Back-chaining: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>John Stephenson
(Back-chaining better-respects phonology of English)
mNo edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Back-chaining''' is a useful technique in teaching [[spoken language|oral language]] skills, particularly when it comes to [[syllable|polysyllabic]] [[word]]s. Suppose, for example, you are teaching someone to pronounce the name ‘[[Modest Mussorgsky|Mussorgsky]]’.  First, you get them to say the last syllable, ‘-sky’; then to repeat it, with '-sorg-' attached before: ‘-sorgsky’; and then all that remains is the first syllable: ‘Mus-sorg-sky’.  This technique is easier for the learner than the more obvious front-chaining, starting with the first syllable, as it requires the learner to put the new element first, where it is less easily forgotten.
{{subpages}}
'''Back-chaining''' is a useful technique in teaching [[spoken language|oral language]] skills, particularly when it comes to [[syllable|polysyllabic]] [[word]]s. For example, ‘[[Modest Mussorgsky|Mussorgsky]]’ is a difficult name for many non-RussiansThe teacher first gets the students to say the last syllable, ‘-sky’; then to repeat it, with '-sorg-' attached before: ‘-sorgsky’; and then all that remains is the first syllable: ‘Mus-sorg-sky’.  This technique is easier for learners than the more obvious front-chaining, starting with the first syllable, as it requires them to put the new element first, where it is less easily forgotten.


Back-chaining also respects the [[phonology|phonological]] structure of [[English language|English]] better than front-chaining: as there is usually no difference in [[stress (linguistics)|stress]] between a word spoken in isolation and one spoken at the end of a sentence,<ref>Compare ''psychological'' in isolation, ''it's psychological'' and ''psychological profile'', where only in the last does the main stress shift to another syllable.</ref> it is arguably better to begin with the final syllable (main stress in '''bold'''):
Back-chaining also respects the [[phonology|phonological]] structure of [[English language|English]] better than front-chaining: as there is usually no difference in [[stress (linguistics)|stress]] between a word spoken in isolation and one spoken at the end of a sentence,<ref>Compare ''psychological'' in isolation, ''it's psychological'' and ''psychological profile'', where only in the last does the main stress shift to another syllable.</ref> it is arguably better to begin with the final syllable (main stress in '''bold'''):


''Chaining sequences for the English word 'aroma'''
''Chaining sequences for the English word 'aroma':''


:(1) ''Front-chaining'': [ə] - [ə.'''ɹəʊ'''] - [ə.'''ɹəʊ'''.mə]
:(1) ''Front-chaining'': [ə] - [ə.'''ɹəʊ'''] - [ə.'''ɹəʊ'''.mə]
Line 14: Line 15:
<div class="references-2column">
<div class="references-2column">
<references/>
<references/>
</div>
</div>[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]]
 
==See also==
*[[Syllable]]
*[[Stress (linguistics)]]
*[[Second language acquisition]]

Latest revision as of 16:00, 15 July 2024

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Back-chaining is a useful technique in teaching oral language skills, particularly when it comes to polysyllabic words. For example, ‘Mussorgsky’ is a difficult name for many non-Russians. The teacher first gets the students to say the last syllable, ‘-sky’; then to repeat it, with '-sorg-' attached before: ‘-sorgsky’; and then all that remains is the first syllable: ‘Mus-sorg-sky’. This technique is easier for learners than the more obvious front-chaining, starting with the first syllable, as it requires them to put the new element first, where it is less easily forgotten.

Back-chaining also respects the phonological structure of English better than front-chaining: as there is usually no difference in stress between a word spoken in isolation and one spoken at the end of a sentence,[1] it is arguably better to begin with the final syllable (main stress in bold):

Chaining sequences for the English word 'aroma':

(1) Front-chaining: [ə] - [ə.ɹəʊ] - [ə.ɹəʊ.mə]
(2) Back-chaining: [mə] - [ɹəʊ.mə] - [ə.ɹəʊ.mə]

In English, syllables tend to follow a stressed-unstressed pattern, e.g. happy (though there are many exceptions). The order -ma, -roma and aroma respects this. Starting with a- and aro- entails reversing this pattern, which complicates learning. Teachers might also choose to present a chain as pairs of syllables, e.g. beginning with -roma, then aroma: this introduces the strong-weak stress pattern from the outset.

Footnotes

  1. Compare psychological in isolation, it's psychological and psychological profile, where only in the last does the main stress shift to another syllable.