Talk:Agricultural crops: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Reuven Lazarus
(Title)
imported>Subpagination Bot
m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
{{subpages}}
|                abc = Agricultural crops
|                cat1 = Agriculture
|                cat2 =
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check = n
|              status = 3
|        underlinked = n
|            cleanup = y
|                  by = [[User:Reuven Lazarus|Reuven Lazarus]] 17:32, 1 April 2007 (CDT)
}}


== Title ==
== Title ==

Latest revision as of 07:18, 24 September 2007

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Annual or season's yield of any plant that is deliberately grown in significant quantities to be harvested as food, as livestock fodder, fuel, or for any other economic purpose. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Agriculture [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

Title

I'm not sure if this article is at the right title. On one level, the phrase "agricultural crops" just seems redundant to me - not to mention that it violates the singular-title convention. So if it's going to be an article on crops, a move to "Crop" would seem appropriate. But that's assuming the intention is to add more than the statistics that are currently here - as it stands, this isn't exactly an article on crops (which I assume would contain more general information). If this is going to remain an article with statistics on top agricultural products, it should be renamed accordingly - although personally I'd think that should be a section of the "crop" article, rather than an entry of its own.

So, in short: I don't know what title belongs on this article, but I don't think it's this one. --Reuven Lazarus 17:43, 1 April 2007 (CDT)