Talk:Computer/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
imported>Pat Palmer (added link to top) |
imported>John Stephenson m (archiving templates) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | |||
{{archive box}} | |||
This is Archive 1 (4-23-2007) for [[Talk:Computer]] | This is Archive 1 (4-23-2007) for [[Talk:Computer]] | ||
Latest revision as of 12:15, 21 February 2021
This is Archive 1 (4-23-2007) for Talk:Computer
Copied from the CZ:Notice Board
- Is there any objection to put a deepening layer in the Computers pages? I would suggest the following layer between computers and the final detail pages: Computer Science Science of Computers and Computer Linguistics and Semantics (Generally the first two are distinguished as follows: deployment of science, pure science (theoretical) and logics, linguistics and semantics oriented.
- Thanks.
- Rob
- That sounds fine to me. I'm not sure exactly what you mean by "deepening layer" and breaking computer linguistics /semantics out from the rest of Computer Science is something I'd have to see more about, but overall - sounds great, please get started. I'll watch this page (with the watch tab above) and help out where I can. JesseWeinstein 16:08, 24 November 2006 (CST)
Delete the link between the Computers page to the Computers article
Hello, I am figuring out how to delete the present link between Computers and the file Computers and inserting a choice layer inbetween, containing the proposed diversion of topics.
Any help???
thanks Cassiopeia 22:07, 7 December 2006 (CST)Robert Tito
Discussion Area
following here Robert Tito | Talk 22:37, 10 March 2007 (CST)
Shouldn't the article be cleaned up before approval. It has at least still missing pictures (I copied them over from WP) and a strange, unnumbered "18" reference. Some real world references which don't expire (i.e. books) would also be nice. Or are we assuming the editors do that? --Markus Baumeister 06:38, 11 March 2007 (CDT)
Moving
I'm moving this to the singular form of the title. No reason for it to live at "computers" rather than "computer." --Larry Sanger 09:24, 11 March 2007 (CDT)