CZ Talk:Name of subpage set?: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>John Stephenson (Tuppence worth) |
imported>Todd Coles (→page locked: new section) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:Cluster can be used for many different things and it's versatility makes it my favoured name of the four. Stephen, you think of fruit but I think of star clusters, such as the Seven Sisters. I think it's the imagery one chooses that leads to the gut feeling (positive or negative). For me, collection has a musty feeling to it; something forgotten in a draw. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris Day|(talk)]] 00:57, 27 July 2007 (CDT) | :Cluster can be used for many different things and it's versatility makes it my favoured name of the four. Stephen, you think of fruit but I think of star clusters, such as the Seven Sisters. I think it's the imagery one chooses that leads to the gut feeling (positive or negative). For me, collection has a musty feeling to it; something forgotten in a draw. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris Day|(talk)]] 00:57, 27 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
::I think 'collection' is the least worst (it covers any kind of material), 'infoset' too techy, 'notebook' too much like journalism; but with 'cluster' I'm not sure people would know what it means. "See the Citizendium cluster on Biology..." [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 20:36, 27 July 2007 (CDT) | ::I think 'collection' is the least worst (it covers any kind of material), 'infoset' too techy, 'notebook' too much like journalism; but with 'cluster' I'm not sure people would know what it means. "See the Citizendium cluster on Biology..." [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 20:36, 27 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
:::See the Citizendium cluster on [[Grapes]]. :-) —[[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] [[User talk:Stephen Ewen|(Talk)]] 22:53, 27 July 2007 (CDT) | |||
Wouldn't it be see Citizendium's biology cluster? Or their grape cluster? We might have a probelm with Star Cluster cluster. Or the General Custer cluster. Otherwise seems to be OK. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris Day|(talk)]] 22:58, 27 July 2007 (CDT) | |||
Don't forget the Colonel Mustard Cluster. :P | |||
It sounds good for the most of the articles. | |||
--[[User:Paul Derry|Paul Derry]] 19:16, 30 July 2007 (CDT) | |||
== page locked == | |||
Page is locked - can't move template. --[[User:Todd Coles|Todd Coles]] 12:15, 24 January 2008 (CST) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:15, 24 January 2008
Clusters are for fruit. —Stephen Ewen (Talk) 15:05, 26 July 2007 (CDT)
- Yeah, that's actually what I like about cluster. It's a familiar word to describe a close grouping of related items (like grapes on a vine). Collection is okay; it's got the library and museum precedent, but maybe that's why it sounds too generic--like a non-decision. Infoset is fine conceptually, but for some reason it sounds like a product. When I say "infoset" I imagine those color-coded SRA reading labs we had in elementary school in the 1970s. My least favorite is notebook. To me it implies something more personal and informal, like a page where an individual Citizen (or end-user) could collect favorite articles with annotations and such. Eric Winesett 00:29, 27 July 2007 (CDT)
- Cluster can be used for many different things and it's versatility makes it my favoured name of the four. Stephen, you think of fruit but I think of star clusters, such as the Seven Sisters. I think it's the imagery one chooses that leads to the gut feeling (positive or negative). For me, collection has a musty feeling to it; something forgotten in a draw. Chris Day (talk) 00:57, 27 July 2007 (CDT)
- I think 'collection' is the least worst (it covers any kind of material), 'infoset' too techy, 'notebook' too much like journalism; but with 'cluster' I'm not sure people would know what it means. "See the Citizendium cluster on Biology..." John Stephenson 20:36, 27 July 2007 (CDT)
- See the Citizendium cluster on Grapes. :-) —Stephen Ewen (Talk) 22:53, 27 July 2007 (CDT)
Wouldn't it be see Citizendium's biology cluster? Or their grape cluster? We might have a probelm with Star Cluster cluster. Or the General Custer cluster. Otherwise seems to be OK. Chris Day (talk) 22:58, 27 July 2007 (CDT)
Don't forget the Colonel Mustard Cluster. :P
It sounds good for the most of the articles. --Paul Derry 19:16, 30 July 2007 (CDT)
page locked
Page is locked - can't move template. --Todd Coles 12:15, 24 January 2008 (CST)