Square root of two: Difference between revisions
imported>Sébastien Moulin m (→In Right Triangles: correcting TeX syntax) |
mNo edit summary |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | |||
The [[square root]] of two, denoted <math>\sqrt{2}</math>, is the positive number whose square equals 2. It is approximately 1.4142135623730950488016887242097. It provides a typical example of an [[irrational number]]. | The [[square root]] of two, denoted <math>\sqrt{2}</math>, is the positive number whose square equals 2. It is approximately 1.4142135623730950488016887242097. It provides a typical example of an [[irrational number]]. | ||
== In Right Triangles == | == In Right Triangles == | ||
The square root of two plays an important role in [[right triangle|right triangles]] in that a unit right triangle (where both legs are equal to 1), has a [[hypotenuse]] of <math>\sqrt{2}</math>. Thus, <math>\sin\left(\frac{\pi}{4}\right) = \cos\left(\frac{\pi}{4}\right)=\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}</math>. | The square root of two plays an important role in [[right triangle|right triangles]] in that a unit right triangle (where both legs are equal to 1), has a [[hypotenuse]] of <math>\sqrt{2}</math>. Thus, <math>\sin\left(\frac{\pi}{4}\right) = \cos\left(\frac{\pi}{4}\right)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}=\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}</math>. | ||
== Proof of Irrationality == | == Proof of Irrationality == | ||
There exists a simple proof by contradiction showing that <math>\sqrt{2}</math> is irrational: | There exists a simple proof by contradiction showing that <math>\sqrt{2}</math> is irrational. This proof is often attributed to [[Pythagoras]]. It is an example of a [[reductio ad absurdum]] type of proof: | ||
Suppose <math>\sqrt{2}</math> is rational. Then there must exist two numbers, <math>x, y \in \mathbb{N}</math>, such that <math>\frac{x}{y} = \sqrt{2}</math> and <math>x</math> and <math>y</math> represent the smallest such [[integer|integers]] (i.e., they are [[mutually prime]]). | |||
Therefore, <math>\frac{x^2}{y^2} = 2</math> and <math>x^2 = 2 \times y^2</math>, | Therefore, <math>\frac{x^2}{y^2} = 2</math> and <math>x^2 = 2 \times y^2</math>, | ||
Thus, <math>x^2</math> represents an [[even number]] | Thus, <math>x^2</math> represents an [[even number]]; therefore <math>x</math> must also be even. This means that there is an integer <math>k</math> such that <math>x = 2 \times k</math>. Inserting it back into our previous equation, we find that <math>(2 \times k)^2 = 2 \times y^2</math> | ||
Through simplification, we find that <math>4 \times k^2 = 2 \times y^2</math>, and then that, <math>2 \times k^2 = y^2</math>, | |||
[[ | Since <math>k</math> is an integer, <math>y^2</math> and therefore also <math>y</math> must ''also'' be even. However, if <math>x</math> and <math>y</math> are both even, they share a common [[factor]] of 2, making them ''not'' mutually prime. And that is a contradiction, so the assumption must be false, and <math>\sqrt{2}</math> must not be rational.[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]] | ||
[[Category: |
Latest revision as of 11:00, 21 October 2024
The square root of two, denoted , is the positive number whose square equals 2. It is approximately 1.4142135623730950488016887242097. It provides a typical example of an irrational number.
In Right Triangles
The square root of two plays an important role in right triangles in that a unit right triangle (where both legs are equal to 1), has a hypotenuse of . Thus, .
Proof of Irrationality
There exists a simple proof by contradiction showing that is irrational. This proof is often attributed to Pythagoras. It is an example of a reductio ad absurdum type of proof:
Suppose is rational. Then there must exist two numbers, , such that and and represent the smallest such integers (i.e., they are mutually prime).
Therefore, and ,
Thus, represents an even number; therefore must also be even. This means that there is an integer such that . Inserting it back into our previous equation, we find that
Through simplification, we find that , and then that, ,
Since is an integer, and therefore also must also be even. However, if and are both even, they share a common factor of 2, making them not mutually prime. And that is a contradiction, so the assumption must be false, and must not be rational.