Talk:United States Congress: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>José Leonardo Andrade
imported>Richard Jensen
(moved to U.S. Congress talk)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
|                abc = United States Congress
|                cat1 = Politics
|                cat2 =
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check = n
|              status = 2
|        underlinked = n
|            cleanup = y
|                  by = -[[User:Rilson Versuri|Versuri]] 11:45, 26 March 2007 (CDT)
}}


Trivial change: "infamous" is a very non-neutral word. ''Notorious'' isn't necessarily negative. Perhaps a simple ''famous'' would be better, but definitely not ''egregious''. [[User:Daniel Drake|Daniel Drake]] 02:18, 4 April 2007 (CDT)
:I agree "infamous" was not a good choice, though I struggled more with that word than nearly any other in the article!  "Famous" sounded like something I'd use for Britney Spears... Maybe I need to just rephrase the whole thing.  Thanks for the spelling and grammar check on the rest of it. [[User:Steve Mount|Steve Mount]] 15:38, 4 April 2007 (CDT)  [edit: ok, I thought "famous" sounded more reasonable there than I initially thought. Regardless of your "side" in the revolution, I think the word is appropriate.]
== change name to U.S. Congress for consistency ==
any objection to changing the name to '''U.S. Congress''' for consistency? [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 06:03, 26 April 2007 (CDT)
I don't know. Don't you think it sounds too informal?--[[User:José Leonardo Andrade|José Leonardo Andrade]] 09:20, 26 April 2007 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 23:29, 27 April 2007