Talk:Glossary of cricket: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Peter Schmitt m (Talk:Glossary of cricket terms moved to Talk:Cricket/Glossary: move to subpage (though it does not exist officially)) |
imported>John Leach (subpages) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
It's already in [[Cricket (sport)/Related Articles]] and, yes, some of the terms would eventually be expanded into full articles. --[[User:John Leach|John Leach]] 00:41, 29 September 2007 (CDT) | It's already in [[Cricket (sport)/Related Articles]] and, yes, some of the terms would eventually be expanded into full articles. --[[User:John Leach|John Leach]] 00:41, 29 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
== moved to subpage == | |||
At the moment there is no (official) Glossary subpage, though such subpages exist. | |||
But it seems to be a good place. --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 23:20, 17 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 08:05, 17 November 2020
This really belongs on Cricket/Related Articles. See CZ:Definitions and CZ:Related Articles for why. --Larry Sanger 14:54, 25 September 2007 (CDT)
- It would also be appropriate to move it to Cricket/Catalogs, no? Or do you mean that all of these terms are subtopics of Cricket and will get their own pages? --Joe Quick (Talk) 18:07, 25 September 2007 (CDT)
It's already in Cricket (sport)/Related Articles and, yes, some of the terms would eventually be expanded into full articles. --John Leach 00:41, 29 September 2007 (CDT)
moved to subpage
At the moment there is no (official) Glossary subpage, though such subpages exist. But it seems to be a good place. --Peter Schmitt 23:20, 17 February 2010 (UTC)