Talk:Anemia: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Michael Benjamin No edit summary |
imported>Subpagination Bot m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details)) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | |||
decreased production (hypoproliferation), increased destruction, ineffect production (like can't get out of marrow - important for differentiating from other types), acute blood loss, redistribution (like a big spleen - i feel this IS a cause of anemia and should be listed separately even though other anemias also have splenomegaly). [[User:Thomas E Kelly|-Tom Kelly]] [[User talk:Thomas E Kelly|(Talk)]] 19:25, 11 February 2007 (CST) | |||
: i just thought these categories should be the == == with the underlines in the article [[User:Thomas E Kelly|-Tom Kelly]] [[User talk:Thomas E Kelly|(Talk)]] 22:42, 12 February 2007 (CST) | |||
We should redact and augment the Wikipedia article. I have started doing this, but anemia's a big topic. I think each heading should have a brief overview of each category, but that each category should have its own entry.[[User:Michael Benjamin]] [[User talk:Michael Benjamin|(Talk)]] 11 February 2007 | We should redact and augment the Wikipedia article. I have started doing this, but anemia's a big topic. I think each heading should have a brief overview of each category, but that each category should have its own entry.[[User:Michael Benjamin]] [[User talk:Michael Benjamin|(Talk)]] 11 February 2007 | ||
Latest revision as of 14:54, 24 September 2007
decreased production (hypoproliferation), increased destruction, ineffect production (like can't get out of marrow - important for differentiating from other types), acute blood loss, redistribution (like a big spleen - i feel this IS a cause of anemia and should be listed separately even though other anemias also have splenomegaly). -Tom Kelly (Talk) 19:25, 11 February 2007 (CST)
- i just thought these categories should be the == == with the underlines in the article -Tom Kelly (Talk) 22:42, 12 February 2007 (CST)
We should redact and augment the Wikipedia article. I have started doing this, but anemia's a big topic. I think each heading should have a brief overview of each category, but that each category should have its own entry.User:Michael Benjamin (Talk) 11 February 2007