: Congress, What Have You Done?, Texas International Law Journal, Fall 2007. Retrieved on 2008-04-29. “When I began down this road five years ago, Guantánamo was literally a “legal black hole.”1 The Supreme Court changed much of that in June of 2004 when it ruled in my case, Al Odah v. United States, joined with Rasul v. Bush,2 that the detainees were entitled to bring habeas corpus petitions in federal court to challenge their detention. But after two years of fighting with the government over the meaning of Rasul, Congress abruptly passed the Military Commissions Act of 2006 (“MCA”),3 which ostensibly strips the Guantánamo detainees of the right to challenge any aspect of their detention, including the right to habeas corpus. Remarkably, we are almost exactly where we were five years ago, except that now, Congress has weighed in and approved of Guantánamo as a virtual law-free zone.”
- ↑ Kristine A. Huskey (August 13 2006). The administration has already begun trying to work its way around the Supreme Court's Hamdan decision.. American Prospect. Retrieved on 2007-07-14.
- ↑ Working Women: Kristine Huskey, WJLA, Friday July 6 2007. Retrieved on 2007-07-14.