Hund's rules: Difference between revisions
imported>Paul Wormer No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | |||
In [[atomic spectroscopy]], '''Hund's rules''' predict the order of atomic energy levels with quantum numbers ''L'' (orbital), ''S'' (spin) and ''J'' (orbital plus spin). The rules are called after [[Friedrich Hund]] who formulated them in 1925.<ref>F. Hund, ''Zur Deutung verwickelter Spektren, insbesondere der Elemente Scandium bis Nickel.'' [On the interpretation of complicated spectra, in particular the elements scandium through nickel]. Zeitschrift für Physik, vol. '''33''', pp. 345-371 (1925).</ref> | |||
If there is no spin-orbit coupling, the functions of one term (fixed ''L'' and ''S'') are degenerate (have the same energy). If there is weak spin-orbit coupling it is useful to diagonalize the matrix of the corresponding spin-orbit operator within the '' | ==LS coupling== | ||
A group of atomic energy levels, obtained by [[Russell-Saunders coupling]], is concisely indicated by a [[term symbol]]. As discussed in the article [[Russell-Saunders coupling]], closed shells and closed subshells have ''L'' = ''S'' = 0 and hence can be ignored in the coupling. A ''term'' (also known as ''multiplet'') is a set of simultaneous eigenfunctions of '''L'''<sup>2</sup> (total orbital angular momentum squared) and '''S'''<sup>2</sup> (total spin angular momentum squared) with given quantum numbers ''L'' and ''S'', respectively. That is, the respective eigenvalues are ''L(L+1)''ℏ<sup>2</sup> | |||
and ''S(S+1)''ℏ<sup>2</sup>. | |||
If there is no spin-orbit coupling, the functions of one term (fixed ''L'' and ''S'') are (2''L''+1)×(2''S''+1)-fold degenerate (have the same energy). If there is weak spin-orbit coupling it is useful to diagonalize the matrix of the corresponding spin-orbit operator within the ''L-S'' basis [consisting of the (2''L''+1)×(2''S''+1) functions of the term] in the spirit of first-order [[perturbation theory]]. This lifts partially the degeneracy and introduces the new conserved quantum number ''J'', with |''L''-''S''| ≤ ''J'' ≤ ''L''+''S'', that labels a (2''J''+1)-fold degenerate energy level. | |||
[[Image:Carbon levels.png|right|thumb|350px|Level scheme of the [[carbon]] atom <math>\scriptstyle (1s)^2(2s)^2(2p)^2</math>. Drawing is not on scale. On the left the energy | |||
without any two-particle interaction. Then three-fold energy splitting after switching on electrostatic electron-electron interaction (''L'' and ''S'' good quantum numbers). Then splittings after switching on first-order spin-orbit coupling (''J'' good quantum number). Finally on the right [[Zeeman]] splittings in an external magnetic field.]] | |||
==Formulation of the rules== | |||
Hund's rules are:<ref>L. Pauling, ''The Nature of the Chemical Bond'', Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 3rd edition (1960)</ref> | Hund's rules are:<ref>L. Pauling, ''The Nature of the Chemical Bond'', Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 3rd edition (1960)</ref> | ||
# Of the Russell-Saunders states arising from a given [[ | # Of the Russell-Saunders states arising from a given [[electron configuration]] those with the largest spin quantum number ''S'' lie lowest, those with the next largest next, and so on; in other words, the states with largest spin multiplicity are the most stable. | ||
# Of the group of terms with a given value of ''S'', that with the largest value of ''L'' lies lowest. | # Of the group of terms with a given value of ''S'', that with the largest value of ''L'' lies lowest. | ||
# Of the states with given values of ''S'' and ''L'' in an electronic configuration consisting of less than half the electrons in a closed subshell, the state with the smallest value of ''J'' is usually the most stable, and for a configuration consisting of more than half the electrons in a closed subshell the state with largest ''J'' is the most stable. | # Of the states with given values of ''S'' and ''L'' in an electronic configuration consisting of less than half the electrons in a closed subshell, the state with the smallest value of ''J'' is usually the most stable, and for a configuration consisting of more than half the electrons in a closed subshell the state with largest ''J'' is the most stable. | ||
Line 13: | Line 21: | ||
The levels of the second sort, largest ''J'' most stable, can be seen as arising from holes in a closed subshell. | The levels of the second sort, largest ''J'' most stable, can be seen as arising from holes in a closed subshell. | ||
Examples | ==Examples== | ||
* The ground state carbon atom, (1''s'')<sup>2</sup>(2''s'')<sup>2</sup>(2''p'')<sup>2</sup>, gives by [[Russell-Saunders coupling]] a set of energy levels labeled by [[term symbol]]s. Hund's rules predict the following order of the energies: | * The ground state carbon atom, (1''s'')<sup>2</sup>(2''s'')<sup>2</sup>(2''p'')<sup>2</sup>, gives by [[Russell-Saunders coupling]] a set of energy levels labeled by [[term symbol]]s. Hund's rules predict the following order of the energies: | ||
Line 23: | Line 31: | ||
^3P_{2} < ^3P_{1} < ^3P_{0} < ^1D_{2} < ^1S_{0}. | ^3P_{2} < ^3P_{1} < ^3P_{0} < ^1D_{2} < ^1S_{0}. | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references /> | <references />[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]] | ||
[[Category: | |||
Latest revision as of 07:00, 30 August 2024
In atomic spectroscopy, Hund's rules predict the order of atomic energy levels with quantum numbers L (orbital), S (spin) and J (orbital plus spin). The rules are called after Friedrich Hund who formulated them in 1925.[1]
LS coupling
A group of atomic energy levels, obtained by Russell-Saunders coupling, is concisely indicated by a term symbol. As discussed in the article Russell-Saunders coupling, closed shells and closed subshells have L = S = 0 and hence can be ignored in the coupling. A term (also known as multiplet) is a set of simultaneous eigenfunctions of L2 (total orbital angular momentum squared) and S2 (total spin angular momentum squared) with given quantum numbers L and S, respectively. That is, the respective eigenvalues are L(L+1)ℏ2 and S(S+1)ℏ2.
If there is no spin-orbit coupling, the functions of one term (fixed L and S) are (2L+1)×(2S+1)-fold degenerate (have the same energy). If there is weak spin-orbit coupling it is useful to diagonalize the matrix of the corresponding spin-orbit operator within the L-S basis [consisting of the (2L+1)×(2S+1) functions of the term] in the spirit of first-order perturbation theory. This lifts partially the degeneracy and introduces the new conserved quantum number J, with |L-S| ≤ J ≤ L+S, that labels a (2J+1)-fold degenerate energy level.
Formulation of the rules
Hund's rules are:[2]
- Of the Russell-Saunders states arising from a given electron configuration those with the largest spin quantum number S lie lowest, those with the next largest next, and so on; in other words, the states with largest spin multiplicity are the most stable.
- Of the group of terms with a given value of S, that with the largest value of L lies lowest.
- Of the states with given values of S and L in an electronic configuration consisting of less than half the electrons in a closed subshell, the state with the smallest value of J is usually the most stable, and for a configuration consisting of more than half the electrons in a closed subshell the state with largest J is the most stable.
The levels of the second sort, largest J most stable, can be seen as arising from holes in a closed subshell.
Examples
- The ground state carbon atom, (1s)2(2s)2(2p)2, gives by Russell-Saunders coupling a set of energy levels labeled by term symbols. Hund's rules predict the following order of the energies:
- The ground state oxygen atom, (1s)2(2s)2(2p)4, (a two-hole state) gives by Russell-Saunders coupling a set of energy levels labeled by term symbols. Hund's rules predict the following order of the energies:
References
- ↑ F. Hund, Zur Deutung verwickelter Spektren, insbesondere der Elemente Scandium bis Nickel. [On the interpretation of complicated spectra, in particular the elements scandium through nickel]. Zeitschrift für Physik, vol. 33, pp. 345-371 (1925).
- ↑ L. Pauling, The Nature of the Chemical Bond, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 3rd edition (1960)