Talk:Balance of trade: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Derek Harkness
(Article Checklist)
imported>Nick Gardner
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
{{subpages}}
|                abc = Balance of trade
 
|                cat1 = Economics
|                cat2 =
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check = n
|              status = 1
|        underlinked = y
|            cleanup = y
|                  by = [[User:Derek Harkness|Derek Harkness]] 04:13, 3 June 2007 (CDT)
}}
I think this article, in its present form, is biased towards the view that having a trade deficit is almost desirable. I think there is rather more to say about it than is done now. OK if I try to make it a bit more balanced? Best regards, [[User:Martin van Dalen|Martin van Dalen]] 06:54, 11 November 2006 (CST)
I think this article, in its present form, is biased towards the view that having a trade deficit is almost desirable. I think there is rather more to say about it than is done now. OK if I try to make it a bit more balanced? Best regards, [[User:Martin van Dalen|Martin van Dalen]] 06:54, 11 November 2006 (CST)
I agree with that comment,Martin, and I wish you well with your amendments.  [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 01:06, 26 November 2007 (CST)

Latest revision as of 01:06, 26 November 2007

This article is developed but not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition The difference between the monetary value of exports and imports in an economy over a given time. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Economics [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

I think this article, in its present form, is biased towards the view that having a trade deficit is almost desirable. I think there is rather more to say about it than is done now. OK if I try to make it a bit more balanced? Best regards, Martin van Dalen 06:54, 11 November 2006 (CST)

I agree with that comment,Martin, and I wish you well with your amendments. Nick Gardner 01:06, 26 November 2007 (CST)