Talk:Pike (programming language): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Robert Tito mNo edit summary |
imported>Tom Morris |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | |||
I thought I spoke them all, this one is a newbie for me. Cool. You check APL, hehe see if you know that one. :) [[User:Robert Tito|Robert Tito]] | [[User talk:Robert Tito|Talk]] 22:41, 23 February 2007 (CST) | I thought I spoke them all, this one is a newbie for me. Cool. You check APL, hehe see if you know that one. :) [[User:Robert Tito|Robert Tito]] | [[User talk:Robert Tito|Talk]] 22:41, 23 February 2007 (CST) | ||
===the big write=== | ===the big write=== | ||
Is it ok, if Pike will be one of the branches of [[programming languages]]? as well as any other progr. lang of course. It will unite every language we can come up with for computers. If you like it, add your name as one of the authors please. [[User:Robert Tito|Robert Tito]] | [[User talk:Robert Tito|Talk]] 14:35, 24 February 2007 (CST) | Is it ok, if Pike will be one of the branches of [[programming languages]]? as well as any other progr. lang of course. It will unite every language we can come up with for computers. If you like it, add your name as one of the authors please. [[User:Robert Tito|Robert Tito]] | [[User talk:Robert Tito|Talk]] 14:35, 24 February 2007 (CST) | ||
Latest revision as of 06:11, 8 August 2009
I thought I spoke them all, this one is a newbie for me. Cool. You check APL, hehe see if you know that one. :) Robert Tito | Talk 22:41, 23 February 2007 (CST)
the big write
Is it ok, if Pike will be one of the branches of programming languages? as well as any other progr. lang of course. It will unite every language we can come up with for computers. If you like it, add your name as one of the authors please. Robert Tito | Talk 14:35, 24 February 2007 (CST)