Talk:Bitis parviocula: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Peter J. King (my formatting (now all reverted)) |
imported>Subpagination Bot m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details)) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | |||
==My formatting (now all reverted)== | ==My formatting (now all reverted)== | ||
My problems were: | My problems were: | ||
| Line 6: | Line 8: | ||
#To leave in Wikipedia templates that simply show up as red "template" signs is surely undesirable. | #To leave in Wikipedia templates that simply show up as red "template" signs is surely undesirable. | ||
#Why have something in "see also" which is already in the article? --[[User:Peter J. King|Peter J. King]] 09:50, 13 February 2007 (CST) | #Why have something in "see also" which is already in the article? --[[User:Peter J. King|Peter J. King]] 09:50, 13 February 2007 (CST) | ||
See my answer on your talk page. --[[User:Jaap Winius|Jaap Winius]] 12:21, 13 February 2007 (CST) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:28, 25 September 2007
My formatting (now all reverted)
My problems were:
- To place a "common names" line before the article rather than in the article looks very odd.
- To use abbreviations rather than full names of unites is less clear for potential users (as is omitting a link to the relevant article).
- To leave in Wikipedia templates that simply show up as red "template" signs is surely undesirable.
- Why have something in "see also" which is already in the article? --Peter J. King 09:50, 13 February 2007 (CST)
See my answer on your talk page. --Jaap Winius 12:21, 13 February 2007 (CST)