Talk:World Wheat Economy: Difference between revisions
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
imported>Jitse Niesen m (remove vertical bar from template argument) |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| cat3 = | | cat3 = | ||
| cat_check = n | | cat_check = n | ||
| status = | | status = 2 | ||
| underlinked = n | | underlinked = n | ||
| cleanup = y | | cleanup = y | ||
| by = [[User: | | by = [[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 20:59, 2 April 2007 (CDT); [[User:Joe Quick|Joe Quick]] 16:53, 17 March 2007 (CDT) | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{stub}} | <nowiki>{{stub}}</nowiki> | ||
The "stub" template should ''never'' go at the top of the article itself. People can see that an article is a stub; there's no reason to bill it as such. This is a bad habit Wikipedians got into. | |||
Besides, the article is no longer a stub by our definition. Status = 2. | |||
I think we probably should never use <nowiki>{{main}}</nowiki> at the top of an article. It marries a particular article to another particular article in a special way, and I'm not sure that's ever justified. Why not just have a "see also" link at the bottom of the article? --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 20:57, 2 April 2007 (CDT) | I think we probably should never use <nowiki>{{main}}</nowiki> at the top of an article. It marries a particular article to another particular article in a special way, and I'm not sure that's ever justified. Why not just have a "see also" link at the bottom of the article? --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 20:57, 2 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
==Production== | |||
I found more detailed figures on the French Wikipedia, I don't know if it can be of any use to you : | |||
{| border="1" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" align="center" | |||
|----- | |||
| colspan="6" align="center" bgcolor=#DDFFDD | | |||
'''Production en tonnes. Chiffres 2005'''<br /> <small>Données de FAOSTAT ([[Organisation des Nations Unies pour l'alimentation et l'agriculture|FAO]]) [http://faostat.fao.org/site/336/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=336 Base de données de la FAO, accès du 7 avril 2007]</small> | |||
|----- | |||
| align="center"|'''Country'''||align="center"|'''Cultivated area'''<br> (milliers d'hectares)||align="center"|'''Yield''' <br>(quintaux/hectares)||align="center"|'''Production'''<br> (en tonnes) | |||
|----- | |||
| align="left"|{{Chine}}||align="right"|44 793,46||align="right"|21,7540||align="right"|97 445 250 | |||
|------ | |||
| align="left"|{{Inde}}||align="right"|26 493,46||align="right"|27,177||align="right"|72 000 000 | |||
|------ | |||
| align="left"|US||align="right"|20 274,35||align="right"|28,253||align="right"|57 280 270 | |||
|------ | |||
| align="left"|{{Russie}}||align="right"|24 619,09||align="right"|19,374||align="right"|47 697 520 | |||
|------ | |||
| align="left"|{{France}}||align="right"|5 272,50||align="right"|69,874||align="right"|36 840 810 | |||
|------ | |||
| align="left"|{{Canada}}||align="right"|9 828,05||align="right"|27,243||align="right"|26 775 000 | |||
|------ | |||
| align="left"|{{Australie}}||align="right"|12 625,50||align="right"|19,872||align="right"|25 090 000 | |||
|------ | |||
| align="left"|Germany||align="right"|3 174,00||align="right"|74,646||align="right"|23 692 700 | |||
|------ | |||
| align="left"|{{Pakistan}}||align="right"|8 357,97||align="right"|25,858||align="right"|21 612 300 | |||
|------ | |||
| align="left"|{{Turquie}}||align="right"|9 300,01||align="right"|22,581||align="right"|21 000 000 | |||
|------ | |||
| align="left"|{{Ukraine}}||align="right"|11 216,49||align="right"|16,671||align="right"|18 699 200 | |||
|------ | |||
| align="left"|{{Argentine}}||align="right"|12 854,36||align="right"|9,786||align="right"|12 579 150 | |||
|------ | |||
| align="left"|UK||align="right"|1 868,90||align="right"|79,603||align="right"|14 877 000 | |||
|------ | |||
| align="left"|{{Iran}}||align="right"|6 499,00||align="right"|32,310||align="right"|14 500 000 | |||
|------ | |||
| align="left"|{{Kazakhstan}}||align="right"|8 324,63||align="right"|13,293||align="right"|11 066 000 | |||
|------ | |||
| align="left"|Poland||align="right"|2 218,08||align="right"|39,543||align="right"|8 771 000 | |||
|------ | |||
| align="left"|{{Égypte}}||align="right"|1 261,98||align="right"|64,858||align="right"|8 185 000 | |||
|------ | |||
| align="left"|{{Italie}}||align="right"|2 122,93||align="right"|36,351||align="right"|7 717 130 | |||
|------ | |||
| align="left"|{{Roumanie}}||align="right"|2 448,15||align="right"|29,985||align="right"|7 340 660 | |||
|------ | |||
| align="left"|{{Ouzbékistan}}||align="right"|1 439,73||align="right"|41,173||align="right"|5 927 800 | |||
|------ | |||
| align="right"|other countries ||align="right"|30 750,01||align="right"|26,478||align="right"|83 464 640 | |||
|----- | |||
|align="right"| '''Total'''||align="right"|'''245 742,52'''||align="right"|'''29,0028'''||align="right"|'''622 561 430''' | |||
|} |
Latest revision as of 10:22, 16 November 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Agriculture Workgroup, Economics Workgroup [Categories OK] |
Article status | Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete |
Underlinked article? | No |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | Larry Sanger 20:59, 2 April 2007 (CDT); Joe Quick 16:53, 17 March 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
{{stub}}
The "stub" template should never go at the top of the article itself. People can see that an article is a stub; there's no reason to bill it as such. This is a bad habit Wikipedians got into.
Besides, the article is no longer a stub by our definition. Status = 2.
I think we probably should never use {{main}} at the top of an article. It marries a particular article to another particular article in a special way, and I'm not sure that's ever justified. Why not just have a "see also" link at the bottom of the article? --Larry Sanger 20:57, 2 April 2007 (CDT)
Production
I found more detailed figures on the French Wikipedia, I don't know if it can be of any use to you :
Production en tonnes. Chiffres 2005 | |||||
Country | Cultivated area (milliers d'hectares) |
Yield (quintaux/hectares) |
Production (en tonnes) | ||
Template:Chine | 44 793,46 | 21,7540 | 97 445 250 | ||
Template:Inde | 26 493,46 | 27,177 | 72 000 000 | ||
US | 20 274,35 | 28,253 | 57 280 270 | ||
Template:Russie | 24 619,09 | 19,374 | 47 697 520 | ||
Template:France | 5 272,50 | 69,874 | 36 840 810 | ||
Template:Canada | 9 828,05 | 27,243 | 26 775 000 | ||
Template:Australie | 12 625,50 | 19,872 | 25 090 000 | ||
Germany | 3 174,00 | 74,646 | 23 692 700 | ||
Template:Pakistan | 8 357,97 | 25,858 | 21 612 300 | ||
Template:Turquie | 9 300,01 | 22,581 | 21 000 000 | ||
Template:Ukraine | 11 216,49 | 16,671 | 18 699 200 | ||
Template:Argentine | 12 854,36 | 9,786 | 12 579 150 | ||
UK | 1 868,90 | 79,603 | 14 877 000 | ||
Template:Iran | 6 499,00 | 32,310 | 14 500 000 | ||
Template:Kazakhstan | 8 324,63 | 13,293 | 11 066 000 | ||
Poland | 2 218,08 | 39,543 | 8 771 000 | ||
Template:Égypte | 1 261,98 | 64,858 | 8 185 000 | ||
Template:Italie | 2 122,93 | 36,351 | 7 717 130 | ||
Template:Roumanie | 2 448,15 | 29,985 | 7 340 660 | ||
Template:Ouzbékistan | 1 439,73 | 41,173 | 5 927 800 | ||
other countries | 30 750,01 | 26,478 | 83 464 640 | ||
Total | 245 742,52 | 29,0028 | 622 561 430 |
- Agriculture Category Check
- General Category Check
- Economics Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Agriculture Advanced Articles
- Agriculture Nonstub Articles
- Agriculture Internal Articles
- Economics Advanced Articles
- Economics Nonstub Articles
- Economics Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Agriculture Developed Articles
- Economics Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Agriculture Developing Articles
- Economics Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Agriculture Stub Articles
- Economics Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Agriculture External Articles
- Economics External Articles
- Agriculture Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Economics Underlinked Articles
- Agriculture Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Economics Cleanup
- Cleanup