User talk:Mathieu Beauvais-St-Pierre: Difference between revisions
imported>Robert Tito mNo edit summary |
imported>Stephen Ewen (==Nicknames==) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
''Kind Regards'', | ''Kind Regards'', | ||
[[User:Robert Tito|Robert Tito]] | <span style="background:black"> <font color="red"><b>[[User talk:Robert Tito|Talk]]</b></font> </span> 15:54, 26 March 2007 (CDT) | [[User:Robert Tito|Robert Tito]] | <span style="background:black"> <font color="red"><b>[[User talk:Robert Tito|Talk]]</b></font> </span> 15:54, 26 March 2007 (CDT) | ||
== Please answer again, moved reply == | |||
Mathieu, I apologize for not making the discussion format clear. Charged with documenting the specific issues coming up with our application review procedure, I chose an open way on the wiki that allows comments from citizens, and I tried to implement it quickly and properly.[http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/CZ_Talk:Application_Review_Procedure] I did so imperfectly. I realize, by your post and Stephen's reply, that debates are better on the forums, and that I had not set up the talk page to exclude debates between users. I have now remedied that (hopefully). | |||
Since you replied to another user-and not directly to the question, I moved your response to the Forums, along with the reply to your response. (Please take a look at the Forums before you get mad, [http://forum.citizendium.org/] if you are still mad after you do- tell me about it on my talk page :-). I'll listen) Anyway, as I say- I apologize. But I thank you, also, because now I see what I should have laid out at the top of that talk page to begin with, and have now been more explicit. By allowing everybody to post an answer to the question - one answer per question (can always be edited), I think we can keep a useful record of issues and opinions, without getting lost in tangles. Please, could you kindly return to the page [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/CZ_Talk:Application_Review_Procedure] and answer the question? If you would like to debate other users' replies further, please do so on the Forums. Thanks, [[User:Nancy Sculerati|Nancy Sculerati]] 07:37, 27 March 2007 (CDT) | |||
==Nicknames== | |||
Kindly see and follow [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=User_talk:Jo%C3%A3o_Prado_Ribeiro_Campos&diff=100061121&oldid=100060550 this]. [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 05:26, 28 March 2007 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 11:26, 28 March 2007
[User bio is in User:Your Name]
Welcome
| Citizendium Getting Started | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Quick Start | About us | Help system | Start a new article | For Wikipedians | |||
Tasks: start a new article • add basic, wanted or requested articles • add definitions • add metadata • edit new pages
Welcome to the Citizendium! We hope you will contribute boldly and well. Here are pointers for a quick start, and see Getting Started for other helpful "startup" links, our help system and CZ:Home for the top menu of community pages. You can test out editing in the sandbox if you'd like. If you need help to get going, the forum is one option. That's also where we discuss policy and proposals. You can ask any user or the editors for help, too. Just put a note on their "talk" page. Again, welcome and have fun!
You can find some more information about our collaboration groups if you follow this link CZ:Workgroups.You can always ask me on my talk page or others about how to proceed or any other question you might have.
Kind Regards,
Robert Tito | Talk 15:54, 26 March 2007 (CDT)
Please answer again, moved reply
Mathieu, I apologize for not making the discussion format clear. Charged with documenting the specific issues coming up with our application review procedure, I chose an open way on the wiki that allows comments from citizens, and I tried to implement it quickly and properly.[1] I did so imperfectly. I realize, by your post and Stephen's reply, that debates are better on the forums, and that I had not set up the talk page to exclude debates between users. I have now remedied that (hopefully).
Since you replied to another user-and not directly to the question, I moved your response to the Forums, along with the reply to your response. (Please take a look at the Forums before you get mad, [2] if you are still mad after you do- tell me about it on my talk page :-). I'll listen) Anyway, as I say- I apologize. But I thank you, also, because now I see what I should have laid out at the top of that talk page to begin with, and have now been more explicit. By allowing everybody to post an answer to the question - one answer per question (can always be edited), I think we can keep a useful record of issues and opinions, without getting lost in tangles. Please, could you kindly return to the page [3] and answer the question? If you would like to debate other users' replies further, please do so on the Forums. Thanks, Nancy Sculerati 07:37, 27 March 2007 (CDT)
Nicknames
Kindly see and follow this. Stephen Ewen 05:26, 28 March 2007 (CDT)