CZ:Editorial Council Resolution 0001: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger
imported>Larry Sanger
No edit summary
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== The resolution ==
== The resolution ==


Whereas, The ''Citizendium'' Editorial Council is in need of a method of decisionmaking that is fair, wise, and efficient;
Whereas, The ''Citizendium'' Editorial Council is in need of a method of decisionmaking that is fair, wise, and efficient;  


''Resolved,'' That the Council adopts the document "[[CZ:Editorial Council Rules of Procedure|Editorial Council Rules of Procedure]]," as its rules of procedure.
''Resolved,'' That the Council adopts the document "[[CZ:Editorial Council Rules of Procedure|Editorial Council Rules of Procedure]]," as its rules of procedure.
Line 11: Line 11:
=== Amendments ===
=== Amendments ===


[[CZ:Editorial Council Rules of Procedure/Amendment 1|Amendment 1]] (an amendment to the rules referred to in the resolution)
* [[CZ:Editorial Council Rules of Procedure/Amendment 1|Amendment 1]] (an amendment to the rules referred to in the resolution)
** [[CZ:Editorial Council Rules of Procedure/Amendment 1/Vote|Vote on motion to amend]] - passed 22-0
 
=== Vote ===
 
* [[/Vote|Vote on the resolution]] - passed 24-0


== Current status ==
== Current status ==


Voting on Amendment 1
Adopted


== Discussion ==
== Discussion ==
Line 23: Line 28:
* [[CZ:Editorial Council Resolution 0001/Member position statements|Member position statements]]
* [[CZ:Editorial Council Resolution 0001/Member position statements|Member position statements]]
* Longer statements from Council Members:  
* Longer statements from Council Members:  
*:''Council Members may submit longer statements; follow the first example for purposes of naming the page.''
** ''None submitted''
** [[CZ:Editorial Council Resolution 0001/Sanger opinion|Sanger opinion]]


== Sponsors ==
== Sponsors ==
Line 41: Line 45:
* Entered discussion of Amendment 1: May 9, 11 PM UTC
* Entered discussion of Amendment 1: May 9, 11 PM UTC
* Scheduled close of discussion of Amendment 1: May 16, 3 PM UTC/10 AM EST
* Scheduled close of discussion of Amendment 1: May 16, 3 PM UTC/10 AM EST
* Scheduled close of commentary:  
* Entered voting on motion to amend (Amendment 1): May 17, 8:32 PM UTC/3:32 PM EST
* Entered voting:  
* Close of voting motion to amend (Amendment 1): May 21, 5:58 PM UTC/12:58 PM EST
* Voting deadline:  
* Entered voting on resolution: Tuesday, May 22, 8:01 PM UTC/3:01 PM EST
* Close of voting on resolution: Tuesday, May 29, 3:49 PM UTC/10:49 AM EST




{{Editcouncil}}
{{Editorial Council}}

Latest revision as of 11:39, 4 September 2007

The resolution

Whereas, The Citizendium Editorial Council is in need of a method of decisionmaking that is fair, wise, and efficient;

Resolved, That the Council adopts the document "Editorial Council Rules of Procedure," as its rules of procedure.

Method of execution

The Council will immediately begin using the rules upon adoption.

Amendments

Vote

Current status

Adopted

Discussion

Sponsors

Before it is added to the Agenda, these sponsors, but only these sponsors, may edit the text of the resolution. After it is added to the Agenda, it cannot be edited by anyone except via the amendment process.

Resolution history

  • Proposed: May 1, 2007
  • Entered queue: (bypassed)
  • Entered initial discussion: May 1
  • Entered public discussion: May 2, 5 PM UTC
  • Entered discussion of Amendment 1: May 9, 11 PM UTC
  • Scheduled close of discussion of Amendment 1: May 16, 3 PM UTC/10 AM EST
  • Entered voting on motion to amend (Amendment 1): May 17, 8:32 PM UTC/3:32 PM EST
  • Close of voting motion to amend (Amendment 1): May 21, 5:58 PM UTC/12:58 PM EST
  • Entered voting on resolution: Tuesday, May 22, 8:01 PM UTC/3:01 PM EST
  • Close of voting on resolution: Tuesday, May 29, 3:49 PM UTC/10:49 AM EST


The Editorial Council was merged with the Management Council into a single governing body in 2013. All EC rules and decisions were upheld
except where they contradicted the merger. The following links are to archived and out-of-date pages:
Mailing List ArchivesResolutionsLogEssential PolicyRules of ProcedureHow to Make a Resolution