Talk:Replication of a circular bacterial chromosome: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Subpagination Bot m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details)) |
John Leach (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "CZ:Article Mechanics" to "CZ:Article mechanics") |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
We don't need summaries (per se) in encyclopedia articles--the first section should be an unnamed bare introduction to the topic, beginning with a sentence. (See [[CZ:Article | We don't need summaries (per se) in encyclopedia articles--the first section should be an unnamed bare introduction to the topic, beginning with a sentence. (See [[CZ:Article mechanics|Article Mechanics]] for more policy goodness.) I'd edit this myself, but of course I'd only embarrass myself because I don't understand the topic. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 19:46, 8 June 2007 (CDT) Moved it, and will edit.[[User:Nancy Sculerati|Nancy Sculerati]] 20:03, 8 June 2007 (CDT) | ||
::Beautiful article, David. Thank you so much. [[User:Nancy Sculerati|Nancy Sculerati]] 20:03, 8 June 2007 (CDT) | ::Beautiful article, David. Thank you so much. [[User:Nancy Sculerati|Nancy Sculerati]] 20:03, 8 June 2007 (CDT) | ||
== signed article == | |||
Is this actually a signed article? It seems to fit that criteria more readily? [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] 05:12, 7 October 2013 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 16:02, 5 March 2024
We don't need summaries (per se) in encyclopedia articles--the first section should be an unnamed bare introduction to the topic, beginning with a sentence. (See Article Mechanics for more policy goodness.) I'd edit this myself, but of course I'd only embarrass myself because I don't understand the topic. --Larry Sanger 19:46, 8 June 2007 (CDT) Moved it, and will edit.Nancy Sculerati 20:03, 8 June 2007 (CDT)
- Beautiful article, David. Thank you so much. Nancy Sculerati 20:03, 8 June 2007 (CDT)
signed article
Is this actually a signed article? It seems to fit that criteria more readily? Chris Day 05:12, 7 October 2013 (UTC)